Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Amplexing cane toads
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Amplexing cane toads

by Crystal Kelehear

Gallery: WildlifePosted September 8, 201055 views7 comments
I photographed this male cane toad amplexing a female in the Northern Territory of Australia. I like the golden detail in the eyes and find them quite pretty... I don't know many people who find beauty in the face of a cane toad!

D300; Nikkor 105mm Micro; f5.6; 1/80; on camera flash; handheld.

Comments

7 comments
Comment posted by Ákos Lumnitzer on September 8, 2010 at 6:02 AM
Hey
I like the composition very much; the eye level view is very intimate. For me the only thing that may provide a better comp would have been to have less space on top and more below to give room to the remainder of the unseen parts of the lady toad. If you used the flash as main light, thus ignoring the ambient exposure (which is what I often do while shooting close-ups; see my Whipsnake in the following thread) I stop right down to maximize my depth of field, though knowing how these toads are probably a fair bit larger than my normal subjects, the extra DOF may not have helped achieve a bit more sharpness in the face of the female.

Good work on this Crystal. I only remember seeing these guys in Hungary when I were a wee lad, but have no qualms about admiring the beauty of even an introduced, ugly beast such as these toads. To me frogs are always smiling. I was fortunate to photograph (and see) my first Blue Mountains Tree Frog (Litoria citropa) last Saturday night.
Registered on April 24, 2004, 25 Posts, 510 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on September 8, 2010 at 11:05 AM
Hi Crystal,

Yes, those eyes are quite compelling - the gold flecks come thru very nicely. I also like the detail on the nose and mouth region of the male. In terms of the crop - I'm in agreement with Ákos about possibly having a little less space on top and more on the bottom (hopefully your original will allow this).

Cheers...thanks for sharing this...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Teller on September 8, 2010 at 7:07 PM
the color is great and so is the comp. I can almost feel the muck you must have been in or very near.
Registered on August 23, 2010, 1162 Posts, 6692 Comments
Comment posted by Angela McCain on September 8, 2010 at 9:16 PM
I like your image. Thank you for a new word in my vocabulary. Amplexing. Looked it up and can't believe I had never heard the term. Amplexing :biggrin:
Registered on April 19, 2009, 367 Posts, 3589 Comments
Comment posted by Crystal Kelehear on September 9, 2010 at 12:37 AM
Thanks for your helpful comments everyone :smile:

Unfortunately this photo is full frame, Richard's predictions on the conditions being very mucky were correct! I actually held the camera down at ground level and pointed in the general direction of the toads... some of my frames were toadless altogether! My old camera (Panasonic Lumix FZ30) had the option of a rotatable viewfinder for such low shots, I miss that option dearly. Does anyone have a technique for taking low angle photos without have to lie in the muck with the toads?
Registered on April 23, 2008, 9 Posts, 9 Comments
Comment posted by Ákos Lumnitzer on September 9, 2010 at 4:15 AM
Some of the DSLRs I think now have a pull-out, rotating screen like the little point and squirt cameras do. You can also buy an angle finder for many DSLR cameras. But getting low and filthy after rolling in mud photographing at eye level is half the fun.

:biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin:
Registered on April 24, 2004, 25 Posts, 510 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on September 9, 2010 at 8:16 PM
Interesting close up perspective. I quite like the feeling of the crowded frame. It took a moment for my brain to register the presence and significance of the female! Yes, getting down to their level can be much of the fun!
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments