Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Mountain Top at Snowbird
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Mountain Top at Snowbird

by Paul DeCesare

Gallery: LandscapePosted September 18, 2011625 views18 comments
Went to a business training seminar at Snowbird Lodge in Utah this past week. After watching the sunset and weather patterns for 3 days, I decided take the last tram up to the 11,000 ft peak on my last night there, to try and capture the amazing light that would hit right at sunset. I had a few things going against me: no tripod, no graduated ND filters, and that last tram would be heading back down FOUR minutes before the sun would hit the horizon, which was the shot I had hoped to get, but at least I ended up with this scene.

To get the shot, I auto-bracketed and took three handheld shots as steady as I could, all at f/8, ISO 640, with my 16-35mm Canon lens set at about 25mm on my 5D2. The three images were too bright at first, so I had to roll the three-image "bracket set" down all the way EV-wise to get one image where the sky wasn't blown out. I couldn't manually adjust shutter speed like I do on a tripod because the composition would have been too far off to get a good HDR merge in Photomatix, so I went with a modified auto-bracket so the three shots would fire quickly (while I held my breath, lol).

After Photomatix, I boosted contrast so I could eliminate that swashy HDR look, and actually had to CUT saturation on Yellows due to the mountain mist being so well backlit. It's actually still a little strong IMO. The last step was to select the highlights onto a new layer (neat trick: CTRL Click the RGB composite Channel, then Copy & Paste) and use a 30.0 Gaussian blur just on that layer to create a sort of Orton effect on the trees. You do have to fade the layer way back of course. And so, that's ONE way to capture a sunset in the mountains when you don't have the gear you need... :wink:

I wouldn't normally plant the sun dead center, but given the way the mountain ridges all point there I'm thinking it works. But I'd appreciate a different set of eyes on this scene, let me know if it does anything for you, or if it's just a bit cliche. I included a larger version too, PLEASE view that, the initial image is pretty blah.

Thanks!

[Edited to fix really bad grammar, and clarify some image specs]

Comments

18 comments
Comment posted by Andreas Resch on September 18, 2011 at 6:17 AM
I wasn't completely sold on the shot by looking at the small version but after having seen the large one I got this one wrapped up and bagged. I guess it's all the little details in the trees that got lost in the small version that really shine in the big one for me.
Registered on November 14, 2007, 322 Posts, 6101 Comments
Comment posted by Jorne de Bruin on September 18, 2011 at 6:29 AM
I think you did very well wihtout a tripod and limited time Paul, I like how you;ve placed the sun in this one and the rays seem to be illuminating the scene directly. Great scene and well captured!
Registered on June 26, 2008, 178 Posts, 2136 Comments
Comment posted by Peter Richter on September 18, 2011 at 6:57 AM
Paul. this is a very consistent composition for me. The static character reflects the serene atmosphere of this scene well to me. Perfect exposure and processing to my eye, I can enjoy all the delightful details especially in the larger version.

Peter
Registered on November 10, 2010, 218 Posts, 2723 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Chambers on September 18, 2011 at 8:53 AM
The FG and mountains look great, and I love the deeply saturated color, but I'm afraid the sky still retains that HDR look. Can't offer any suggestions on that though as I gave up on HDR's a long time ago due to total ineptness on my part.
Registered on April 10, 2005, 753 Posts, 21216 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on September 18, 2011 at 11:25 AM
Looks pretty nice to me, Paul. I'm not seeing much trace of the HDR here, though the Orton may be a tad heavy IMO. Good job finding a nicely layered and balanced comp under those circumstances. Guess you can't complain too much if this is the type of scenery you get to shoot at a business training session. :smile:
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Nancy Lea Sandy on September 18, 2011 at 11:54 AM
There's some great things going for you here. The lovely golden glow of the mist and the solid bulk of the ridges behind the row of trees is sweet. The sun and the lower half of the sky is nice too. I'm having a little trouble getting that luscious blue of the upper sky to work for me, though. Probably because it is so much colder than the rest of the image, it seems a little out of place. Probably just me though. Way to mix business and pleasure!
Registered on January 24, 2011, 576 Posts, 6942 Comments
Comment posted by Scott Smorra on September 18, 2011 at 12:17 PM
I think this turned out very well for you Paul. You did a great job dealing with the tools you had on hand. I really like the colors and the how you were able to capture some softer light while shooting directly into the sun.
Registered on November 2, 2009, 161 Posts, 2143 Comments
Comment posted by Jeff Hackett on September 18, 2011 at 12:18 PM
Very nice Paul! I was hoping to see some images from this trip and this one does not disappoint. Hope to see more!
:toast:
Registered on March 13, 2006, 65 Posts, 1119 Comments
Comment posted by Joseph Campisi on September 18, 2011 at 1:03 PM
Gorgous light and scene Paul! My only nit is that the HDR is throwing this off a little bit for me. I think if you could reduce the yellows and cyans a bit, the colors would look a little more natural.
Registered on November 24, 2008, 304 Posts, 3211 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on September 18, 2011 at 1:04 PM
I think you did very well here Paul. The small version didn't seem to do much for me, but when I clicked on the large version I really enjoyed it. I think you did great job making this work.

Nick Bristol
lone Rock, WI
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on September 18, 2011 at 4:34 PM
It turned out great, Paul. Foreground, middle ground and background all hold a lot of interest, and the light is handled well.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on September 18, 2011 at 4:39 PM
The large version does give the feeling of being right there. Lovely view and a fine landscape image!
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Chamberlain on September 18, 2011 at 6:10 PM
Well, if this is what you come up with when you have limited time and equipment to get, I'd be afraid to see what hapens when you are fully equiped and prepared. I think this is pretty impressive, especially handheld.

Chris
Registered on March 13, 2007, 500 Posts, 8365 Comments
Comment posted by Bruce King on September 18, 2011 at 8:52 PM
No problems with this one Paul and considering the circumstances I think it's actually pretty impressive. Nice light on an interesting fg and the layers pull the eye to the sunset. Well done.
Registered on January 14, 2010, 276 Posts, 2212 Comments
Comment posted by Paul DeCesare on September 18, 2011 at 11:38 PM
As usual, y'all have provided extremely helpful (and kind) feedback, much appreciated... I've read every reply and will head back to make a few changes. I agree, I need to tweak back the Orton, blue sky at top and the yellowish cast, but overall I think I'll make it a keeper. Marc was absolutely right, considering this was a business trip with 40+ hours of training on corporate document control systems, I have zero complaints about scenery like this, that was only a 7-minute tram ride away.

I'm pleased with the outcome being I had to hand-hold this one, but there was a cost: at ISO 640 and f/8 which gave me just enough to get the three shots, the DOF and noise levels are no where near the quality had I shot on my CF tripod at ISO 100 and f/13 which seems to be a sweet spot on my particular copy of the 16-35mm. I'm not sure a larger print will have the IQ I'd want... guess I'll leave the Orton as is and print it on Somerset Velvet and hide the noise, lol. It looks fine reduced down for web thankfully. Next time I'm renting a tripod of some sort! Seriously, there is no substitute for a stable supported camera.

Again, thanks for the feedback, I do need to revisit this one in PS.
Registered on August 31, 2007, 29 Posts, 202 Comments
Comment posted by Sarah Marino on September 19, 2011 at 1:16 AM
Hi Paul - the light here is wonderful! I have tried to photograph scenes like this with almost no success, mostly because of the processing challenges. It seems like you overcame those limitations and produced a really nice image. Nice work!
Registered on November 10, 2008, 23 Posts, 393 Comments
Comment posted by Anil Rao on September 19, 2011 at 4:05 AM
I love how this has turned out, Paul. Very nice!
Registered on November 15, 2003, 234 Posts, 4923 Comments
Comment posted by Dean Sauskojus on September 19, 2011 at 2:20 PM
Gosh this is a great image Paul. What's not to like. I can see detail in the mountains, layer after layer. Beautiful warm light. Great comp. A struggle to get and it'll take me awhile to figure out but wow you nailed it. I'm of the opinion that I wouldn't change anything. Fine fine work!
Registered on September 29, 2009, 137 Posts, 2659 Comments