Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Burrowing Owl
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Burrowing Owl

by Ron Dudley

Gallery: AvianPosted October 10, 2010236 views22 comments
I always enjoy catching one of these owls on an elevated perch as it doesn't happen very often for me. Background is the Great Salt Lake - the brown horizontal band is an OOF rocky island.

I can't figure out why there doesn't seem to be quite as much fine detail in some areas of the wing, esp at f/16. I checked and my POF was on the beak and left eye. At first I thought a wing twitch might have caused motion blur at this SS but all my other images of this bird show the same thing, including some shot at f/8 and 1/1600. Mia also has many images of this owl that show the same apparent lack of fine detail in the wing. My best guess is that it's due to the well known "softness" of owl wing feathers for silent flight. Any other ideas?

7D, 1/320, f/16, ISO 400, 500 f/4, 1.4 tc, shot from pickup window on 8/23/10, cropped to 48% of original image, lightened the shadows very slightly in ACR, sharpened bird with a bit of extra sharpening on the wing, no additional processing or adjustments, natural light, not baited

Comments/critique appreciated

Comments

22 comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on October 10, 2010 at 6:27 PM
Nice image. I'm glad you posted and asked the whole group about the sharpness as I've been wondering since first seeing this.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments
Comment posted by Angela McCain on October 10, 2010 at 6:52 PM
Amazing image of this bird. Lovely light. Great eyes.
Registered on April 19, 2009, 367 Posts, 3589 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hackley on October 10, 2010 at 8:58 PM
Excellent shot. What is interesting to me is that one eye pupil is larger than the other one. I like the detail, comp and look the owl is giving. I have noticed the same feather softness in photographing Gambel's Quail.
Registered on September 17, 2009, 302 Posts, 5535 Comments
Comment posted by KC Choo on October 10, 2010 at 10:30 PM
Great to get this Owl perched like this! Love it! I don't have any suggestions regarding the softness, other than slight motion blur at 1/320, but then.........
Registered on November 15, 2004, 519 Posts, 8278 Comments
Comment posted by Simon Bennett on October 10, 2010 at 10:32 PM
Terrific pose and clarity around the eye. Nice setting and background too.
Registered on February 4, 2007, 350 Posts, 4614 Comments
Comment posted by Jim DeWitt on October 10, 2010 at 10:45 PM
The softness is very slight, Ron. I might not have seen it if you hadn't mentioned it. My guess is that it is respiration. The softest bits seem to be where the motion from breathing would be greatest.

Nor does it seriously detract from an excellent photo.

By the way, for those who haven't been around owls much, the different pupil sizes is normal; the bird's can independently control each pupil.
Registered on August 28, 2006, 1240 Posts, 8506 Comments
Comment posted by Michael Lotito on October 11, 2010 at 4:18 AM
Great owl shot Ron! :toast:
Registered on June 26, 2009, 181 Posts, 1558 Comments
Comment posted by Rob Drummond on October 11, 2010 at 6:09 AM
I think you've hit the nail on the head Ron - some feathers just refuse to show fine detail. We have a couple of cuckoos where it's almost impossible to get feather definition around the head. But having said that I think the detail on the wing is fine. Lovely light and setting.

cheers
Rob
Registered on November 8, 2003, 617 Posts, 8267 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Ross on October 11, 2010 at 7:20 AM
Nice one Ron, like the soft warm lighting, it may be that there is little tonal variation in the feather parts and there is no shadow being cast to provide any variation.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 403 Posts, 2729 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Bielefeld on October 11, 2010 at 7:51 AM
Sweet shot Ron. Love the comp with the nice habitat. BG is great too. Nice sharpness on the bird. Can't help you with the wing blurr, your explaination seems reasonable.
Registered on December 6, 2008, 360 Posts, 7132 Comments
Comment posted by Keith Bauer on October 11, 2010 at 9:02 AM
I really like the pose and perch for this image. Of course the background just sends it over the top. Interesting about the softness. Doesn't bother me. Great image. I'll check back to read what others have to say about the reasons for the softness.
Registered on November 20, 2003, 458 Posts, 4836 Comments
Comment posted by Ronnie Gaubert on October 11, 2010 at 9:14 AM
Hi Ron,
It looks good here but I'm not looking at the original. For some reason I have the same problem with perched hummingbirds. After awhile I just stopped worrying about. The background is wonderful here with good details in the bird. Very nice image with good direction lighting.
Ronnie
Registered on November 1, 2003, 810 Posts, 3495 Comments
Comment posted by Monica Siri on October 11, 2010 at 9:42 AM
Ron,
beautiful image with great pose, perch and background. :toast:
Registered on September 20, 2009, 132 Posts, 3764 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on October 11, 2010 at 2:25 PM
Excellent, Ron. I really like the depth in the right eye. :toast:
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by Charles Gangas on October 11, 2010 at 4:17 PM
Ron, I like the pose and the way the branches of the perch frame the owl on both sides. The brown blur across the blue BG adds an interesting affect, which I find appealing. In spite of the nits you mentioned this is another stunning image. :toast:
Registered on August 12, 2009, 544 Posts, 2414 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on October 11, 2010 at 6:42 PM
Handsome image as posted, Ron. Regarding your question about detail in some areas of the wing: Normally I would think motion blur. However, you mention seeing the same characteristic at 1/1600 s. So, maybe we are just looking at a lack of contrast in smooth, fine structured feather areas. I tried testing that idea by loading your image into the "tonal contrast" plug-in (part of the Nik Color Efex software) and pushing the adjustments to maximum in order to draw out any contrast variation. I can certainly see much more detail. However, it wrecks the appearance of the image. Therefore, I think at this "scale of scrutiny" that you have just the right amount of contrast and feather detail. It is possible to increase it with processing to show much more detail but I don't think that the bird would look right even if you are careful to concentrate only on the smooth areas. I believe that we should just accept the difference in detail that is visible as being a natural view of this bird and appreciate this beautiful image. My only nit is that I'd like a better view of the feet (I think I'm developing a foot fetish as a result of my NPN activity.) :toast:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by Eric Diller on October 11, 2010 at 7:03 PM
Looks like he was already for the photo shoot! Awesome work!
Registered on October 2, 2009, 69 Posts, 434 Comments
Comment posted by Doug Gilham on October 11, 2010 at 7:33 PM
Really nice image Ron. I love seeing these owls perched up like this. I did not know about the different pupil sizes, and is clearly visible here. It would have been nice to get it without the shadow on the wing & foot, but we take what we are given. I find this an extremely pleasing image with the BG and lighting.
As for your question, I think you summed it up when you said "due to the well known "softness" of owl wing feathers for silent flight". I do think that the angle, light, and of course subject all play into the softness as well. Great Capture :toast:
Registered on September 20, 2009, 77 Posts, 489 Comments
Comment posted by Mia McPherson on October 11, 2010 at 8:23 PM
Ron,

We had great fun with this bird and the blues of the Great Salt Lake in the background are gorgeous. I tend to think the softness in the wing of the bird is due to the softnes of the owls feathers, if it were movement it wouldn't be in all of our images of this one owl. I know it wasn't your gear because my images had the same result.

Love the pose, the light in the owl's eyes and the sagebrush the owl is perched on.
Registered on June 25, 2007, 491 Posts, 12566 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on October 11, 2010 at 11:58 PM
Sweet shot Ron, I've noticed this softness in Burrowing Owl flight shots and always thought it was either motion blur or inadequate depth of field, now I'll have a different take on it . :toast:
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments
Comment posted by Darren Colello on October 12, 2010 at 12:49 PM
This is stunning Ron. I would love to view this species. Excellent textures and overall comp. :toast:
Registered on July 27, 2009, 175 Posts, 1100 Comments
Comment posted by Pete Bengeyfield on October 13, 2010 at 10:38 AM
Getting one on sage was a good find. The only elevated perches I get are fenceposts. Nice shot.
Registered on December 2, 2003, 1247 Posts, 3439 Comments