Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Reserved
‹ PreviousFlora GalleryNext ›

Reserved

by Charles Younger

Gallery: FloraPosted July 3, 201087 views16 comments
D200
180mm macro w/extension
ISO 200, f5.6, 1/50

Charles
Dushore, Pa.

Comments

16 comments
Comment posted by Miro Susta on July 3, 2010 at 3:43 AM
Simple but nice image. Left part a bit OOF. :wink:
Registered on August 18, 2006, 719 Posts, 3736 Comments
Comment posted by Charles Younger on July 3, 2010 at 3:54 AM
Thank you, Miro. Yes it is.
Registered on January 15, 2010, 151 Posts, 269 Comments
Comment posted by Steven M Kahn on July 3, 2010 at 4:00 AM
Talk about leaving things in the eye of the beholder.... I am not sure I see reserved. I see being all warpped up. The angles of the subjects adds to the dynamic feeling to this capture. Excellent POF/DOF and the muted background makes the subjects pop. :toast:
Registered on July 20, 2009, 140 Posts, 1198 Comments
Comment posted by Charles Younger on July 3, 2010 at 4:09 AM
Steven,

My logic was a bit circuitous on this one. I kept trying to understand the sequence of events that led to this leaf ending up in this position. I finally just gave up and offered myself the explanation that the spot had just been "reserved" for it.
Registered on January 15, 2010, 151 Posts, 269 Comments
Comment posted by Balakumar Kaushik on July 3, 2010 at 5:29 AM
Simple and elegant image. Liked the way the dry leaf has wrapped itself to the stem holding on tightly to it. Nice clean BG to go with.
:toast:
Registered on January 4, 2008, 98 Posts, 1403 Comments
Comment posted by John&Patty Benway on July 3, 2010 at 7:00 AM
I really like the soft colors, and it has a delicate look that is very appealing, good eye Charles, I like this very much.
John
Registered on May 12, 2006, 626 Posts, 8700 Comments
Comment posted by John Kerr on July 3, 2010 at 7:39 AM
First nice focus and detail on the stem and leaf along with a wonderful creamy BG. And second, great capture of another curious act of Nature. Great eye.
Registered on October 28, 2009, 111 Posts, 1070 Comments
Comment posted by Doug Benner on July 3, 2010 at 8:09 AM
I really like this type of approach. You've found interest and beauty in an unusual subject. Nicely done.
Registered on December 8, 2003, 482 Posts, 1868 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel & Loana on July 3, 2010 at 8:12 AM
Simple and very nice shot; well seen!

D&L
Registered on October 7, 2008, 166 Posts, 3044 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Fach on July 3, 2010 at 8:48 AM
Charles: Fascinating find and a solid comp. The traditionalist in me would like to see the entire stem and the seed heads sharp. I think it would give the image more resonance. >=))>
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1805 Posts, 26981 Comments
Comment posted by Charles Younger on July 3, 2010 at 9:28 AM
I know what you mean, BIll. I guess I'll have to start stacking images if I want to achieve that much DOF while maintaining backgrounds such as this. As it is I kind of like that the in and out-of-focus, vertical and horizontal, seed heads exist in different realms with the curled leaf being a bond between them.
Registered on January 15, 2010, 151 Posts, 269 Comments
Comment posted by Philip Southard on July 3, 2010 at 11:23 PM
Neat find Charles. Well seen and captured. Fantastic BG. :cool:
Registered on July 15, 2007, 258 Posts, 3892 Comments
Comment posted by Pat Sampson on July 4, 2010 at 12:05 AM
I like this one a lot Charles. Great bg and I like the simple elegant composition. Beautiful work.

pat
Registered on May 19, 2007, 953 Posts, 15989 Comments
Comment posted by Patricia Brundage on July 4, 2010 at 5:17 AM
The puzzle of trying to figure out how this leaf ended up wrapped around this stem is the essence of this image. The image itself is well composed with the oof background bringing the attention to the scene. The mentioned oof branch to the left could be solved by just removing or partially removing the one seed pod on the end, but the branch itself should be left in because it balances the composition. :toast:
Registered on March 23, 2006, 1111 Posts, 6531 Comments
Comment posted by Mike Gallo on July 4, 2010 at 4:56 PM
Simple yet leaves a lot to think about..............very well seen Charles
Registered on September 14, 2005, 182 Posts, 1471 Comments
Comment posted by Catherine Reilly on July 8, 2010 at 4:19 AM
I have to ditto exactly what Patricia said. In addition, what an elegant image!
Registered on August 16, 2006, 603 Posts, 9192 Comments