One of my favourite things about photographing bears is that after being in the company of them for awhile it becomes clear that each has its own personality. Some are bold and aggressive, others curious and playful. This adult female was quite shy and wary and seemed very reticent to ever show her eyes. She was always lurking, but almost always watched us from behind objects that obscured her eyes, which - more often than not - was usually long blades of grass.
I decided I wanted to capture an image of her in a pose that was suggestive of her personality, which meant that I wanted to capture her shy, reclusive nature. I thought showing her in the deep grass in which she liked to "hide" (and eat, of course) with much of her obscured would be just the ticket. Of course, I wanted to capture her beautiful eyes, and I did want both of them unobscured by the grasses. Which meant I had to wait (and wait, and wait!). But, eventually, she looked up just enough to give a clear view of both eyes and I captured this image. This shot will always remind me of this particularly beautiful but particularly shy female grizzly!
Those who know my work and thoughts on wildlife photography will already know that I often don't like images that have multiple out-of-focus zones in them. But this is one of those cases where I had to compromise a little and be willing to throw away my own biases. In this image I REALLY wanted the eyes to pop so I decided I wanted them to be the sharpest element in the image, with everything else somewhat softer. So I opened up the aperture on my 400mm f2.8 VR fully, even though I knew that meant the foreground grass would be rendered somewhat out-of-focus. I also knew that because the background vegetation was much further away from my focal point (compared to the foreground grass) that it would be rendered much softer than the foreground grass. Which meant that there would still be only one easily recognized sharpness gradient in the image, but that those eyes would just pop! Of course, shooting this image from a very low angle was critical to making it work - I shot this one from my knees (no, I wasn't praying) to ensure the camera would be on the same level as the bear's eyes.
A final technical note: This is the kind of shot where it's critical that your camera (or lens) has a manual over-ride on the autofocus system. While the right eye of the bear (left side on this image) is totally unobscured by vegetation and it is what I chose to focus on, the grass immediately below the eye was overlapping on the focus bracket I was using and confusing the AF system a little. I always leave my AF switch on my super-telephotos on the "M/A" setting, which means that when you have to over-ride the system your manual adjustment takes priority over the AF system. I did have to use the over-ride for this shot, and the manual over-ride setting worked like a charm!
Subject: Female grizzly (
Ursus arctos) shyly peeking out from deep grass
Location: Khutzeymateen Inlet, BC, Canada
Camera: Nikon D3s
Lens: 400mm f2.8 VR) - hand-held
Exposure: 1/500s @ f2.8; ISO 800; -0.33 stop compensation from matrix-metered exposure setting of camera.
All the contextual information surrounding this shot (including processing details) can be found here:
http://www.naturalart.ca/galleries/latest/detail_4.html.
All comments and critiques welcome, but probably better to view larger image first.
Oh, and by the way, I KNOW there's a few out-of-focus grass blades obscuring parts of the face and that I COULD clone them out. Feel free to tell me if they distract you, but I'm not likely to give in to suggestions to remove them!
Cheers...
Brad
Comments
17 commentsI have not spent as much time in the Fauna Gallery as I should have so I am not familiar with your thoughts on multi out of focus zones. I would be curious ro read them if you can direct me. Having the FG grasses our of focus seems absolutely the right choice to me because it is how our brain processes real life. We look past the grass to see the bear and this conveys that. Were it in focus it would compete. Were the BG grasses of the same focus as the FG ones that would work too, but I like this "as is".
Would NOT clone out the grasses.
Good stuff!
Peter
I think your patience on this one was well worth it. Before I even read your description I was thinking about how this was a shy bear peeking out from behind the grass. Absolutely perfect how the one blade of grass comes over the left eye. Lots of personality here. Love it!
Clinton
Ken Archer
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, Wi
A very expressive shot again, I like it very much. The grass blades on the shy face of the bear are important elements of the image.
István Pénzes
Győr, Hungary
Great details and expressive eyes! If this was mine, I might be temped to clone out just one blade (may be partially) above the right eye.
Jagdeep Rajput
Brad, you know that I couldn't care less about multiple out-of-focus zones, and I don't care here either.
I'm also not bothered by the oof grass obscuring parts of the face - as a matter of fact: I think cloning them away will ruin the concept behind the shot.
But what MOOF zones are to you, ears are to me. Most mammals have a tendency to move their ears a lot, and independent from each other. They often look in one direction and point at least one ear in another. It's obvious animals are clueless about photography, otherwise they would know that it doesn't look as nice as having both ears pointing up and forward (unless it's a very specific expression you want to capture of course). My first thought here was therefore: too bad the left ear is pointing to the left. On second thought however, the left eye is also looking to the left, and that's kind of neat; the left half of the face is pointing to the left, the right half is looking straight at the camera. I guess this is just my way of saying: great shot!