Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Grand Dawn
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Grand Dawn

by Chris Moore

Gallery: LandscapePosted November 22, 2010795 views33 comments
From recent posts it looks like several photographers were able to take advantage of the spectacular sunrise light in Zion a couple of weeks ago. I took this at the Patriarchs, 5DII, 16-35mm, f/11 manual blend of two exposures- 2 seconds for the sky and 10 seconds for the foreground, both at ISO 320. Cropped about 75% or the original, cloned out a small visible portion of the bridge. Would be interested in any comments/critique regarding the processing. Thanks so much.

Comments

33 comments
Comment posted by Ben Horne on November 22, 2010 at 1:21 PM
That was indeed a beautiful sunrise. Im glad that you were able to capture it with such epic cliffs in the background. I do wish that the foreground was a bit more simplified, but that is difficult to find in that area. The exposure looks very natural to me -- good job with the blend. I wasn't setup to shoot that sunrise, but I did capture some video of it.
Registered on August 27, 2009, 51 Posts, 959 Comments
Comment posted by Mitch Moraski on November 22, 2010 at 1:29 PM
Stellar shot Chris!! Great processing all around. Love the 10 second flow. Great job!! :toast:
Registered on August 3, 2008, 105 Posts, 590 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Colvin on November 22, 2010 at 2:01 PM
Very nice blending job. Really like the longer exposure for the water.
Registered on December 2, 2009, 15 Posts, 93 Comments
Comment posted by Stuart Williams on November 22, 2010 at 2:04 PM
glorious light. i would have preferred a shorter (+/- 1s) for the FG (dial that ISO dial!) as i'm not always too fond (in these circumstances) of that glassy water look.
Registered on December 7, 2007, 247 Posts, 4792 Comments
Comment posted by Andreas Resch on November 22, 2010 at 2:48 PM
Looks great, Chris. Nice heavy tones and bumped up colors. If I had to be picky I would try to get some of the magenta out of the water - but only a little.
Registered on November 14, 2007, 322 Posts, 6101 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Sieren on November 22, 2010 at 4:06 PM
What a glorious scene Chris!
Registered on January 2, 2008, 360 Posts, 5321 Comments
Comment posted by Joel Hazelton on November 22, 2010 at 4:36 PM
Epic :toast:
Registered on August 6, 2008, 194 Posts, 1315 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Chambers on November 22, 2010 at 4:49 PM
Beautiful shot Chris. There does seem to be a slight magenta cast in the water, but I'm on my work monitor now so I don't know how accurate that is.
Registered on April 10, 2005, 753 Posts, 21216 Comments
Comment posted by Scott Bycroft on November 22, 2010 at 4:59 PM
Really crisp and impressive image. Quite magnificent.
Registered on September 24, 2008, 14 Posts, 13 Comments
Comment posted by Geoffrey Baker on November 22, 2010 at 5:49 PM
An outstanding image, the milky water looks great :smile:
Well done.

Geoff.
Registered on August 20, 2010, 192 Posts, 980 Comments
Comment posted by Larry Fischer on November 22, 2010 at 6:06 PM
On my monitor the mountains seem to be internally glowing. The water, for my taste, is overdone but long exposures necessary for your technique cannot overcome that--if it needs to overcome??
In my mind this is a surreal photo approaching photo art. I guess one had to be there for the unusual condition because this is a unique effort.
the fisch
Registered on July 28, 2008, 155 Posts, 874 Comments
Comment posted by Kyle L. Krause on November 22, 2010 at 6:14 PM
Wow this is beauitful, great job on your proessing. The details are nice. Nicely done Chris. :toast:
Registered on June 15, 2010, 29 Posts, 605 Comments
Comment posted by Ian Haskell on November 22, 2010 at 6:24 PM
Surreal and powerful...glowtastic.

Ian
Registered on October 30, 2008, 24 Posts, 673 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Moore on November 22, 2010 at 9:24 PM
Thanks for the comments. The AWB in camera gave the whole photo a very deep magenta cast so I had to correct that, but looks like some does still remain in the water. I usually do like 1-2 second exposures for water but kept thinking if I pushed the ISO too high I would lose detail for noise in the foliage that I was trying to preserve. The scene was very surreal, and in my mind it was even more colorful and majestic than I see when I look at the photo.
Registered on January 12, 2010, 84 Posts, 388 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on November 22, 2010 at 10:09 PM
Wow. Tremendous image.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Nicolaus Wegner on November 22, 2010 at 10:25 PM
Was there anyone who didn't photograph this sunrise in Zion? Hahha...wow...just saying.

Great photograph Chris. Another cool take on a pretty amazing...and popular moment at that park.
Registered on February 21, 2010, 133 Posts, 1509 Comments
Comment posted by Bruce King on November 23, 2010 at 12:35 AM
Fan-freakin-tastic! The glow on the horizon is spectacular. Way to work the moment. :toast:
Registered on January 14, 2010, 276 Posts, 2212 Comments
Comment posted by Jimmy Gekas on November 23, 2010 at 1:10 AM
Sweet! :toast:
Registered on July 26, 2007, 244 Posts, 2807 Comments
Comment posted by Christer Johansson on November 23, 2010 at 2:41 AM
Just lovely Chris. Tremendous soft and warm light in an excellent composition. Maybe a little bit to crisp in the background trees. :toast:
Registered on October 10, 2009, 50 Posts, 191 Comments
Comment posted by Naret Visesvongsa on November 23, 2010 at 3:56 AM
Your post process work is very good and I also like this composition.
Registered on November 10, 2010, 6 Posts, 73 Comments
Comment posted by Robert Dayton on November 23, 2010 at 9:55 AM
Great composition and the colors are breathtaking, Chris! Zion is one of
my favorite places to photograph and you've captured it well. Also good
shutter speed on the water.
Registered on November 11, 2008, 281 Posts, 3958 Comments
Comment posted by mark cillo on November 23, 2010 at 12:51 PM
Beautiful scene and well captured IMO :wavey:
Registered on July 27, 2008, 143 Posts, 1483 Comments
Comment posted by David Edwards on November 23, 2010 at 2:13 PM
Great image Chris. The blend looks good to me, and the color and contrast is very rich. Very nice comp and I like the blurred water.
Registered on December 6, 2008, 142 Posts, 2623 Comments
Comment posted by Max Waugh on November 23, 2010 at 2:31 PM
Glorious scene, and I love the color in the mountains and sky. The water and rocks do have a bit of an unrealistic sheen IMO. I love the texture of the water, but overall the bottom half of the image does have that "HDR look" to it... which isn't a negative at all if you're don't mind a touch of surrealism (as someone else put it).

Max
Registered on September 26, 2008, 428 Posts, 2329 Comments
Comment posted by dean hebert on November 23, 2010 at 3:00 PM
Spectacular!I don't mind the colour cast of the water(as long as I don't have to drink it :wink: )but I'm not a fan of the long exposure.I might have opened the apeture a bit as well as upped the ISO then tried a 2 shot blend for depth-of-field as well as exposure. Beautiful as is. :toast:
Registered on August 4, 2010, 70 Posts, 1132 Comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on November 23, 2010 at 8:32 PM
Pretty much a glorious image. Fantastic light and color. :toast:
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments
Comment posted by Barry Vangrov on November 23, 2010 at 9:25 PM
I'm on the side of preferring a shorter shutter speed on the water but it does add to the almost surreal light going on. And, oh my, that glow on the Patriarchs is just fantastic.
Registered on September 1, 2009, 148 Posts, 749 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Chamberlain on November 23, 2010 at 9:35 PM
Gorgeous! Amazing light and exposure showing all the detail throughout. This really reminds me of Marc Adamus' work!

Chris
Registered on March 13, 2007, 500 Posts, 8365 Comments
Comment posted by Adam Gibbs on November 24, 2010 at 12:02 AM
Lovely scene Chris. The light is certainly a great bonus.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 168 Posts, 870 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on November 24, 2010 at 10:40 AM
I saw this image in Chris's camera and witnessed it in person. There's nothing Photoshopped about that glow on the peaks (reflected light from the most explosive sunrise you can imagine) or water. I do recall the sky being a bit darker compared with the cloud hightlights and the highlights being a little more red/magenta, like in Joe's processing, but that's the only minor difference. People who think these colors are a result of too much PP should have been there! One other minor point, I think the bottom could be cropped a tad more.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Michael Anderson on November 26, 2010 at 4:19 AM
Gorgeous Chris!
Registered on January 31, 2006, 228 Posts, 3072 Comments
Comment posted by Justin Reznick on November 30, 2010 at 1:12 PM
I'm late to the party Chris! It was great witnessing this scene with you! I think you did a great job putting this together. It was incredibly dark during this show and there was no easy way to "freeze" the water. Once I get to processing mine, our water will be identical. I would normally photograph the water when there was more light in the sky, but in this case the magenta cast over the landscape was so incredible I feel like it's best to use the exposure from the dramatic light. In fact, while your image looks completely natural, I think the scene had more of a magenta cast over it! The trees look fantastic, as do the peaks and clouds. I do wish the stinkin' log jam wasn't in the lower right corner, but you already knew that!
Registered on November 24, 2009, 79 Posts, 515 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Moore on November 30, 2010 at 1:23 PM
Thanks, Justin, I'm curious to see your version as they were taken simultaneously. In reviewing the RAW files, as well as how I have the scene pictured in my mind, I do agree that there was more magenta both in the sky and foreground. I think I overcompensated for that with redoing the white balance. So I reprocessed it with that in mind and also with Marc's advice to crop more off the bottom. I also used a different image of the background in the blend that has better light on the peak. It definitely looks more surreal, and has a distinct magenta cast throughout, and I even had to take the saturation down a little bit. This version is not web sharpened, so thats why it looks a little soft. I really appreciate all the feedback.
Registered on January 12, 2010, 84 Posts, 388 Comments