Gallery: LandscapePosted June 5, 2010606 views45 comments
Mount Cook, New Zealand
This is the landscape version of a vertical image I presented a month or two ago. I've included the latter photo for comparison, which I have incidentally completely reworked.
Comments
45 comments
Comment posted by Kah Kit Yoong on June 5, 2010 at 9:04 PM
And the reworked vertical.
Registered on September 27, 2006, 636 Posts, 10682 Comments
Comment posted by Mike Bohlander on June 5, 2010 at 9:20 PM
I'm partial to this horizontal version. Comp is very well balanced, has lots of depth, and the mix of colors in the scene is great. Nice work!
Registered on August 22, 2008, 14 Posts, 125 Comments
Comment posted by Ben Horne on June 5, 2010 at 9:22 PM
The horizontal has a much more calm feel to it. The vertical feels stretched, which adds visual tension. The reflected light on the stream is very interesting.
Registered on August 27, 2009, 51 Posts, 959 Comments
Comment posted by Nicolaus Wegner on June 5, 2010 at 9:30 PM
Looks great man. Very dramatic scene with lots to look at. I prefer the vertical.
Registered on February 21, 2010, 133 Posts, 1509 Comments
Comment posted by Eva McDermott on June 5, 2010 at 9:35 PM
My preference is the horizontal version Kah. There also seems to be a little more reflected color off the water. Love the expanse of lichen covered boulders and the touch of light on the left peaks..
Registered on January 4, 2009, 1015 Posts, 13229 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel Ewert on June 5, 2010 at 10:32 PM
Awesome drama here. The landscape version seems to be more powerful than the vertical, imo. Great work, Kah.
Registered on June 2, 2009, 103 Posts, 1500 Comments
Comment posted by Gabi Lach on June 5, 2010 at 10:46 PM
These look great, Kah. It looks like the skies were on fire, very wild. I prefer the vertical shot, it looks more balanced, better composition. Even depth shows better there, I think.
Registered on May 1, 2007, 101 Posts, 3187 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on June 5, 2010 at 10:48 PM
Landscape version: WOW! Vertical version: WOW! Not much more I can say! Really exceptional presentations here. I might have a small preference towards the landscape.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Jason Woerly on June 5, 2010 at 11:08 PM
Both are spectacular, but I'm partial to the landscape version.
Registered on May 4, 2006, 8 Posts, 101 Comments
Comment posted by Kurt Budliger on June 6, 2010 at 12:19 AM
I'm speechless, both are stunning but preferring the the landscape
Registered on June 11, 2006, 113 Posts, 2116 Comments
Comment posted by Stuart Williams on June 6, 2010 at 1:04 AM
there's more drama to the vertical but plenty of visual interest to the horizontal. the touch of sunlight in the top left is wonderfully appealing. I'm not overly keen on the milky threatment of the water but you may have been constrained.
Registered on December 7, 2007, 247 Posts, 4792 Comments
Comment posted by Mat Malone on June 6, 2010 at 1:28 AM
Both are incredibly beautiful. It would be silly for me to pick the better one.
Registered on December 15, 2008, 91 Posts, 882 Comments
Comment posted by Andreas Resch on June 6, 2010 at 2:33 AM
Wow, that's a great one, Kah. The light is spectacular and your processing supports that very well. Both versions have their own appeal. The landscape one is more majestic while the portrait one is more dynamic. If I had to pick one, I would go for landscape as it makes me feel a little more like being in the place there.
Registered on November 14, 2007, 322 Posts, 6101 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on June 6, 2010 at 2:49 AM
Man, theyre both killer--but i prefer the horizontal, the dichotomy from left to right is more daring and engaging. Sweet stuff!
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by R.Bill Moser on June 6, 2010 at 3:01 AM
My prefernce is the horizontal version.......but I do like them both. Awesome drama. the light and colors are mazing. The vertical shows the depth better.
Registered on January 29, 2010, 285 Posts, 4281 Comments
Comment posted by Kenn Leonhardt on June 6, 2010 at 3:32 AM
Stunning either way, but I prefer the wider vista of the landscape version.
Registered on March 29, 2008, 27 Posts, 1710 Comments
Comment posted by Danny Laureys on June 6, 2010 at 5:03 AM
I like both versions, but i'm leaning a bit more to the landscape version.
Registered on January 5, 2008, 590 Posts, 1261 Comments
Comment posted by INGOMA on June 6, 2010 at 10:45 AM
Wonderful drama here, Kah Kit. I lean towards the horizontal version - it is a more expansive view and gives more of a sense of place. Awesome shots!
Registered on July 2, 2004, 231 Posts, 3110 Comments
Comment posted by Dietrich Gloger on June 6, 2010 at 11:16 AM
I do prefer the horizontal. I think it is the stronger image overall. Maybe because the fg is better. In the vertical there is some empty space at the bottom right corner which is not adding much. This one here is more entertaining and engaging for me.
Registered on January 26, 2007, 360 Posts, 9876 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Chamberlain on June 6, 2010 at 11:34 AM
It's a tough call. There are some things in the vertical that I like a lot. Mainly the blues and open spaces in the sky, and the extended foreground. But, I still think i'm leaning toward this horizontal version just a tad. I'm partial to this format, I think. Both are outstanding.
Chris
Registered on March 13, 2007, 500 Posts, 8365 Comments
Comment posted by Ricardo La Piettra on June 6, 2010 at 12:09 PM
Landscape for sure Kah, amazing scene.
I´m seeing clipped yellows and reds in my monitor in the vertical version, but maybe is my lcd.
Both are great anyways
Registered on July 22, 2009, 62 Posts, 730 Comments
Comment posted by Guy Tal on June 6, 2010 at 12:24 PM
This is just amazing, Kah Kit! Dramatic and enthralling. Wish I could be there to experience it in person.
Guy
Registered on November 1, 2003, 566 Posts, 15507 Comments
Comment posted by Eric Petit on June 6, 2010 at 12:25 PM
I like both, nice mix of cold and warm colors. Thanks for sharing.
Registered on April 27, 2010, 2 Posts, 36 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Windom on June 6, 2010 at 12:55 PM
One of the great things about NPN is seeing imagery from places around the world that many of us will never have the chance to see and this is a great example of that.
I prefer the vertical as it places more emphasis on the sky which is the most dramatic part of the image. Great work!
Registered on November 1, 2003, 176 Posts, 2302 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on June 6, 2010 at 2:48 PM
Kah Kit,
Both are beautiful mountain landscapes, and each different. Some common threads in the comments that I can only echo. I prefer the landscape for it's grand view, and a well balanced comp left to right. The vertical is more dynamic as has been said, but I find it creates a bit more tension with the glorious sky and the lovely stream and reflections of light both competing for attention. Both are magnificent on their own.
Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Eric Good on June 6, 2010 at 4:15 PM
What a dramatic shot! I prefer the comp of the landscape image and for the added detail in the cloud highlights. Great stuff!
Registered on March 17, 2007, 116 Posts, 4764 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on June 6, 2010 at 4:45 PM
Wow! WOW! What a fantastic nature photograph.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Bruno Silva on June 6, 2010 at 5:06 PM
both versions::::.WOW!! great work kah!!!!
Registered on May 6, 2009, 132 Posts, 1406 Comments
Comment posted by Anthony Vincent on June 6, 2010 at 6:04 PM
My only wish is that I couldn't have been there to witness this. wow just gorgeous, Kah Kit.
You brought back some great shots, well done
Registered on February 5, 2009, 199 Posts, 2775 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Marcellini on June 6, 2010 at 6:21 PM
The landscape edges out for the more significant color contrasts and actually the better handling of highlights in the clouds. It just catches my eye as a more dramatic image. Love those tones in the water.
Registered on November 27, 2007, 250 Posts, 2468 Comments
Comment posted by Jeremy Kessler on June 6, 2010 at 8:00 PM
Amazing. That some incredible light, I think I might prefer the vertical, but they are both gorgeous.
Registered on September 13, 2007, 36 Posts, 1283 Comments
Comment posted by Jeffrey Hak Kan Le on June 6, 2010 at 8:43 PM
HI KK,
I think this is awesome on this landsccape version. I like the red cast you had in here. Probably I had been here before in 2009 and looks like MT cook is not easy to see the entire peak without cloud cover in this areas. Congrat.
www.jeffreyhklee.com
Registered on January 9, 2007, 42 Posts, 157 Comments
Comment posted by Michael R Reynolds on June 6, 2010 at 11:32 PM
KIt, wonderful light and composition. I didn't see your origianl post, but the horizontal works nicely. No nits here. Best Regards.
Registered on February 26, 2008, 54 Posts, 812 Comments
Comment posted by Raymond Marlow on June 6, 2010 at 11:53 PM
between the milk water and the sky its an amazing image to say the least great work here.
Registered on October 15, 2008, 158 Posts, 531 Comments
Comment posted by Winnie Ho on June 7, 2010 at 3:42 AM
Just a note that the water is actually milky in appearance due to the glacial rock "flour" sediment.
Registered on January 6, 2008, 93 Posts, 1788 Comments
Comment posted by Anish Desai on June 7, 2010 at 9:27 AM
I like the horizontal version, but prefer the vertical as to me it isolates and showcases the most effective parts within the horizontal composition (the blazing sky and milky stream). Both are lovely, nonetheless, and this certainly must have been an incredible sight.
Registered on May 23, 2009, 49 Posts, 410 Comments
Comment posted by Luis Argerich on June 7, 2010 at 9:59 AM
Amazing progression in this image, love every single detail I can see.
Registered on December 22, 2009, 91 Posts, 1349 Comments
Comment posted by Adrian Klein on June 7, 2010 at 5:58 PM
Both are great Kah but I would say the landscape works better for me. What an amazing scene and sky to go with it. Captured and processed to your usual great standards.
Registered on June 10, 2007, 112 Posts, 1506 Comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on June 7, 2010 at 6:46 PM
Both are grand landscape shots. Dramatic light, great color, and excellent comps.
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments
Comment posted by Michael J Greene, on June 7, 2010 at 7:02 PM
wow! Incredible work Kah. This is jaw dropping! Do you mind sharing the technical details and how you processed? Thanks so much!
Registered on June 18, 2009, 86 Posts, 2317 Comments
Comment posted by Reed Bowman on June 7, 2010 at 7:40 PM
Kah, they both have their own beauty. The sky in the vertical is awesome and I love the comp, the way the boulders march a diagonal line across the stream. However, I love the touch of light on the mountains (ul) in the horizontal...just not sure that little magic is enough to best the vertical... both are well done...I once trout fished near there
Registered on March 2, 2009, 166 Posts, 1058 Comments
Comment posted by Kent Mearig on June 7, 2010 at 11:00 PM
The contrast between warm and cool is a little too centered for me in the horizontal version. In the vertical, that transition line is nicely angled and has some curves even. I do enjoy the light on the mountains and slightly less flamboyant sky of the horizontal photo.
Registered on September 4, 2006, 237 Posts, 4748 Comments
Comment posted by Kah Kit Yoong on June 8, 2010 at 2:28 AM
Thanks so much for the critiques. My personal preference is for the vertical and I was unsure how appealing the horizontal is. Looks like that question has been answered.
Regarding the milky water, that's the way glacial water looks in these parts, nothing to do with exposure time.
Michael, both images were shot single exposure, f14, 1.3s, ISO 100, 2 stop hard GND filter. I used double-processed the RAW to get the best looking 'exposure' possible then the usual layers for curves, levels, vibrance, locally adjusted using masks.
Registered on September 27, 2006, 636 Posts, 10682 Comments
Comment posted by Anil Rao on June 8, 2010 at 3:34 AM
Outstanding perspective and loads of drama here. Although both versions are lovely, I prefer the horizontal one because of the expanded view. Really nice work, Kah. I am glad I didn't miss this post.
Registered on November 15, 2003, 234 Posts, 4923 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Gin on June 20, 2010 at 10:29 PM
Stunning shot, love everything about this!
Registered on October 13, 2008, 6 Posts, 43 Comments
Comments
45 commentsChris
I´m seeing clipped yellows and reds in my monitor in the vertical version, but maybe is my lcd.
Both are great anyways
Guy
I prefer the vertical as it places more emphasis on the sky which is the most dramatic part of the image. Great work!
Both are beautiful mountain landscapes, and each different. Some common threads in the comments that I can only echo. I prefer the landscape for it's grand view, and a well balanced comp left to right. The vertical is more dynamic as has been said, but I find it creates a bit more tension with the glorious sky and the lovely stream and reflections of light both competing for attention. Both are magnificent on their own.
Lon
You brought back some great shots, well done
I think this is awesome on this landsccape version. I like the red cast you had in here. Probably I had been here before in 2009 and looks like MT cook is not easy to see the entire peak without cloud cover in this areas. Congrat.
www.jeffreyhklee.com
Regarding the milky water, that's the way glacial water looks in these parts, nothing to do with exposure time.
Michael, both images were shot single exposure, f14, 1.3s, ISO 100, 2 stop hard GND filter. I used double-processed the RAW to get the best looking 'exposure' possible then the usual layers for curves, levels, vibrance, locally adjusted using masks.