Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Freedom (4 versions)
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Freedom (4 versions)

by Kah Kit Yoong

Gallery: LandscapePosted May 28, 2010569 views36 comments
West Coast, New Zealand

2 versions of a sunset seascape. I prefer the composition and water motion in the first one but the light was better in the second. Overall, I'm leaning towards the first.

Canon 5DMkII, 16-35mm 2.8L, GND filter.

Comments

36 comments
Comment posted by Kah Kit Yoong on May 28, 2010 at 11:37 PM
And the second version.
Registered on September 27, 2006, 636 Posts, 10682 Comments
Comment posted by Gabi Lach on May 28, 2010 at 11:58 PM
This is very pretty. Moody and dynamic... I prefer the second version. It feels more vibrant, kinda happy and alive. :smile: Very well done, Kah. Both of them look great.
Registered on May 1, 2007, 101 Posts, 3187 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Windom on May 29, 2010 at 12:20 AM
I prefer the first version, taking water action over more clouds. I see the seagull did a 180 between shots. Gorgeous light!
Registered on November 1, 2003, 176 Posts, 2302 Comments
Comment posted by mark cillo on May 29, 2010 at 12:23 AM
Wow! :toast:
Registered on July 27, 2008, 143 Posts, 1483 Comments
Comment posted by Kory Lidstrom on May 29, 2010 at 1:13 AM
Both are quite beautiful, but I'd have to give the edge to number one, because the sun glinting off the water is just sublime, and the bird is in a better position.
Registered on November 19, 2008, 49 Posts, 1035 Comments
Comment posted by Vance Gese on May 29, 2010 at 1:37 AM
Both are stunning images but I'm inclined to prefer the first image with the great water motion, and (silly as it may sound) the bird looking left into the frame. Compositionally, just seems to work a bit better. But both really are beautiful.
Registered on November 13, 2008, 298 Posts, 6629 Comments
Comment posted by Abdullaziz Bin Ali on May 29, 2010 at 2:04 AM
as you mentioned
the water in the first picture is amazing
and the sky is wonderful in the second
I might go for the first one with brightening the front rock a little bit
Great work Kah :)
Registered on May 31, 2009, 112 Posts, 1590 Comments
Comment posted by Dietrich Gloger on May 29, 2010 at 3:39 AM
Hard to decide Kah Kit, both are really eyecatching and appealing. I think I do prefer the secon one. Not only because of the light, but I like that the comp. appears more "open". Also the crop works really well. Interesting detail: The bird's orientation changes :wink:
Registered on January 26, 2007, 360 Posts, 9876 Comments
Comment posted by Ian Haskell on May 29, 2010 at 4:57 AM
Hi

I prefer the motion in the water in the first one too. The left hand side looks a bit darker in the second one too and the bird is facing out of frame. I would definately go with the first one.

Ian
Registered on October 30, 2008, 24 Posts, 673 Comments
Comment posted by Gary McGhee on May 29, 2010 at 8:25 AM
I think I prefer the second shot, The light looks so much better, I prefer the colour also. They are both great though Kah.

Gary.
Registered on April 15, 2010, 142 Posts, 2416 Comments
Comment posted by INGOMA on May 29, 2010 at 8:45 AM
This is stunning Kah Kit. I love both versions. Yes, the light is better in the second but it is still great in the first. I prefer the wider field of view of the first and of course the water motion. What really strikes me here is what difference the orientation of the bird makes - I prefer it pointing in the direction of the sunset. Overall great work and most of all I like how very realistic it looks.
Registered on July 2, 2004, 231 Posts, 3110 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Chambers on May 29, 2010 at 9:20 AM
Beautiful Kah Kit. I prefer the first version. The FG in the 2nd version seems a little disruptive.
Registered on April 10, 2005, 753 Posts, 21216 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on May 29, 2010 at 10:18 AM
Both of these are beautiful. I love the water in the first one, so like that one a little better. Nice work!

Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, Wi.
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by Ricardo La Piettra on May 29, 2010 at 11:07 AM
Great timing Kah Kit, love the texture of the water, not so soft, not so static. Light is beautiful, and the seabird on the rock is a great plus here. I prefer the first version without a doubt, it´s more dynamic. :toast:
Registered on July 22, 2009, 62 Posts, 730 Comments
Comment posted by Kurt Budliger on May 29, 2010 at 1:21 PM
Although the second is good (nice sky) I much prefer the first. I like my birds to be left leaning :biggrin:
Registered on June 11, 2006, 113 Posts, 2116 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Sogn on May 29, 2010 at 7:08 PM
Both versions are beautiful. I prefer the second as there is more detail in the distant rocks, and I like the softness and color of the light on the distant rocks better. I actually find the water motion in the first photograph distracting, pulling my eye downward and away from the beauty of the distant rock towers. I do like the direction of the bird in the first photo, but that could be changed.
Registered on January 17, 2007, 68 Posts, 210 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on May 29, 2010 at 7:29 PM
Wow, what an amazing moment you caught here! I like both, but the first is the easy winner for me (although i wish the bird were looking towards the sun as in the second :biggrin: ) due to the much better light and action in the waves. Terrific shot!
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on May 29, 2010 at 8:30 PM
What and incredible scene and perfectly handled light. Both are excellent, and you call it correctly that it's the motion in the first and the light in the second. My personal preference is the second one. However, to really make the perfect picture, I'd say clone the bird from the first into the second. It's a very strong focal point, and feel really perfect in the first image.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Bruce King on May 29, 2010 at 11:02 PM
Nice work. They're both keepers IMO, but I agree it's the first for sure. :toast:
Registered on January 14, 2010, 276 Posts, 2212 Comments
Comment posted by Kah Kit Yoong on May 29, 2010 at 11:22 PM
Thanks for the suggestions. I've included a stitch of the two images as a result.
Registered on September 27, 2006, 636 Posts, 10682 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Hartmann on May 30, 2010 at 12:27 AM
Sweet, now you have it going on! Nice work.

If I may nit, I would like the bird facing the setting sun.
Registered on January 15, 2009, 13 Posts, 772 Comments
Comment posted by David Edwards on May 30, 2010 at 5:32 AM
A beautiful image, Kah Kit. I much prefer the orginal version. It's overall tone and mood fit so well together. I like the water motion, and how there is no reference to the immediate shore line, so it looks like you're out in the sea. I hope you gave thanks to the gull :smile:
Great shot!
Registered on December 6, 2008, 142 Posts, 2623 Comments
Comment posted by Kah Kit Yoong on May 30, 2010 at 9:36 AM
Sorry here's hopefully the last version. I've been doing a bit of work on this tonight:)
Registered on September 27, 2006, 636 Posts, 10682 Comments
Comment posted by Younes Bounhar on May 30, 2010 at 10:34 AM
It really is a tough call to pick between the two...then again, you don't have to since you've taken both :).
Great light! beautifully captured. The first has a slight edge in term of composition I think.
Registered on November 25, 2007, 81 Posts, 1234 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on May 30, 2010 at 12:46 PM
Kah,

A grand seascape to be sure - perhaps even encroaching upon epic? maybe? :-) Ya know, watching the iterations go by now, some times you just can't beat your first impression. I personally like the first version the best. As a couple have said, I like the wave action and motion in that one and while the sky is fantastic, it's not a competitor, if that makes sense.

Now if I had to pick another version it would be the second to last. The 4th version I think the color variation in the water from green to purple is stronger than any of the others. And in all the subsequest alternates, I think the blue in the sky is a bit on the electric side. Just an opinion of course, but I think the blue sky in the last two kind of detract a little from the rest of the scene.

Oh, and I like the seagull facing the sun too. :wink:

Lastly, I like the warmth in the original too. Fantastic seascape.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Lundh on May 30, 2010 at 12:49 PM
That fourth one looks AMAZING! Great light, shutter speed, everything. A small nit from me would be that the rock on which that gull is perched is a bit dark on the top half. Do you have any more detail in that from another exposure? You dont need much more detail there, just a tad.
Registered on April 28, 2004, 774 Posts, 4351 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on May 30, 2010 at 3:25 PM
I wouldn't be into this much if not for the tiny bird. Small subject, huge impact IMO. I'm very slightly partial to the first one with a bit more brightness and luminosity added to the sky.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Emmanuel Coupe on May 30, 2010 at 6:25 PM
Although in the 2nd the bird looks away and I like that, it doesn't quite have the nice water movement the others do. I would go with the 4th. Nicely seen and captured all four.
Registered on March 17, 2007, 83 Posts, 341 Comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on May 30, 2010 at 6:31 PM
Tough choice, so why does one even have to choose? Both are great shots with a different feel for each.
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments
Comment posted by Kah Kit Yoong on May 30, 2010 at 8:55 PM
"I wouldn't be into this much if not for the tiny bird. Small subject, huge impact IMO."

Absolutely Marc. I wouldn't have taken the shot without the bird. I'm fascinated by the responses about which way the bird faces. My initial thought was better looking into the frame, as if gazing towards the rock stacks but on further reflection, perhaps looking out towards the sunset may be better.
Registered on September 27, 2006, 636 Posts, 10682 Comments
Comment posted by Jimmy Gekas on May 31, 2010 at 1:38 AM
What an awesome seascape, Kah Kit! I prefer the second to last one, if I have to make a choice. I agree that the bird makes an immediate focal point in the amazing scene. I do like the bird facing the sun, though. Sweet shot all around. :toast:
Registered on July 26, 2007, 244 Posts, 2807 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Baumbach on May 31, 2010 at 12:03 PM
The first version is still the best in my book.

- Dan.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 473 Posts, 7980 Comments
Comment posted by Nicolaus Wegner on May 31, 2010 at 12:10 PM
Awesome photo! The first one is great.
Registered on February 21, 2010, 133 Posts, 1509 Comments
Comment posted by John Lehmkuhl on May 31, 2010 at 1:46 PM
1ST version rocks my boat - the 4th looks a tad too over-worked.
Registered on May 22, 2005, 165 Posts, 2008 Comments
Comment posted by Nicolas Belokurov on May 31, 2010 at 2:31 PM
I really like the 2nd version, the bird just has some place to fly away from that rock.
Wonderful shot.
Registered on July 22, 2009, 41 Posts, 533 Comments
Comment posted by Balakumar Kaushik on June 1, 2010 at 1:28 PM
Lovely image. Amazing wave patterns. Somehow still like the first post. The bird makes all the difference as said above.
:toast: :toast:
Registered on January 4, 2008, 98 Posts, 1403 Comments