Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Harp & Bow
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Harp & Bow

by Bill Maile

Gallery: LandscapePosted December 8, 201076 views8 comments
Or Bow Harp I guess. This is one of those little scenes we sometimes spot, as we make our way in trying to capture the "bigger" picture. In this case, a beautiful river was the objective. But as my shooting buddy pulled over to park, these mossy greens and flowing water, along with ice on the branch, made me stop and put up the tripod.

D-60, ISO-100, SS 5 seconds, f-22.0, 55mm and CPL. Please view larger, and thanks for any C&C.

Comments

8 comments
Comment posted by Darren Huski on December 8, 2010 at 9:41 AM
A little busy. Does not really draw your eye anywhere.
Registered on August 17, 2008, 61 Posts, 340 Comments
Comment posted by John Mumaw on December 8, 2010 at 10:01 AM

I agree with Darren.
I think that your postprocessing techniques (e.g. Shadow/Highlight filter?) need some improvements. Much of your work appears to lack contrast.
Registered on September 9, 2005, 62 Posts, 2289 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Maile on December 8, 2010 at 10:31 AM
I really like the concept personally, but appreciate your opin Darren. Thanks!

As far as the processing goes, there is no doubt there is room for improvement on my end overall. But if you could view this photo on this monitor, and obviously you can't, it is precisely crisp, even in the NPN version. I kid you not. (No, not a calibrated monitor.) So let me try to "overprocess" (according to how it looks here) and repost. Again, I don't mind critique at all, just trying to explain what I'm seeing. Thanks folks!! :toast:
Registered on March 2, 2009, 984 Posts, 2518 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Maile on December 8, 2010 at 10:49 AM
OK, here is a touch up in Elements. Again, it's just hard to look at something on your (well, my) monitor and say, "ok, that will do", when most of what I'm seeing is totally saturated and over pixellated. Hope it works though, just have to wrap my head around it to go beyond what looks normal on here (or get a decent monitor calibrated) for posting.
Registered on March 2, 2009, 984 Posts, 2518 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on December 8, 2010 at 11:11 AM
Your repost is oversharpened. Personally i think the original looks ok in terms of processing, even with the new limits compression is going to be a challenge with that subject. Some real nice detail and a great subject. My only nit is that for me, the branch on the left disrupts the harmony of the shot a bit. :wavey:
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Maile on December 8, 2010 at 11:14 AM
Thank you Stan!!

Now the branch on the left, and "harmony", that wasn't a PUNishing nit, was it?? lol.
Registered on March 2, 2009, 984 Posts, 2518 Comments
Comment posted by Kah Kit Yoong on December 8, 2010 at 11:28 AM
Bill, I've recently touched on the processing issues also. It's not the sharpness that's a problem, it is opening the shadows too much causing a flat looking image.
Registered on September 27, 2006, 636 Posts, 10682 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Maile on December 8, 2010 at 11:45 AM
Hi Kah Kit, yes you have and I've certainly agreed with you and others in most cases. I just don't see that problem here, in the small or the larger version--I see crisp details, depth and color. In fact, I thought this one of my better processed images, honestly. I am a veritable newbie with PSE so of course it's an adjustment in thinking and in seeing things. I'm taking it all in and always appreciate everyone's feedback. :smile:
Registered on March 2, 2009, 984 Posts, 2518 Comments