Gallery: WildlifePosted January 4, 2011257 views15 comments
Dear All
I was blessed to photograph these 6 week old tiger cubs in Jan 2010
7D , 300/f4 , f5.6, ISO 400
All C & C are most welcome
Harshad
Comments
15 comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on January 4, 2011 at 10:32 PM
INcredible lighting, super sharp. Only nit is OOF rocks in foreground *not much you could do though raising ISO and adjusting f-stop may have aided. I also would not prefer a road in the BG but that is such a trivial thing on a photograph like this
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Ajit Huilgol on January 4, 2011 at 11:43 PM
They look a little too big for 6 weeks, Harshad. For me, though, the road is not distracting, but the foreground oof rocks definitely are. The cubs are very cute.
Registered on December 19, 2008, 302 Posts, 2055 Comments
Comment posted by Max Waugh on January 4, 2011 at 11:51 PM
Nice catch light in the eyes and I like the composition against the soft background.
Agreed with Ajit on the age discrepancy. The one on the left in particular looks pretty mature, perhaps a year or two in age? At 6 weeks they'd still be little fuzz balls, probably with blue eyes.
Max
Registered on September 26, 2008, 428 Posts, 2329 Comments
Comment posted by Harshad Barve on January 5, 2011 at 1:26 AM
Thanks everyone , My eyes remained riveted on those 4 eyes so could not seen OOF rocks
BTW as per Forest rangers these cubs were born in last week of Oct 2009 and this image is created in Jan 2010 first week , So I am very sure about age ( may be between 6 weeks to 8 weeks ) and as far as size is concerned we must consider that these are cubs of world's biggest Cat
Registered on July 25, 2010, 39 Posts, 210 Comments
Comment posted by Oscar Benavides on January 5, 2011 at 5:28 AM
What a beautiful animals. I agree with Ajit on the foreground and about the age I thought the same, only 6 weeks!, unbelievable.
Registered on January 2, 2011, 12 Posts, 141 Comments
Comment posted by Butch Lama on January 5, 2011 at 9:52 AM
Beautiful shot...Harshad. I saw them when they were 8 weeks old in Oct. 09, so in Jan 10 in this image them should be around 4 months old.
Registered on July 23, 2010, 42 Posts, 316 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on January 5, 2011 at 10:11 AM
Hi Harshad,
VERY nice - those eyes are SO compelling (and you captured them very well). I like almost everything about this one - the positioning of the cats, that great eye contact (on something other than you), the touch of green in the in-focus leaves on the left, and more. The road really doesn't bother me but I have to say I did notice the out-of-focus rocks in the foreground quite quickly. I don't think those rocks are a huge deal and don't forget that most viewers aren't looking to critique/nit-pick an image like we are!!
Cheers...thanks for sharing this...
Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Max Waugh on January 5, 2011 at 10:26 AM
So either way it looks like I was wrong about my age estimate too. They sure do grow fast!
Max
Registered on September 26, 2008, 428 Posts, 2329 Comments
Comment posted by Darren Colello on January 5, 2011 at 3:40 PM
Harshad, You should be real proud of this image, it is terrific. Thanks for sharing.
Registered on July 27, 2009, 175 Posts, 1100 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hackley on January 5, 2011 at 4:53 PM
Excellent shot, wonderful detail and look from the cubs really make this shot. My eyes went right for the cubs and did not really notice the OOF rocks, so for me that is no big deal. Wonderful encounter and the larger version was a treat, way to go.
Registered on September 17, 2009, 302 Posts, 5535 Comments
Comment posted by kiran khanzode on January 5, 2011 at 10:44 PM
IMO, this is one of your best *ever*, Partner.
Registered on February 21, 2009, 83 Posts, 428 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on January 5, 2011 at 11:44 PM
Sweet!
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by Suzanne Huot on January 6, 2011 at 12:05 AM
Regardless of their correct age .To have seen and photographed this delightful pair is indeed a privaledge .And I can understand why your eyes were glued on the cubs and not the oof rock
cheers
suzanne
Registered on December 28, 2010, 32 Posts, 240 Comments
Comment posted by Sally King on January 7, 2011 at 9:39 AM
I love this image. The road in the background, no problem. The OOF rocks, no problem. Those faces would keep me looking at this image and loving it for a very long time.
Registered on December 2, 2008, 416 Posts, 4450 Comments
Comment posted by Ingrid Vekemans on January 9, 2011 at 3:41 PM
I agree with Suzanne and Sally - absolutely beautiful shot!
Registered on August 2, 2010, 138 Posts, 780 Comments
Comments
15 commentsAgreed with Ajit on the age discrepancy. The one on the left in particular looks pretty mature, perhaps a year or two in age? At 6 weeks they'd still be little fuzz balls, probably with blue eyes.
Max
BTW as per Forest rangers these cubs were born in last week of Oct 2009 and this image is created in Jan 2010 first week , So I am very sure about age ( may be between 6 weeks to 8 weeks ) and as far as size is concerned we must consider that these are cubs of world's biggest Cat
VERY nice - those eyes are SO compelling (and you captured them very well). I like almost everything about this one - the positioning of the cats, that great eye contact (on something other than you), the touch of green in the in-focus leaves on the left, and more. The road really doesn't bother me but I have to say I did notice the out-of-focus rocks in the foreground quite quickly. I don't think those rocks are a huge deal and don't forget that most viewers aren't looking to critique/nit-pick an image like we are!!
Cheers...thanks for sharing this...
Brad
Max
cheers
suzanne