Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
ISO WHAT???
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

ISO WHAT???

by Brad Hill

Gallery: WildlifePosted June 8, 2010478 views20 comments
I've just returned from leading my annual "Grizzlies of the Khutzeymateen" Instructional Photo Tour. As always, the trip was a resounding success and all participants (including me) returned with cherished memories (and a few photographs, of course! :wink: ).

Because I already have thousands of bear images, I decided to do a few things differently on my Khutzeymateen trip this year. I resisted the urge to go the easy route and forced myself to shoot prime lenses almost exclusively - and primarily my newish 400mm f2.8 VR. There's no doubt in my mind that if you're a Nikon shooter the single BEST lens to take into the Khuzeymateen is the very popular 200-400mm f4 VR, but I really wanted to see what my fast prime 400mm VR could really do (both "native" and with the 1.4x and the new 2x teleconverters). And, I wanted to push my D3s to see what it could really do, especially in the high ISO end.

I nabbed this image after the sun had gone behind a mountain and light was faltering. The bear is a 4 or 5-year old female grizzly with a beautiful blond face. She was very approachable and, as a matter of fact, because she's approaching breeding age and there were several uhhhh...well...amorous...males around, she seemed most relaxed when she approached US (apparently we were less scary for her than the big male bears). I was quite close to this female when when I shot this (it's virtually full-frame) with my 400mm lens. Between my proximity to the subject (with the associated need to stop down to get the critical portions of the bear and foreground in focus) and the fact that I needed a fairly high shutter speed to get a sharp image with the very weighty lens I was hand-holding, I decided to just let the ISO go! So...waning sunlight and I'm shooting a long lens stopped down to f11 at a shutter speed of 1/1000s. The ISO? Are you sitting down? ISO 12,800. AND, most critically, I have performed NO noise reduction on this image* other than the default values on my raw converter. While the background has SOME discernible noise, it's very minor and could be handled in seconds with any number of noise reduction products (Noise Ninja, etc.). To say that I was shocked by the quality of the output is an understatement!

When I talk to many nature photographers they often tell me they don't often shoot in low light and thus don't need one of the new full-frame high ISO wonder machines (and they often say they can't "afford" to lose the 50% increase in effective magnification when going from a cropped sensor Nikon to a full-frame one). But what I think they're really missing out on is that having a camera that can perform well at high ISO settings gives you SO MUCH MORE CONTROL OVER YOUR APERTURE (and depth of field), which is one of the few things wildlife photographers can control in a field setting. Plus, it ends up being a whole lot easier to get to shutter speeds where you can hand-hold big lenses that you couldn't before. If I was limited to ISO 800 (or even lower) when capturing this shot I likely would have had to open up the aperture so much that I would have been struggling to keep both the eyes and nose in focus (and I couldn't even have dreamt of keeping that foreground sharp).

Subject: Adult female grizzly (Ursus arctos) chowing down after sunset
Location: Khutzeymateen Inlet, BC, Canada
Camera: Nikon D3s
Lens: 400mm f2.8 VR - hand-held
Exposure: 1/1000s @ f11; ISO 12,800; -0.3 stop exposure compensation from metered exposure setting.
Crop: Negligible. This is about 90% of full fram

All comments and critiques welcome, but probably better to view larger image first. Bear in mind (pun intended) this was simply a test shot to see what I could get from ridiculous ISO settings...

Cheers...

Brad

*NOTE: The act of reducing an image in size and resolution inherently removes some image noise. Slighly more noise is visible in the larger version of this image (click on the main image to see the largest version), but even the full-frame image is remarkable noise-freee. Feel free to contact me if you like me to provide you with a full resolution version of the image to assess image noise.

Comments

20 comments
Comment posted by Neil Rossmiller on June 8, 2010 at 3:29 PM
:eek: (NPN needs a jaw drop little thingy for this one) :wink:
At any rate, Welcome back, Brad!
This is a stunning example of the possibilities for the latest batch of sensors. Not to diminish talent, but this opens the possibility of shooting in available darkness :biggrin: .
Looking forward to more (not test) images from your trip.
Neil
Registered on October 30, 2009, 156 Posts, 749 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel & Loana on June 8, 2010 at 3:58 PM
Very nice shot. And incredible result at ISO12800!

Looking forward to see more from your tour.

D&L
Registered on October 7, 2008, 166 Posts, 3044 Comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on June 8, 2010 at 4:08 PM
Brad,

Glad you made it back alive! This is really impressive not both technicaly but the image as well. Such an innocent amusing expression with the grass hanging out of the mouth it surely would have been a treat to experience this. Imagine the detail you could have gotten on the face with the 2X attached!

I have two questions:
1: what role does the lens play in noise on an image like this (obviously f/stop plays a role with its involvement in SS and need for higher ISO)
2: what is the colored splotch directly to the right of the nose and under the right eye? Is it a grass stain?

- Luke
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on June 8, 2010 at 4:23 PM
Hi Luke,

No problem making it back alive - had my most dicey bear encounter ever yesterday - once I was home (try controlling two dogs when you've accidentally and simultaneously stumbled on a coyote den full of pups and and angry mom and then a mad mother bear with two cubs climbs down a nearby tree - sheesh!! And yes, I did get charged by ma bear. I have to go back to the grizzlies where it's safe!!).

You asked:
What role does the lens play in noise on an image like this (obviously f/stop plays a role with its involvement in SS and need for higher ISO)?

I'm not sure what role the lens plays in directly affecting noise - seems to me that the noise is a function of turning the "gain" up and amplifying both the weak signal and the fixed amount of noise per photosite. I can't think of a reason why the lens's sharpness or resolving power would have any affect on this. But if anyone else can come up with a reason I'm all ears. If I'm missing the gist of your question let me know...

And you asked:
What is the colored splotch directly to the right of the nose and under the right eye? Is it a grass stain?

This is easy: Yep - grass stain.

Cheers...

Brad

Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Eric Petit on June 8, 2010 at 5:31 PM
Stunning !!! :toast:
Registered on April 27, 2010, 2 Posts, 36 Comments
Comment posted by Upjeet Singh on June 8, 2010 at 6:27 PM
Brad this is one marvelous Image, Specially this being shot at ISO 12,800 and such clarity stunning. Also the innocent looks while it has some grass blades left for chewing really add to the image for me.

D3s is indeed setting very high standards and I think its time for me to switch over to Nikon now.

Well done. :toast:
Upjeet
Registered on May 8, 2010, 50 Posts, 55 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Walters on June 8, 2010 at 7:19 PM
Amazing image! Like the head turn and the eyes really give this bear a personality. Like the grass in the mouth as well.
Registered on October 30, 2005, 405 Posts, 3693 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on June 8, 2010 at 7:51 PM
Brad, this makes it hard to tolerate my "back order" status! Simply marvelous.
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by Jeff Loomis on June 9, 2010 at 12:01 PM
Wow! :eek: This is really awesome, and thanks for the education on low light photography. I know the camera is fantastic, but the skill, framing, and technique cannot be ignored either. Since you said it is 90% of full frame, I wonder if you could give her just a little more space on the right.
Registered on January 26, 2010, 68 Posts, 719 Comments
Comment posted by Kurt Bowman on June 9, 2010 at 12:28 PM
Excellent capture Brad! Very impressive at ISO 12,800. This makes me want to try out my high ISOs on the MIV and see if it even comes close. I might need to go on one of you photo tours if I can ever scrape togther the cash. :toast:
Registered on June 19, 2008, 1005 Posts, 8028 Comments
Comment posted by Roger Hayden on June 9, 2010 at 1:19 PM
Great shot, Brad, especially considering the conditions, equipment and settings. It appears high ISO capabilities, as well as VR, are revolutionizing wildlife photography. Last week, I talked to a pro Nikon shooter, who makes huge prints. He was trying out the D3x with 24 megapixels. With the high ISO, he says he can shoot in low light as never before AND get huge gallery-grade prints with the higher resolution. Pretty amazing stuff.
Registered on November 21, 2009, 41 Posts, 201 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on June 9, 2010 at 1:39 PM
Beautiful shot. Great work shooting this one Brad. Really enjoy looking at this.

Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, Wi
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by Guy Runco on June 9, 2010 at 2:39 PM
Great shot Brad, and welcome back! Color's great, nice and sharp and the facial expression is priceless, looking forward to seeing more from your trip!

:toast:
Registered on September 9, 2008, 77 Posts, 705 Comments
Comment posted by John Tobias on June 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM
I'll take a test shot of this caliber any day! Great shot. Thanks for the story behind the photo.
Registered on September 12, 2009, 2120 Posts, 6455 Comments
Comment posted by Ajit Huilgol on June 9, 2010 at 11:15 PM
Welcome back, Brad! Yes, cameras like this can take you where no man has gone before! Talk of the extended time this gives you in the wild! Mindblowing! :toast:
Registered on December 19, 2008, 302 Posts, 2055 Comments
Comment posted by Clinton Bauder on June 10, 2010 at 2:03 PM
Very nice Brad. Interestingly while I can see some noise in the image the tonal range and overall color of the image still looks great. On my D200 when I start to shoot at "high" ISOs like 800 the images turn out looking really flat and posterized. This doesn't look that way at all.
Registered on December 8, 2009, 31 Posts, 231 Comments
Comment posted by Cam Barlow on June 11, 2010 at 12:35 AM
I wish I would have had 2 bodies when I went on this trip as I shot a 300 prime which at times was too much. It would have been nice to have a second body with my 70-200 attached so I did not have to waste time switching lenses. It also would have been nice to have a body capable of high ISO like yours. Most of my shots were shot at f/2.8 or f/4 and like you mentioned it is very difficult to keep the whole face in focus. I definately learned a few things for, hopefully, the next time I go back. I would even rent a second body or purchase a second body with better high ISO capabilities and sell it when I got back if I had to.
Registered on July 13, 2009, 5 Posts, 11 Comments
Comment posted by Marsel van Oosten on June 11, 2010 at 11:01 AM
That's pretty amazing. After all this time shooting with a D3, I still have to get used to be able to shoot at high ISO without any problems. I'd like to add that noise will be more obvious the moment it gets darker. Shooting the same scene at the same ISO, with with less light, will show much more noise.

I like the shot as well - the grass is a real bonus. I'd prefer to see a little more space on the left, but that's hardly a nit. Thanks for sharing!
Registered on March 9, 2004, 285 Posts, 2277 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hackley on June 11, 2010 at 1:18 PM
That is really an amazing image considering the ISO, should be interesting to see what Nikon comes out with in the next few years. I am currently saving for a D700 just for the reasons you stated. The look of the bear with the grass really makes this shot, well done.
Registered on September 17, 2009, 302 Posts, 5535 Comments
Comment posted by Muhammad Zaid Wani on August 7, 2010 at 11:48 AM
Brad,

This is an amazing shot! The camera you're using is just an amazing piece of equipment! I really love your posts! :smile:

- Zaid
Registered on August 18, 2005, 23 Posts, 1406 Comments