Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
L.O. Owl - Vertical Pano
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

L.O. Owl - Vertical Pano

by Terry Sohl

Gallery: AvianPosted January 6, 2011296 views19 comments
Gotta love how these guys try to make themselves into a tree trunk when you approach. The difference in body shape is amazing, between the "stretched" version and the normal body posture.

So, what better way to show their "stretch" posture than a vertical pano?

Canon 20D, 400 5.6L, ISO 400, 1/1000, f7.1, 430EX @ -1 2/3, only cropping is from left and right edges of original vertical.

Comments

19 comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on January 6, 2011 at 9:23 PM
Interesting looking bird, Terry. I'm not sure that your vertical pano idea works though. My first reaction here was that the owl is abnormally stretched by something wrong in image processing. I suspect that to show that the stretching is really a normal characteristic of this owl we need to see some vertical things in the image that have not been stretched and appear normal. It certainly does have shock value this way though! :smile:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by Angela McCain on January 6, 2011 at 9:27 PM
Is this a hoax? I tend to be a little gullible, but I've never seen anything like this and well, frankly it's frightening! Kind of like the rabbit from Alice in Wonderland. Too cool if it's for real. Thanks for posting.
Registered on April 19, 2009, 367 Posts, 3589 Comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on January 6, 2011 at 9:27 PM
I agree with Steve's assessment... leave the shot as is which will show off the unique pose - otherwise it looks like it's been compressed in PS
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Terry Sohl on January 6, 2011 at 9:32 PM
Yes, it's for real!! Here's the full-frame version. Didn't do any editing/sharpening etc. to this one, just wanted to show that yes indeed, this is what they look like when they elongate themselves, trying to "be a tree".

Actually don't have it trimmed on the version on my website. Just thought I'd try the "pano" out here for reaction.

I'm used to seeing them like this, maybe that's why I prefer the trimmed one on top. The tree trunk to the right in the full-frame doesn't really add much for me.

For comparison, here's the normal body posture:
http://sdakotabirds.com/species_photos/long_eared_owl_19.htm
Registered on November 1, 2003, 513 Posts, 6889 Comments
Comment posted by Charles Gangas on January 6, 2011 at 10:06 PM
What a look-almost think he's wondering if you're buying the concealment posture. Great Job Terry, really nice capture. :toast:
Registered on August 12, 2009, 544 Posts, 2414 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on January 6, 2011 at 10:31 PM
The tree does help...a bit.....However, it still doesn't really give us something that we know is normal width. Anyway, I think that this is the best you can do with this image.. You might try using Photoshop to paste in the Owl with normal body shape beside this one to form a composite image. I did that once with a fluffed-up and un-fluffed-up warbler. I think it really communicated the difference. Anyway, assuming we know that this owl is really as he appears, it's a fine shot: nice color, detail and a bird peering right at us. :toast:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by Sally King on January 6, 2011 at 10:36 PM
I really think it's cool. I do think the full frame version works better as the crop overaccentuates the unexpected stretched posture. Love those eyes and those feet.
Registered on December 2, 2008, 416 Posts, 4450 Comments
Comment posted by Brian Gatlin on January 6, 2011 at 11:07 PM
Terry, since you posted the full-frame, I'll admit that I prefer it compositionally, but mostly because I like what the tree trunk adds to the image. However, I really like the original also, as I think the pano crop is a great way to illustrate this classic LEOW pose.
Registered on March 21, 2009, 202 Posts, 4187 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on January 6, 2011 at 11:45 PM
I've seen them do this a number of times, but never in such an open spot. I much prefer the uncropped version. Wonderful image detail - I'd love to have taken this.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments
Comment posted by Michael Twaddell on January 7, 2011 at 12:17 AM
I thought that this was some sort of joke, too! I think that Owls in general are pretty freaky creatures, and this just solidifies that for me. The larger version has some really nice detail, but I prefer the repost with the tree, as it adds something for me to compare the Owl to. Thanks for the education!
Registered on August 16, 2007, 199 Posts, 2132 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Gulash on January 7, 2011 at 1:33 AM
I didn't realize they could exhibit this behavior, pretty cool. Still looks like an issue with conversion between the old 4:3 to 16:9 format on the tv :biggrin: Amazing photo, good work. :toast:
Registered on January 28, 2005, 879 Posts, 12098 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Archer on January 7, 2011 at 4:41 AM
Both versions are strong images IMO, sweet photo Terry!!!

Ken Archer
Registered on October 28, 2004, 222 Posts, 6683 Comments
Comment posted by dan elster on January 7, 2011 at 9:43 AM
I like both versions. While I see what the others are saying about the pano version, I think it really emphasizes how neat this behavior/posturing is. Way to try something different. :toast:
Registered on September 23, 2005, 299 Posts, 2443 Comments
Comment posted by Kurt Bowman on January 7, 2011 at 10:07 AM
Terry, I have never seen this behavior before and love the post...but I like the second one MUCH better. I agree with Steve's original assessment, but do think the uncropped version looks much more normal.
Registered on June 19, 2008, 1005 Posts, 8028 Comments
Comment posted by Carol Hyman on January 7, 2011 at 10:29 AM
Terry, my reaction: Oh, my ...

What a grand way to show off the position of the bird. Unique.

Well done--both the shooting and the processing.

Even the re-post works.

Carol
Registered on January 18, 2007, 597 Posts, 8062 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Moore on January 7, 2011 at 11:46 AM
I too like the uncropped version. To me it affirms that the image was not altered. Great shot!!

Dan
Registered on February 11, 2010, 143 Posts, 1248 Comments
Comment posted by Terry Sohl on January 7, 2011 at 12:01 PM
Thanks for all the comments on composition, much appreciated!!!

Seems like many who prefer the uncropped say so because the original version on top looks odd, like it's been digital altered or "stretched". Just wanted to mention that was my intention in doing the "pano" crop, to better emphasize the vertically stretched body position these guys do when approached. I agree, the weird stretching these guys do makes the top photo look digitally altered! Which was kind of my intention.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 513 Posts, 6889 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hackley on January 7, 2011 at 3:56 PM
Very interesting since I have never heard of this and could not figure out what was going on, so this being new to me I happen to like the image with the tree trunk. A real good behavior shot and story, thanks for posting, very cool.
Registered on September 17, 2009, 302 Posts, 5535 Comments
Comment posted by Rob Drummond on January 7, 2011 at 10:23 PM
Fantastic Terry - I'd go with the repost as the vertical pano looks as if it's beem altered even when it hasn't. Amazing behaviour.

cheers
Rob
Registered on November 8, 2003, 617 Posts, 8267 Comments