Went to a business training seminar at Snowbird Lodge in Utah this past week. After watching the sunset and weather patterns for 3 days, I decided take the last tram up to the 11,000 ft peak on my last night there, to try and capture the amazing light that would hit right at sunset. I had a few things going against me: no tripod, no graduated ND filters, and that last tram would be heading back down FOUR minutes before the sun would hit the horizon, which was the shot I had hoped to get, but at least I ended up with this scene.
To get the shot, I auto-bracketed and took three handheld shots as steady as I could, all at f/8, ISO 640, with my 16-35mm Canon lens set at about 25mm on my 5D2. The three images were too bright at first, so I had to roll the three-image "bracket set" down all the way EV-wise to get one image where the sky wasn't blown out. I couldn't manually adjust shutter speed like I do on a tripod because the composition would have been too far off to get a good HDR merge in Photomatix, so I went with a modified auto-bracket so the three shots would fire quickly (while I held my breath, lol).
After Photomatix, I boosted contrast so I could eliminate that swashy HDR look, and actually had to CUT saturation on Yellows due to the mountain mist being so well backlit. It's actually still a little strong IMO. The last step was to select the highlights onto a new layer (neat trick: CTRL Click the RGB composite Channel, then Copy & Paste) and use a 30.0 Gaussian blur just on that layer to create a sort of Orton effect on the trees. You do have to fade the layer way back of course. And so, that's ONE way to capture a sunset in the mountains when you don't have the gear you need...
I wouldn't normally plant the sun dead center, but given the way the mountain ridges all point there I'm thinking it works. But I'd appreciate a different set of eyes on this scene, let me know if it does anything for you, or if it's just a bit cliche. I included a larger version too, PLEASE view that, the initial image is pretty blah.
Thanks!
[Edited to fix really bad grammar, and clarify some image specs]
Comments
18 commentsPeter
Nick Bristol
lone Rock, WI
Chris
I'm pleased with the outcome being I had to hand-hold this one, but there was a cost: at ISO 640 and f/8 which gave me just enough to get the three shots, the DOF and noise levels are no where near the quality had I shot on my CF tripod at ISO 100 and f/13 which seems to be a sweet spot on my particular copy of the 16-35mm. I'm not sure a larger print will have the IQ I'd want... guess I'll leave the Orton as is and print it on Somerset Velvet and hide the noise, lol. It looks fine reduced down for web thankfully. Next time I'm renting a tripod of some sort! Seriously, there is no substitute for a stable supported camera.
Again, thanks for the feedback, I do need to revisit this one in PS.