After The Eruption
by Lucy VanSwearingen
My husband and I visited Mt. St. Helens about 10 years after the eruption.
The trees that were not on the ground all looked like this. Their bark was stripped, and the only limbs left were on the down"wind" side.
Even after 10 years, there was almost no vegetation. Although by now, I'll bet you couldn't tell that there was ever an eruption.
This is, of course, a scanned 35mm photo. Since I couldn't get it perfect, I decided to show the forcefulness of the damage.
Since it was already a blustery , stormy day, all I had to do was neutralize the colors, and give the photo a "watercolor" look.. I think this really reflects the chaotic, dark mood which would have taken place during this event...that is, if you could have seen through all the ash!
Comments
4 commentsHow much?
I really really like the subject here, the tree looks awesome. Im not really sold on the watercolor clouds though, they are a bit too filter-looking for my tastes. Im wondering how it would look if the clouds were blurred, without the defined edges here. A tattered look might be appropriate for 'stormy', but an undefined look would work with the ash filled sky idea too. Just a thought.
The sky is "intact". I just desaturated and tweaked the color and texture. I stumbled onto this blue color by accident and thought it would add to the "other worldliness" of the scene.
You always have the best suggestions... I will blur the BG today or tomorrow. That's easy enough. I think a very thick fog filter would SOLVE the ash problem.
I don't know whether to try to make it look realistic or look like it was on another planet. What do you think? Try both....??
I really value your opinion,,,,not just your sense of humor! So, your suggestions are ALWAYS appreciated!
I havent been back there actually in about 7 years, but last time i was there it still looked pretty devestated--depressed the heck out of me seeing all those dead and downed trees. Course it made seeing all the elk pretty easy...