Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Daybreak bull + repost
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Daybreak bull + repost

by Lon Sharp

Gallery: WildlifePosted December 14, 20102,434 views13 comments
From this morning 12/13/10. Wind Cave National Park, South Dakota.

I was looking for silhouette opportunity and ended up close (make that, TOO close) to 4 bulls. With the 200-400 it was a squeeze to come up with a clean frame. This is at 200mm, with a slight crop for tweaking the comp. D3S, ISO 1000, 1/640, hand held, f4, -0.3 matrix then some downward selective curves adjustments and some sat boost.

Commentary and criticism encouraged.

Comments

13 comments
Comment posted by Jagdeep Rajput on December 14, 2010 at 6:35 AM
Terrific silhouette and glorious skies, add up to great effect here !
Jagdeep Rajput :toast:
Registered on April 29, 2008, 686 Posts, 2857 Comments
Comment posted by Pete Bengeyfield on December 14, 2010 at 11:21 AM
Really nice. I like the frosty grass in the FGand the sky colors.
Registered on December 2, 2003, 1247 Posts, 3439 Comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on December 14, 2010 at 11:57 AM
This is very very nice Lon and I really like it as is. Yet I do have some suggestions for improvement. I find it a bit tight both top and bottom, perhaps the uncropped version has this room? You mention you boosted the saturation already, but a little extra saturation would make it pop more without making it look unnatural IMO. Lastly I wonder if it would have been possible to obtain a lower angle; this would have brought its belly above the horizon line, making him look even more impressive.
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on December 14, 2010 at 1:15 PM
Thanks for the feedback. Vincent, those were the issues I was working with/against. Primarily I wanted belly line and legs against the sky, but could not achieve that perspective with moving elk. In fact the next few clicks are progressively worse in that they edged down the swale between the foreground and far background, cutting off legs altogether. It just occurred to me that the EES guys don't have to deal with those kinds of issues, huh??!!
I made the crop trying to get less space behind, but I framed the original this way due to the butt of another elk to the left! So, here is a repost showing all I have left to work with and with a strong saturation boost. This might look a little strong in sharpening because it is a version with the in-camera sharpening still intact.
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hackley on December 14, 2010 at 4:59 PM
Very nice silhouette, the larger version looks sharp where it needs to be (head, antlers, legs) and I happen to like the original post better. It might be intersting to do a slight levels adj on just the elk to bring out more but it depends what look you are trying to display in this image. Well done.
Registered on September 17, 2009, 302 Posts, 5535 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Archer on December 14, 2010 at 8:08 PM
A beautiful Silhouette Lon!!!

Ken Archer
Registered on October 28, 2004, 222 Posts, 6683 Comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on December 14, 2010 at 11:18 PM
Lon, I like the additional room top and bottom; I do understand your framing dilemma though, but seeing the FF I would probably crop it 4:3 by taking a slice off the right. The saturation boosts works very well for the oranges, but I would reduce the effect a bit on the blues. All these are, of course, just personal preferences; either way this is a great image! :toast:
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments
Comment posted by John Tobias on December 15, 2010 at 3:33 PM
Either version is fine with me. What I really like about this shot is first the BG colors, then the sharpness of the elk, and third there is still some detail in the camera side of the elk, instead of just a black silhouette. And, if I understand you correctly the elk were moving as you were shooting. Also, I am not sure having the belly of the elk against the sky would work all that much better. Thanks very much for sharing this shot.
Registered on September 12, 2009, 2120 Posts, 6455 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Canuel on December 15, 2010 at 10:24 PM
Really nice Lon. Love the layered colors of the BG. The cut of the horizon could be nicer if lower but this one works pretty well as captured too.
Registered on September 12, 2010, 53 Posts, 660 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Gulash on December 16, 2010 at 1:42 AM
Cool image. I would suggest saturation somewhere between the original and the repost. The bit of grass in the mouth and his alert pose suggests he is about to make a run for it, lends an interesting tension to the photo.
Registered on January 28, 2005, 879 Posts, 12098 Comments
Comment posted by kiran khanzode on December 18, 2010 at 3:36 PM
Lon,

What a specimen, I love the majestic pose and the moody lighting in the background. I love it ! :toast:
Registered on February 21, 2009, 83 Posts, 428 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on January 14, 2011 at 9:46 PM
Beautiful, Lon. Very interesting reading about all of the considerations and constraints you had here. I do prefer the repost. I think it has more impact on the viewer. :toast:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by Howard Cheek on March 28, 2011 at 10:09 PM
I think the repost is better here. The sat boost adds impact, and the added space makes a big difference.
Well done :toast:
Registered on July 24, 2008, 1201 Posts, 10758 Comments