Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
After The Eruption
‹ PreviousWeekly Challenge GalleryNext ›

After The Eruption

by Lucy VanSwearingen

Gallery: Weekly ChallengePosted February 24, 201144 views4 comments
My husband and I visited Mt. St. Helens about 10 years after the eruption.

The trees that were not on the ground all looked like this. Their bark was stripped, and the only limbs left were on the down"wind" side.

Even after 10 years, there was almost no vegetation. Although by now, I'll bet you couldn't tell that there was ever an eruption.

This is, of course, a scanned 35mm photo. Since I couldn't get it perfect, I decided to show the forcefulness of the damage.

Since it was already a blustery , stormy day, all I had to do was neutralize the colors, and give the photo a "watercolor" look.. I think this really reflects the chaotic, dark mood which would have taken place during this event...that is, if you could have seen through all the ash!

Comments

4 comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on February 25, 2011 at 6:41 AM
Although by now, I'll bet you couldn't tell that there was ever an eruption.
How much? :wink: Trust me, it still looks like the apocalypse.

I really really like the subject here, the tree looks awesome. Im not really sold on the watercolor clouds though, they are a bit too filter-looking for my tastes. Im wondering how it would look if the clouds were blurred, without the defined edges here. A tattered look might be appropriate for 'stormy', but an undefined look would work with the ash filled sky idea too. Just a thought.
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by Lucy VanSwearingen on February 25, 2011 at 11:01 AM
Have you been there, lately? Does it STILL look like this? I would have thought Mother Nature would have had some time to work. But, with no trees, it would be difficult. We did see some deer (no place to hide), so there must be something to eat..somewhere.

The sky is "intact". I just desaturated and tweaked the color and texture. I stumbled onto this blue color by accident and thought it would add to the "other worldliness" of the scene.

You always have the best suggestions... I will blur the BG today or tomorrow. That's easy enough. I think a very thick fog filter would SOLVE the ash problem.

I don't know whether to try to make it look realistic or look like it was on another planet. What do you think? Try both....??

I really value your opinion,,,,not just your sense of humor! So, your suggestions are ALWAYS appreciated! :wavey: :jump: :wavey:
Registered on May 23, 2009, 800 Posts, 2042 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on February 25, 2011 at 9:43 PM
It's a good shot of the snag, really captures the textures. My family and I were there about the same time and the extent of downed timber and ash covered ground was phenomenal.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on February 26, 2011 at 6:58 AM
To clarify, i was thinking along the lines of how i would have approached the shot as a straight-forward nature photo (w/o the PS work); since the tree branches are reaching out to the left (as if being hit by the explosion to the right) i probably would have done everything i could (and ND filter maybe) to get some motion in the clouds so they convey the sense of a blast or fast movement in the horizontal direction. Thats why isuggested the blur. BUt i dunno--might look aweful, just gotta try it and it sounds like your game. :wink:
I havent been back there actually in about 7 years, but last time i was there it still looked pretty devestated--depressed the heck out of me seeing all those dead and downed trees. Course it made seeing all the elk pretty easy...
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments