Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Mt Rainier Snow-Cave
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Mt Rainier Snow-Cave

by Ken Smith

Gallery: LandscapePosted September 4, 2011764 views23 comments
My first visit to Mt Rainier's 'ice' caves was about 20 or 30 yrs ago...when they had true blue ice, chill, and the water trickled down the snow...nowhere near cutting so large a swath to the gravel bed. Today, snow fields with melting holes are on display. Near the old original's location... still reaching out to charm and enchant.

Nikon D300, Nikon 14-24mm at 14mm with hdr of four exposures which were them photomerged in CS3. Enhanced with shadow/highlights and saturation.

Comments

23 comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on September 4, 2011 at 6:03 PM
I remember Rick Lundh's shot from near this cave (maybe the same one) about five years ago. We have similar down here, but true we don't have 'real' ice caves....have to find the Glaciers for that. This is a really neat view here except I think the shadows are too bright. I would have processed this very, very differently though, allowing things to go quite dark and using the water as a leading line towards brightness at the end of the tunnel. I'm sure it would have looked nothing like this, and that could speak to a simple difference in artistic taste more than anything. In any case, certainly a view you don't see every day!
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Basil Greber on September 4, 2011 at 6:15 PM
I think that I'd agree with Marc here. The fact that the color palette is centered so much on the midtones makes this look a bit flat to my eyes. But the view is unusual, that's for sure.
Registered on November 8, 2005, 219 Posts, 1340 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Smith on September 4, 2011 at 7:02 PM
Marc and Basil, thanks for the detailed critique. You, Marc, always take a photo to places stamped with your unique artistic eye. I can certainly see that my first reaction to the raw image was trying to display 'more' light and details of the scene...with little regard to the interplay of light and leading lines on mood and discovery by the viewer. I love learning...and trying a new approach. Here is a slightly different version and direction. Again...thx for the hints! ( feel free to download and tweek your own version...)

ps...great comments from the regulars Zach, John M...etc...! Will be trying to work this again.

John M...perfect assessment...'heavy handed'...cracks me up ...exactly how my wife describes my efforts in the kitchen. "Just threw on more salsa, eh? Yup." Life's many parallels.
Registered on September 5, 2008, 449 Posts, 2444 Comments
Comment posted by Michael R Reynolds on September 4, 2011 at 7:17 PM
Ken,
I really enjoy the perspective you have with the image. Sounds like global warming is taking its toll though. Best Regards.
Registered on February 26, 2008, 54 Posts, 812 Comments
Comment posted by John Mumaw on September 4, 2011 at 7:28 PM
A very unique view well captured! I prefer the original crop, and while I agree with Marc's observations, your repost looks a bit rushed and heavy handed. Consider spending some quality time 'developing' this one with a subtle eye. It's worth every minute you put into it.
Registered on September 9, 2005, 62 Posts, 2289 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on September 4, 2011 at 9:29 PM
That is cool, literally and figuratively. I feels like another planet.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Zack Clothier on September 4, 2011 at 11:56 PM
I've always liked these kinds of views, the light at the end of the tunnel is nice. My only nit is with the blend, the shadows here appear very bright and I would consider darkening them for some contrast as things look a bit flat, especially in the rocks and grass.
Registered on January 28, 2010, 343 Posts, 2257 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on September 5, 2011 at 12:44 AM
Awesome! Great scene. The HDR sucked the life out of it tho...in your repost it looks like you just made it darker; what it needs is contrast, a full range from white to black. Use the original exposures as a guide--there are probably parts of those shots that are properly exposed, and you can use that to gauge the proper contrast. :wavey:
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Hartmann on September 5, 2011 at 3:30 AM
Good golly, this is one heck of a capture. I agree with John, spend time with this one and you will have a winner.
Registered on January 15, 2009, 13 Posts, 772 Comments
Comment posted by Joseph Kayne on September 5, 2011 at 1:15 PM
:toast: :toast: :toast:
Registered on November 1, 2003, 573 Posts, 2619 Comments
Comment posted by R.Bill Moser on September 5, 2011 at 1:48 PM
This is a great scene. But I think the shadows are too bright here.You nedd a contrast boost here. It looks kind of flat. But I do like the composition.
Registered on January 29, 2010, 285 Posts, 4281 Comments
Comment posted by Soubhik Patranabis on September 5, 2011 at 3:34 PM
Wow ! feels like a different world ..
Registered on January 25, 2010, 54 Posts, 610 Comments
Comment posted by Dorin Bofan on September 5, 2011 at 4:41 PM
This is super cool, Ken! I agree with the other suggestions and for some reason, my eye wants to see more of the ice above.
Registered on April 30, 2007, 122 Posts, 3086 Comments
Comment posted by Hamed Musharbak on September 5, 2011 at 6:24 PM
i think you did a great job with a processing

i love this scene

Hamed
Registered on June 1, 2009, 372 Posts, 2282 Comments
Comment posted by Joseph Campisi on September 5, 2011 at 8:07 PM
I remember shots of those old ice caves in books from years back Ken.

I agree with some of the previous comments. The repost basically looks like just a darker version of the original. More contrast is what's needed here. This image is definitely worth working on till you get it right, it's a fantastic and otherworldly scene!
Registered on November 24, 2008, 304 Posts, 3211 Comments
Comment posted by Ben Horne on September 5, 2011 at 8:13 PM
I agree that the HDR effect is definitely too strong here. Don't be afraid of contrast. Along with digital came the myth that you have to show detail in even the darkest shadow. Not true. Rich dark tone is what helps to give an image impact.
Registered on August 27, 2009, 51 Posts, 959 Comments
Comment posted by Wade Hardy on September 5, 2011 at 10:55 PM
Really Really awesome shot! If it were mine, I might darken the overall image - especailly the shadows.
Registered on May 2, 2006, 121 Posts, 1824 Comments
Comment posted by Floris van Breugel on September 5, 2011 at 11:03 PM
Looks like a real big chamber! I remember reading about how those crystaline caves used to be present on Rainier, but no longer.. made me real sad. I agree with the others regarding the processing. These are dark and cold caves - I'd suggest letting the processing make you feel that.
Registered on December 19, 2008, 306 Posts, 4840 Comments
Comment posted by Jesse Estes on September 6, 2011 at 1:41 AM
Nice Ken! I like a combination of the 2 versions here. I like the light exposure for the snow/ice and that dark exposure for the rocks and the water. Just my 2 cents...
Registered on April 13, 2011, 20 Posts, 174 Comments
Comment posted by Harry Lichtman on September 6, 2011 at 2:26 PM
Ken - The processing comments aside, I think there may be too much FG. The real interest is in the ice walls and the midground rocks, but much of the brightness is in the FG water. A faster shutter may have rendered more detail here. Beautiful hidden word you uncovered. :toast:
Registered on September 17, 2010, 304 Posts, 3507 Comments
Comment posted by Colin H Sillerud on September 6, 2011 at 11:08 PM
Very lovely Ken,

Great lines, and the egg-shell-ing of the ceiling is spectacular. Nice interest throughout.

The only question I have is, what was the sun doing? If it was moving towards the far end of the cave, I think I would have shot it later so that the light at the end was stronger vs. the light coming from behind you.
Registered on May 26, 2011, 17 Posts, 58 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on September 6, 2011 at 11:27 PM
Spectacular Ken. I continue to be fascinated with these ice cave images and this one is no exception. This isn't really a nit, but a suggestion. If it were mine, I might be tempted to drop down the highlights in the rocks just to reduce what comes across as reflecting glare - or like this was artificially lit. But that's very minor. I also see a couple of small sensor dust spots in the water at the bottom. Otherwise, I just think this is other-worldly.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Smith on September 7, 2011 at 7:06 AM
Wow! Thanks for all the comments.

This is a cave with the largest opening behind the camera...which is why there seems so much light and shadow in the foreground...this pov was approx 20 feet from the wide mouth yawning open to the sun and blue sky. The light at the end of the tunnel was created by a large skylight opening approx shaped like a diamond with 20 feet across at the wide horizontal and 45 feet in a vertical diagonal. The sun was overhead, as this time of day was 2 PM. The whole scene and this cave is prolly mostly gone, melted and downstream by now...70 degree days. Ken S
Registered on September 5, 2008, 449 Posts, 2444 Comments