Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Barred Owl
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Barred Owl

by Steve Balke

Gallery: AvianPosted March 11, 2011207 views12 comments
Barred Owl (Strix varia)

After tramping around in the woods of the Riverwood Conservancy near Toronto recently, I was startled to look up and see this bird staring down at me. It stayed there while I clicked away trying to find the right camera settings and best view through many branches. It was a very overcast day with some sunlight coming through every once in awhile just to make photography more challenging.

This bird was very cooperative in that it stayed put, but it was a little too relaxed: after a little while it fell asleep and presented a fairly unexciting picture of an owl with closed eyes. Also, it turned out that there was only one location where I could see the whole (almost) unobstructed bird. At that location the bird completely filled the frame with just a very small clearance at top and bottom.

The original image was full frame (16 MP). This image is 17.4 MP since I expanded the canvas. I tried many ways of accomplishing the expansion: using content aware scaling; merging images from other shots; simple expansion using cloning and finally vignetting. I like this result the best. It's a combination of some simple cloning and mostly addition of a dark vignette that amounts to a dark frame around the image. This approach left the owl pixels untouched from the original except for some slight exposure adjustment.

There are plenty of owl pixels here. So, the detail is fun to examine.

All comments very welcome.

1D Mark IV, EF400 mm f/5.6L +1.4xTC: ISO 1000, 1/800s, f/10, 0 EV, NR, exposure adjustment, sharpening.

Comments

12 comments
Comment posted by Fabio Giarrizzo on March 11, 2011 at 12:21 PM
Excellent portrait of a beautiful species- Great details and exposure job with low light- Fine job, Fabio
Registered on December 3, 2010, 90 Posts, 1614 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on March 11, 2011 at 1:44 PM
The larger version looks quite nice even with the tight framing.

But why not just take off the 1.4x and save all that post processing complication?
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments
Comment posted by Monica Siri on March 11, 2011 at 2:15 PM
What a great encounter, Steve. I like the relaxed pose of this owl and the exposure control.
Beautiful image. :toast: :wavey:
Registered on September 20, 2009, 132 Posts, 3764 Comments
Comment posted by Lindy Martin on March 11, 2011 at 6:32 PM
I would like to know how you get these guys out from under their usual canopy of fir trees. Mine are all quite obscured! Wonderful detail and light. Great job Steve :toast:
Registered on March 10, 2009, 60 Posts, 169 Comments
Comment posted by Darren Colello on March 11, 2011 at 6:49 PM
Very nice detail, beautifully composed. Well done Steve. :smile:
Registered on July 27, 2009, 175 Posts, 1100 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on March 11, 2011 at 7:13 PM
The details in the bird are outstanding (especially in the larger picture). As a portrait, I don't mind the tight framing at all and the addition of the black canvas works well.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by KC Choo on March 11, 2011 at 8:21 PM
I guess shooting the 500mm straight would have been the answer, but you have managed very well anyway with your final image shown.
Registered on November 15, 2004, 519 Posts, 8278 Comments
Comment posted by Howard Cheek on March 11, 2011 at 9:00 PM
Great detail in that LP Steve, beautiful bird the Barred Owl..Maybe someday I'll be so lucky :wink:
I tried the same thing recently, I think it helps here.
Well done & have a nice weekend :toast:
Registered on July 24, 2008, 1201 Posts, 10758 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on March 11, 2011 at 10:18 PM
Nice detail and exposure Steve, even with the added canvas it still seems too tight to me. :toast:
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on March 12, 2011 at 11:11 AM
Thank you everyone. Such interesting comments! The "question of the day", first posed by Richard, was "Why didn't I just remove the 1.4x extender?" The answer: it just didn't occur to me. I think I was so startled at seeing this bird (especially in a variable, dull day, with barely a chickadee around) that I just concentrated on figuring out the best camera settings before it decided to fly away. :smile:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on March 12, 2011 at 9:02 PM
I would have done the same thing at first anyway. Get some shots before he flies off after that I would have taken off the tc. You could have gone for some portraits here as well.
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on March 13, 2011 at 1:46 PM
Thank you for your very helpful comments, Nate. I did go for some portraits at the time too. I'll post one now. :smile:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments