Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
The Hermitage
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

The Hermitage

by Marc Adamus

Gallery: LandscapePosted December 7, 20102,189 views67 comments
I met up with Floris out at this remote location in the Utah desert to photograph before meeting up with Guy Tal and Jay Goodrich later in the week. We had a campsite to ourselves and were greeted by a spectacular sunrise the following morning.

We had both been here before but only I had photographed it - in 2005, when I found that relying on six stops of grad filters stacked together in order to bring out some of the details in these fascinatingly lonely trees at sunrise didn't work so well. Five years later, I used two exposures blended selectively to make the image work and clearly both of us owe some artistic inspiration to Guy, who's image from near here is unforgettable.

Tech: Canon 5D Mark II, Nikon 14-24 with V3 adapter at 14mm. No enhancement of colors at all.

Additionally, I have been experimenting lately with some different types of interpretations, one of which I just posted in the Photo Art gallery.


Marc

Comments

67 comments
Comment posted by Raymond D Smith on December 7, 2010 at 12:00 PM
Marc I feel totally unqualified to critique your photo but here goes. The light on the foreground is awesome, its delicate and not over bearing. The tree I think is over dodged but I understand why. I would like to see the surrounding area maybe a touch darker. Overall another great photo where the sky complaints the the ground something I try to do also. Cheers
Registered on January 22, 2009, 12 Posts, 479 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on December 7, 2010 at 12:03 PM
Probably the thing I struggled with most in the processing here Ray, because there was no right answer. I knew no matter what I did with the tree, some would find it too dark and others too bright. The tree is very light in color and the stone down there is quite dark. When I look at the bottom half of the image only, the light levels look pretty natural to my eye.

I appreciate your comment!
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on December 7, 2010 at 12:05 PM
Just in case you prefer it darker.....
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Kevin Trinkner on December 7, 2010 at 12:05 PM
Beautiful scene Marc, the colors, lines, and subject material are wonderful. Awesome you guys were rewarded with such an incredible sunrise on your return shoot. Great work. :toast:
Registered on June 30, 2008, 203 Posts, 2641 Comments
Comment posted by Raymond D Smith on December 7, 2010 at 12:05 PM
Registered on January 22, 2009, 12 Posts, 479 Comments
Comment posted by Darren Colello on December 7, 2010 at 12:07 PM
Gorgeous lighting and a most unique composition. Stellar Marc in every regard. Thanks for sharing this beauty. :toast:
Registered on July 27, 2009, 175 Posts, 1100 Comments
Comment posted by Raymond D Smith on December 7, 2010 at 12:11 PM
Marc, It seems like I like my photo's a little on the darker side. Some of my favorite photos of yours are the ones that are darker. I find my eyes try harder to find the details and I spend a longer time looking at the photo's. Hope that all makes sense. Another reason why I might be having trouble with the hole and tree is the brightest spot is just over top of it.Cheers
Registered on January 22, 2009, 12 Posts, 479 Comments
Comment posted by Gary McGhee on December 7, 2010 at 12:23 PM
Great job in photographing this Marc, the two cracks in the foreground sandstone channel my eye straight to the tree. Gorgeous sky.

Gary.
Registered on April 15, 2010, 142 Posts, 2416 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on December 7, 2010 at 12:34 PM
Version 1 (slight dodge on the tree) looks just about perfect to me on my monitor.:toast: Even calibrated monitors vary, so its hard to really get too picky about the minutia. IMO the main subject matter should be drawn out a tad, as the brain and eye adjusts to situations like this (when seeing them in person) and make you see things more clearly when looking at them directly.

Also love its strong red color theme.

Can't wait to get my chance at this spot soon. I'm hoping for two double rainbows in the background! :biggrin:
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Moore on December 7, 2010 at 12:36 PM
Very nice, Marc. I prefer the darker version slightly. Cheers
Registered on January 12, 2010, 84 Posts, 388 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on December 7, 2010 at 12:42 PM
Mark, you'll definitely find that it's not just one spot. There's lots of holes like this around the area, several of which have trees and other foliage. Unique compositions can be found all around, which is nice.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Floris van Breugel on December 7, 2010 at 12:52 PM
The foreground works really well here - the 14 must help a lot with that as at 16mm the evening before I just couldn't get those lines to do quite that. Got my adaptor yesterday, woo! You did a great job at controlling the insane colors on the slickrock too, it looks perfect. Of course, as I mentioned on the rocks, the fiery sky goes against the peace and quiet the trees exude, making the image less effective overall from an emotional standpoint IMO. But.. many people will love it :smile:

Your motion blur looks great too - don't see them with lighting that nicely very much. Might be a cliche concept, but the lighting makes it stand out for me.
Registered on December 19, 2008, 306 Posts, 4840 Comments
Comment posted by Andreas Resch on December 7, 2010 at 12:54 PM
Sublime rendition of an otherworldly place.
Registered on November 14, 2007, 322 Posts, 6101 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on December 7, 2010 at 1:02 PM
I dunno, Floris. In both Guy's and your rendition, the sky was as dramatic as possible, although not firey. I think it's that contrast between the 'sheltered' tree and the intense surroundings that gives it exactly the emotional content I was after.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Joseph Rossbach on December 7, 2010 at 1:03 PM
Loving this Marc and your image in PA is right up my alley as well. Fantastic work man!! :toast:
Registered on November 25, 2005, 484 Posts, 1377 Comments
Comment posted by Dietrich Gloger on December 7, 2010 at 1:10 PM
I remember Guys image well, such a unique and characteristic place. The overall red tone in this image works really well. I also like the fg lines and the curves you used to get the viewer into the scene. Interesting to see the darker version. I think I prefer the darker version actually - Raymond has a point with the "dodged" look of the tree. Anyway, the image is quite amazing Marc.
Registered on January 26, 2007, 360 Posts, 9876 Comments
Comment posted by dean hebert on December 7, 2010 at 1:14 PM
The "realism" of a photo like this is of no concern. Heck,I'd like to see that tree glowing from within! :biggrin: Nicely done Marc. :toast:
Registered on August 4, 2010, 70 Posts, 1132 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Maile on December 7, 2010 at 1:18 PM
Version B for me Marc, beautiful shot and spot.
Registered on March 2, 2009, 984 Posts, 2518 Comments
Comment posted by Gino Cortez on December 7, 2010 at 1:36 PM
Sky, blend, and foreground all look fabulous to me, Man, that 14mm sure opens up some foreground real estate!
Registered on November 23, 2010, 57 Posts, 396 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on December 7, 2010 at 1:36 PM
I think this rocks! Aside from subject matter or conditions, its a strong comp; just perfect how all the lines lead to the tree, including the fortuitous sun pillar in the sky. Exposure looks as good as you can get. Variety is great, but quality is more important--and this is quality (not-so-subtle dig to Floris :biggrin: :jump: )
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by Jimmy Gekas on December 7, 2010 at 1:47 PM
This rocks! I love the wide, wide, wide angle here. What I also love is the color in the water below. I prefer the darker version, too. :toast:
Registered on July 26, 2007, 244 Posts, 2807 Comments
Comment posted by Phil Pogledich on December 7, 2010 at 1:55 PM
This is a very powerful image that really conveys the essence of this location in the same way as Guy Tal's classic from a while back. The lighter version works better for me. I'd put this near the top of my favorites of yours.
Registered on August 24, 2009, 123 Posts, 3099 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Moore on December 7, 2010 at 2:02 PM
Very nice, Marc. I prefer the darker version slightly. Cheers
Registered on January 12, 2010, 84 Posts, 388 Comments
Comment posted by Robert Dayton on December 7, 2010 at 2:06 PM
Great colors, lighting, and well composed, Marc! It's simple
but elegant.
Registered on November 11, 2008, 281 Posts, 3958 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Baumbach on December 7, 2010 at 2:41 PM
This is a wonderful compliment to Guy's version. Beautiful.

- Dan.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 473 Posts, 7980 Comments
Comment posted by Anne K. Rusk on December 7, 2010 at 2:49 PM
This is a great sunrise and an excellent image, as usual! The lines leading in from the bottom take this over the top for me. The exposure looks very natural and what I would see if I were standing there. :cool:
Registered on October 10, 2010, 65 Posts, 904 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Diggins on December 7, 2010 at 3:01 PM
Great use of lines in the sandstone to help draw the eye in. Amazing !!!!!
Registered on May 8, 2010, 4 Posts, 83 Comments
Comment posted by Arild Heitmann on December 7, 2010 at 3:05 PM
nothing to say really....the whole scene is on fire. I know within the first second i look at an image if i like it or not...and i liked this one almost before i saw it :-)
Registered on October 13, 2010, 27 Posts, 378 Comments
Comment posted by Sean Bagshaw on December 7, 2010 at 3:32 PM
Near perfection Marc. Power, grace, simplicity. My only visual distraction, and a very minor point, is the really bright spot at the horizon but I don't have any suggestions. Can't stop the sun.
Registered on February 14, 2007, 99 Posts, 479 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on December 7, 2010 at 3:53 PM
Sean, thanks. Interesting to note. I have the information in my files to eliminate that, so it would be good to see if anyone else finds it distracting. I thought it helped draw the eye through the scene by adding some depth/luminosity that was missing without it.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on December 7, 2010 at 3:57 PM
Thanks Marc, I really meant the general area. The barren reddish rock is to die for even without the tree in the holes I think...

Question: why not just use the new Canon 14mm LII? I have been LOVING that lens BTW!
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments
Comment posted by Lori Kincaid on December 7, 2010 at 4:09 PM
Beautiful, Marc. The positioning of the lines in the rock relative to the tree is perfect. I prefer the lighter tree.

Lori
Registered on November 15, 2003, 90 Posts, 2033 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on December 7, 2010 at 4:11 PM
Mark, it's simple. I don't carry primes. In this day and age of lens technology, TSE's and ultra-big aperture telephotos aside, I don't have a reason to limit myself to a fixed focal length. The combination of what I do and what I carry is already enough. If I had the 14mm II, I'd still want the 14-24 or 16-35. I don't want to carry both.

BTW, I'm hearing good things about a filter system for the 14-24 now.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by James Fougère on December 7, 2010 at 4:41 PM
Marc, all I can say is; "I wish I was there"! What are the chances of a tree growing in that spot! The lines in the stone, the color, light etc are incredible! Another home run :cool:
Registered on October 25, 2010, 41 Posts, 831 Comments
Comment posted by Luis Argerich on December 7, 2010 at 5:02 PM
I love the camera angle, how it focus in the tree but giving a lot of detail about the surroundings. That is the cherry on a picture that as usual is excellent.

:toast:
Registered on December 22, 2009, 91 Posts, 1349 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on December 7, 2010 at 5:08 PM
James, thanks. And hurry up and post something already! :biggrin: Can't wait to see some of your work on here!
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Adam Gibbs on December 7, 2010 at 5:23 PM
Well done Marc another winner for sure.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 168 Posts, 870 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on December 7, 2010 at 5:49 PM
Marc,

I really like the balance stricken between the sky and lower section of the bowl; this allows the tree to remain a strong focal point - even despite the glory of the sky.

I prefer the second version, it seems closer to your typical processing and presentation. and the sliver of light on the horizon is to be expected, not a nit for me.

Pretty soon someone is going to have to rope this area off for protection.... the new Subway? :confused: :wink:

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Kory Lidstrom on December 7, 2010 at 5:52 PM
Wow, awesome. 'Nuff said.

One thing though: where the hell was that kind of cloud action when we where there?
Registered on November 19, 2008, 49 Posts, 1035 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on December 7, 2010 at 5:55 PM
Lon, I have never before in my several nights out here seen another person I didn't know. I hope it stays that way but it likely won't. The road (nearby), at least, is working to keep it that way right now though I can tell you.

Kory, I forgot to order the clouds and they showed up late. Sorry.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Justin Reznick on December 7, 2010 at 6:11 PM
Stunning image Marc! I love the colors in the rock and the strong circular motion. I echo Sean's note about the horizon.

Registered on November 24, 2009, 79 Posts, 515 Comments
Comment posted by Anthony Vincent on December 7, 2010 at 6:53 PM
Ya these are cool areas from the others I have seen. Its crazy that it only took 2 exposures but not being there its hard to interpret the light. I don't tackle scenes like this cause I need some work on my ps blending so I have a few ques. for ya.

Just beyond the tree the dark shadows are they clipped or extremely close? Also the bright sun area as well, clipped? I can see how everything else can fall into the DR though. I surprised you didn't opt for a sunstar but actually like this better as the main element here is the tree.

Nice work and amazing getting all that color out the sky. Makes me want to stick to intimates :smile:
Registered on February 5, 2009, 199 Posts, 2775 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Teller on December 7, 2010 at 6:56 PM
Unique image and great light. I have not nearly arrived at this level in photography yet.
Registered on August 23, 2010, 1162 Posts, 6692 Comments
Comment posted by John Mumaw on December 7, 2010 at 7:04 PM
This image is right up there with your best work from the Colorado Plateau. You really do this region justice in your work.
I prefer the lighter version as the tree appears to be a bit more 'haunted'.
The bright spot on the horizon does catch my eye every time I view this one. I feel that a slight burning of that one spot would lessen a distraction while still adhering to your vision.
Registered on September 9, 2005, 62 Posts, 2289 Comments
Comment posted by Paul DeCesare on December 7, 2010 at 7:19 PM
Marc, I like the dark rich imaging, it just hits a chord. I'm still amazed at the detail in and around the tree, it really speaks of the effort to get the image you were after. I'll be revisiting this one and staring for a while!

Hey, I'm getting a bit frustrated by the soft edges on my 16-35 (also shoot a 5D2). Is the Nikon 14-24 better, and are there any oddities using the adapter? I haven't researched it all yet, I'd just like better edges!
Registered on August 31, 2007, 29 Posts, 202 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on December 7, 2010 at 7:22 PM
Tony, there's plenty of detail to be had in those shadows mainly because they are all taken from a much brighter exposure and blended in, reducing potential noise issues. They are close to black in this rendition though. There is a tiny sliver of total white in the sky, but that's intentional. My feeling is that a sun star would have caused threefold the number of DR problems and probably distracted/overpowered the tree. Thanks for the comment.

Paul, I made an evaluation of the 14-24 in the Photo Gear Reviews forum here. I think the 14-24 will solve your problems.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Sarah Marino on December 7, 2010 at 7:23 PM
Hi Marc - This is my favorite of your recent images. Powerful and striking in so many ways. I prefer the first version with the lighter tree and agree with a few comments that the bright spot is a bit distracting. Really beautiful.
Registered on November 10, 2008, 23 Posts, 393 Comments
Comment posted by Koveh Tavakkol on December 7, 2010 at 7:57 PM
Comp, colors, everything looks great on this one Marc. I do agree on the bright spot on the horizon though, as it distracts slightly from the rest of the scene.
Registered on September 1, 2009, 41 Posts, 608 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel Ewert on December 7, 2010 at 10:03 PM
Marc, I have always loved Guy's famous image from here and I think I like this one equally as well. Both are spectacular in their own way. This appeals to me so much partly because my favorite thing in the world is to enjoy solitude in the beauty of nature. Bear with me for a second, but the lone tree out there, surrounded by beauty, sort of speaks to me in that way. I don't know if that makes sense, but those are my thoughts :smile:
Registered on June 2, 2009, 103 Posts, 1500 Comments
Comment posted by Scott Smorra on December 7, 2010 at 10:13 PM
This is amazing Marc. I prefer the first version with the lighter tree. I really like those lead in lines on the foreground rock. Every time I look at this one my eye gets pulled to that bright spot on the horizon. I'd be interested in seeing a version with the sky toned down in that area. I think this might bring the focus back to the tree.
Registered on November 2, 2009, 161 Posts, 2143 Comments
Comment posted by Zack Clothier on December 7, 2010 at 11:08 PM
Definitely prefer the second version, looks more natural. As far as the sliver of bright light on the horizon goes it doesn't bother me that much. Nice work as always Marc. Checked out your post in the PA gallery, love it. :toast:
Registered on January 28, 2010, 343 Posts, 2257 Comments
Comment posted by Tyson Fisher on December 7, 2010 at 11:27 PM
Another sweet shot, Marc. Love the lead in lines and the incredible colors in the sky. The patch of blue sky on the right side is looking a little funky to me on my monitor. I don't know if it's from the conversion, blending.... Aside from that little detail this is an awesome shot!
Registered on September 17, 2008, 44 Posts, 623 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on December 7, 2010 at 11:42 PM
Neat all around. The 14 mm makes for a wild comp.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on December 7, 2010 at 11:58 PM
Tyson, the blue is just strait out of the RAW file. I could warm/brighten it up maybe? I think it looks a little flat and cool personally.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Paul DeCesare on December 8, 2010 at 12:06 AM
Thanks Marc. Read your review and visited the 16-9.net site. They need a little administration, says the V3's won't ship until July 2010, lol! But I saw the side-by-side image samples, WOW, that 14-24mm is the way to go. Sorry, don't mean to distract the thread with gear talk, but I appreciate the info.
Registered on August 31, 2007, 29 Posts, 202 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on December 8, 2010 at 12:12 AM
No problem, Paul. I forgot to mention, they just got listed on B&H as well. Novoflex is the company making these for 16.9 now, and apparently B&H got a stock of them too. I'd probably trust the B&H route to avoid shipping delays, of which there has been many.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Anish Desai on December 8, 2010 at 12:15 AM
I'll echo what most have said - this is an absolutely gorgeous image. The composition is perfect with the clouds complemeting the landscape extremely well. I do have a couple of minor nits, though.
First, and this is very minor, I don't mind a bit of pure white around the sun as that looks quite natural, but I find the blown out area in this particular rendition a little too large, and thus slightly distracting. If you have the information, I'd love to see this with a little more color filling in around a much smaller "white" area.
Secondly - and this is more bothersome for me personally - the sandstone slopes right at the horizon, especially around the sun, look a bit brighter than they should. Considering the terrain is sloping away from the sun (although rather slightly), I would expect those areas to be a bit darker and also reflecting a little less red. IMO, a little burning of those areas would make this look more natural. In contrast, the immediate FG slope facing the sun looks perfect.
I should add that I can't see what's above you, so there may be additional light reflection going on that I can't deduce from the image.
Registered on May 23, 2009, 49 Posts, 410 Comments
Comment posted by Miles Morgan on December 8, 2010 at 12:28 AM
Man, my eyes must just be off from most, because I much prefer the lighter tree version. It makes it pop more to my eye, and since its what is so unique about this location, that makes sense to my pea brain.

I don't think I've ever critiqued an image of yours in my life, because I figure that everything you've done you have done for a reason, so it would all be personal preference anyway. I read below and saw a few people mention the bright section of the sunrise. I'd love to see this processed with that darkened down more in line with the rest of the horizon for comparison. I think it would allow more attention to fall to the fact that the clouds overhead mimic the sandstone hole.. which is just unbelievably cool. Those lines in the FG rock are EVERYTHING in my opinion. Perfectly placed.

Just saw that you can get the 14-24 for around $1400 :eek: Of course... you have to buy a camera to go with it in order to get the rebate.
Registered on November 23, 2009, 6 Posts, 185 Comments
Comment posted by Paul DeCesare on December 8, 2010 at 12:44 AM
You're right, B&H and Adorama both stock them now, that's the way to go. Bye bye cruddy edges finally... thanks again.
Registered on August 31, 2007, 29 Posts, 202 Comments
Comment posted by Ben Horne on December 8, 2010 at 1:27 AM
This is a truly difficult scene to shoot, and you've done a great job keeping it very natural looking. The glow off the foreground sandstone really makes this special, and I like the careful placement of the fracture that radiates from the lower right corner. Perhaps the most compelling part of this image is the feeling that we are on the verge of seeing the sun peer over the distant horizon. I feel that if I stare at thie photo long enough, a glimmer of a sun star will appear.
Registered on August 27, 2009, 51 Posts, 959 Comments
Comment posted by Abdullaziz Bin Ali on December 8, 2010 at 5:51 AM
Oh My GOD
:eek:
Registered on May 31, 2009, 112 Posts, 1590 Comments
Comment posted by John Mumaw on December 8, 2010 at 6:46 AM
Congratulations on scoring the 'Earth Shot of the Day' with your aurora image.
Can you please point the way to your lens review? Thanks!

Registered on September 9, 2005, 62 Posts, 2289 Comments
Comment posted by Tyson Fisher on December 8, 2010 at 11:16 AM
Marc - In regards to the blue sky, it seems a little darker and less contrasty than it should be, especially around the edges. Warming it up might help as well. Again, awesome work here!
Registered on September 17, 2008, 44 Posts, 623 Comments
Comment posted by Paul DeCesare on December 8, 2010 at 1:19 PM
John, Marc's review is here, and Richard Peters did one last week also, right here.
Registered on August 31, 2007, 29 Posts, 202 Comments
Comment posted by Jason Miles Kirk on December 8, 2010 at 3:06 PM
What can I say that hasn't already been said. Wonderful stuff! Looking forward to more!
Registered on January 9, 2007, 7 Posts, 55 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Chamberlain on December 9, 2010 at 7:10 PM
Yeah!!!!

Chris
Registered on March 13, 2007, 500 Posts, 8365 Comments
Comment posted by Ruben Vicente on April 10, 2011 at 2:33 PM
Beautiful light and flawless composition. Very eye catching.
Registered on April 9, 2011, 4 Posts, 59 Comments