Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Starlit...
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Starlit...

by Jorne de Bruin

Gallery: LandscapePosted May 19, 201098 views7 comments
..well ok, moonlit, but since the moon is not in this image that would just be a silly title now wouldn't it :wink:

After seeing some fantastic starlit skies and landscapes and reading some tutorials written by several members of this gallery (thanks for your great work btw!) I had to give this a try. Nowhere near as good as most of the stuff I've seen but I'm pretty alright with how this turned out.

This is just one image, since I did not need any fg detail I decided to take just a single image instead of combining two exposures.

I did have some problems here, I used a 30 sec exposure to get a lot of stars, but when looking closer the stars are already small trails, not sure how to fix that other then with a shorter ss and higher iso which did nto turn out that great either. Also my afterglow got ruined by some late clouds but hey what can you do :wink:

Any and all tips for improvement welcoe of course! Thanks!

Tech; Canon 7d, 17mm @ f6,3 iso 400 & 30sec

Comments

7 comments
Comment posted by Guy Tal on May 19, 2010 at 10:51 AM
This feels quiet and moody to me. I love to stare into it and wonder what nocturnal critters are out among the reeds.

Guy
Registered on November 1, 2003, 566 Posts, 15507 Comments
Comment posted by Nicolas Belokurov on May 19, 2010 at 11:47 AM
It's a nice capture, calm and have a good array of warm and cool colors.
Registered on July 22, 2009, 41 Posts, 533 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel Rappaport on May 19, 2010 at 2:08 PM
Simple strong composition and colors. As I understand it 30 sec is the longest you can expose stars and not get obvious streaking.
Registered on September 9, 2009, 294 Posts, 2006 Comments
Comment posted by Luis Argerich on May 19, 2010 at 3:17 PM
I love it the water in the foreground has a nice glow to go with the starscape.

There is no solution but try a shorter exposure time; in fact I think I read a paper last week about un-trailing star trails by software but as far as I know there is no application to do that yet.
You can try taking several images of the short exposure and then combining them to increase brightness and/or reduce noise. As stars move you need to align the pictures first with some pano software, then use different layer modes to either average or add the exposures. Averaging reduces noise, adding increases brightness. The problem is that as you align the stars the background which is static will go wrong so you then need to reposition the sky in the shot. Ahh yes, not easy :)
Registered on December 22, 2009, 91 Posts, 1349 Comments
Comment posted by Jorne de Bruin on May 19, 2010 at 3:45 PM
Thanks everyone!

@ Luis, yeah I figured the only (easy) way was a shorter ss. Thanks for explaining the other method, not sure I'll try to use it anytime soon though :biggrin: :wink:
Registered on June 26, 2008, 178 Posts, 2136 Comments
Comment posted by Roman Kurywczak on May 19, 2010 at 3:54 PM
Hi Jorne,
A longer focal length will also increase the triling....even at shorter SS....so be careful there! I usually do my night images w/o the moon and try opening up on the 17mm to f4 or or 4.5.....DOF should be OK in this case .....focused on infinity.
Registered on November 20, 2009, 56 Posts, 748 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on May 19, 2010 at 7:14 PM
Jorne,

Pretty darn nice starry night image. The additional light and color being reflected in the water makes for a nice compliment to the open night sky and I think you executed this well. Looks like you did well in holding back the noise too. Nice work.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments