Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Killdeer
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Killdeer

by Richard Ditch

Gallery: AvianPosted September 9, 2010117 views14 comments
Killdeer (Charadrius vociferus)

Place: Gilbert Water Ranch, AZ
Date: May 20, 2006 @ 8:01 am
Equipment: Nikon D200, Nikkor AF-S 300/2.8, TC20E (2x), G1325, RRS BH-55, Sidekick
Exposure: ISO 200, Aperture priority matrix metered, 1/180th @ f/11, -1/3rd ec
Raw, PS C32 on Mac G4, moderate crop

Here's another shot that's been moldering in a folder on my hard drive. I sat in the open on the bank of this wet area watching a family with a couple young birds that at times came rather close.

For some reason I find it very difficult to record/reproduce the look of the feathers on these juvie birds – there's little difference between feather definition and over sharpening IMO.

My other primary issue with this shot is the boring light.It was already 8:00 am, and the AZ sun is quite high and harsh that long after sunrise. Direct front light has limited the appearance of shadows but has also made the image a bit flat and boring.

In processing I used the healing brush to eliminate some specular highlights on the vegetation in the background, and toned down a couple of the brigtest leaves.

Honest critiques requested; all comments (positive or negative) appreciated.

Comments

14 comments
Comment posted by Axel Hildebrandt on September 9, 2010 at 2:51 PM
Nice find and light. The chick blends in nicely.
Registered on October 16, 2006, 66 Posts, 441 Comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on September 9, 2010 at 4:33 PM
I like the way the chick is framed by the vegetation. Other than that, I agree with your self critique.
Could the appearance of oversharpening be the effect of too many hard edges too close together? I've noticed the same thing on fine stems, antennae, hair on insect legs, etc. :confused:
Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by Ákos Lumnitzer on September 9, 2010 at 6:23 PM
Love this little guy! Has immense cute factor. While I think a lower angle is always better, I doubt this instance you could have gotten lower because of the vegetation. I think the light is fine as is sharpness. Overall a fabulous image.

:toast:
Registered on April 24, 2004, 25 Posts, 510 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Bielefeld on September 9, 2010 at 7:23 PM
Your being pretty harsh on yourself here Rich. I love this image. The young killdeer is awesome in that habitat. I know what you mean about sharpening the feathers on young downy birds. It can be difficult to get something that looks sharp even though it is. Well done here.
Registered on December 6, 2008, 360 Posts, 7132 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on September 9, 2010 at 9:13 PM
I just can't be as critical as you are about this image, Rich. I think he's cute, not boring. Sharpening looks fine to me. The vegetation is a bit more brightly lit than I'd prefer....but that's easily remedied in post-processing if you want to. I'm glad you posted it. :toast:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on September 9, 2010 at 9:41 PM
The feathers and lighting look fine to me Richard. If a lower angle was possible I think that would have improved this. :toast:
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments
Comment posted by David Haynes on September 9, 2010 at 10:26 PM
Beautiful environment shot Rich. Love the colors. Whites look spot on. Very sharp and a good head angle. Perfect comp of a cute little guy. Love the ragetty little tail feathers. I might clone out that one leaf in the lower right corner that sticks up like a thumb. Superb image Rich.
Registered on February 20, 2010, 110 Posts, 1511 Comments
Comment posted by Brian Gatlin on September 10, 2010 at 7:47 PM
I like it, Rich. The bird is nicely framed by the vegetation, and the light is fine with me. I might try a little more sharpening just on the head.
Registered on March 21, 2009, 202 Posts, 4187 Comments
Comment posted by Rob Drummond on September 11, 2010 at 2:03 AM
Really like the setting and detail Richard. Would have liked a slightly lower perspective but I know that's not always possible.

cheers
Rob
Registered on November 8, 2003, 617 Posts, 8267 Comments
Comment posted by Mia McPherson on September 11, 2010 at 1:58 PM
Rich

I believe you are too hard on yourself about the feather texture of this chick, it looks fine to me, not oversharpened at all imo, it appears to be quite downy yet. I love the habitat, it provides a sense of place without being distracting to me. I know I prefer this setting over the typical BOAS type. Great how you got a catchlight in the eye too, that can be especially difficult to do with shorebird chicks. Love the pose, comp, sharpness and details.
Registered on June 25, 2007, 491 Posts, 12566 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Dudley on September 11, 2010 at 7:49 PM
Well, it's pretty much unanimous Rich. I think you've been too harsh in your judgement of this shot too. Perhaps you could have had more feather definition in the frontal whites earlier in the day but I don't think you'd have gained much. IMO, there's just something about precocial chicks (avocets come to mind) that makes them difficult, even impossible, to get the same detail as adults. I think this is an excellent image.
Registered on March 30, 2007, 437 Posts, 10915 Comments
Comment posted by Angela McCain on September 11, 2010 at 10:28 PM
I love this little guy and your capture is well done. I tried to find some Killdeer Chicks this season and could just never locate them despite the signals by the parents that they were nearby.
Registered on April 19, 2009, 367 Posts, 3589 Comments
Comment posted by May Haga on September 13, 2010 at 1:34 PM
Great shot Richard. Really enjoy the habitat.
May
Registered on February 22, 2007, 714 Posts, 8470 Comments
Comment posted by Howard Cheek on January 29, 2011 at 7:36 PM
I think the light might be better as you say, but the image quality and young subject carry the day here. And the sharpness appears fine, they're supposed to cute, soft, and fuzzy man ;)
I've tried shooting this bird only once, and it was from the across the river I was parked at. I would be proud to call this mine.
Registered on July 24, 2008, 1201 Posts, 10758 Comments