Cuernos: Take Two
by Richard Bernabe
Rather than bore you with a similar composition to <url=http://www.naturephotographers.net/imagecritique/ic.cgi?a=vp&pr=169479&CGISESSID=81d663965cad9d3150b227ea8334f726&u=11765>Ian's great image</url>, I thought I'd rather show something just a little different. This is moments later when we all ran up a nearby hill and tried to include the first bit of warm directional light on the foreground hills. The light and color had changed slightly, but the amazing conditions lasted for what seemed an eternity.
I had some discussions with a few of our students about the sliver of light in the bottom left corner. Some thought it should be left out of the image while I thought it was essential. What's your thoughts?
Canon EOS 5D Mk2
Canon 24-105
1/5 second @ f14 ISO 160
Comments
53 commentsI think the sliver of light adds an additional layer of depth. If you crop it out, the comp still works, but it appears more flat, and less like being there. Essentially it is your foreground interest. The image feels more dynamic because of it's inclusion.
aF
Just wondering- why did you choose ISO 160 rather than 100? If I were using a tripod, I probably wouldn't have given the ISO a second thought, especially since there wasn't any rushing water to bring into the equation. I doubt the dmall change would have effected the cloud motion?
Maybe a grey border would make the dark lower corners stand out more and not blend into the boarder.
Ian
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
The colours are out of this world, and the lines, textures and detail in the composition seem to make the most of the light.
I like the sliver of light at the bottom as it brings interest there in the absence of an immediate anchor.
Awesome
i love the light a lot
Chris
I definately like the sliver of light. It adds depth to the image and also leads into the circular light on the RH foreground which routes you to the beautiful light on the mountains.
Very nice capture as presented!!
Thank you for sharing....
Gary.