NPN has moved to naturephotographers.networkYou’re viewing the read-only archive of the original site (2000–2018). The community is active today, with new critiques and discussions every day.
Comment posted by Bill Fach on March 11, 2011 at 12:00 AM
Richard: This is terrific. Just what the doctor ordered. 2 thumbs up! >=))>
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1805 Posts, 26981 Comments
Comment posted by Kurt Bowman on March 11, 2011 at 12:13 AM
Richard, I never saw the first one, so had to go look before commenting. Excellent changes you made on this.
Registered on June 19, 2008, 1005 Posts, 8028 Comments
Comment posted by Bob Duff on March 11, 2011 at 6:15 AM
Yes sir, a masterful job. The backlit glow and revised BG really work well.
Registered on April 21, 2010, 160 Posts, 1675 Comments
Comment posted by Ian Wolfenden on March 11, 2011 at 6:47 AM
This does look so much stronger than the first, Richard. The dof and the lighting work really well together.
Registered on May 18, 2007, 1108 Posts, 7647 Comments
Comment posted by Derek Yow on March 11, 2011 at 8:03 AM
Excellent Richard! I really liked the first one, and where you took it with this repost is even better. The glow in the blossom's center steals the show in this version!
Registered on May 18, 2010, 26 Posts, 655 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Kennedy on March 11, 2011 at 1:05 PM
Hi Richard! Your repost has really improved an already nice photo. I agree with the other comments about the back-lit glow in the center. Nice job!
Registered on March 9, 2009, 79 Posts, 676 Comments
Comment posted by Nathan Buck on March 11, 2011 at 4:38 PM
I love the glow to the center Richard. I think the changes have worked out well.
Nathan
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1101 Posts, 13589 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on March 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM
The added contrast help tremendously. I especially like the lines in the petals, they show up so nicely in the top three petals.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by Pat Sampson on March 11, 2011 at 7:45 PM
I liked the first image Richard but I do prefer this one. It's a beautiful image - deserves whatever attention you want to give it.
pat
Registered on May 19, 2007, 953 Posts, 15989 Comments
Comment posted by Howard Cheek on March 11, 2011 at 8:55 PM
This has an "inner" light that makes it very special Richard, and the BG is perfect.
Have a great weekend!
Registered on July 24, 2008, 1201 Posts, 10758 Comments
Comment posted by Albert Darmo on March 11, 2011 at 10:04 PM
Hi Richard This is a splendid repost. the lighting and BG work wonderfully well!! Love it
Albert Darmo. Canada
Registered on November 25, 2008, 1386 Posts, 11978 Comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on March 11, 2011 at 10:20 PM
Yep, that's it. Still has the mood, but easier on the eyes.
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments
Comment posted by Phil Pogledich on March 12, 2011 at 12:04 PM
Exactly what I had in mind when I commented on the earlier version. Nice job!
Registered on August 24, 2009, 123 Posts, 3099 Comments
Comment posted by Michael Lowe on March 12, 2011 at 12:19 PM
Well done revisions.
Registered on February 11, 2004, 777 Posts, 5252 Comments
Comment posted by Krunal Janani on March 15, 2011 at 1:08 AM
Spot on with the repost
Registered on September 16, 2010, 60 Posts, 1370 Comments
Comments
15 commentsNathan
pat
Have a great weekend!
Albert Darmo. Canada