Gallery: LandscapePosted October 16, 2011280 views14 comments
Nonstandard composition. Does this work?
Canon5DMk2 EF24-105mm f/4L at 24mm. Polarizer
iso 50, f16, 8sec
2 vertical shot pano
Comments
14 comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on October 16, 2011 at 9:50 PM
dreamy and majestic. I'm a little uncertain about the majority of the foreground (before the rock). I think due to the WA and use of polarizer that it's visually confusing and skews the perspective. I'd crop from where the log enters the water
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Wayne Jones on October 16, 2011 at 10:04 PM
Works for me! I might even make it more "nonstandard" by shaving just a bit off the right side to focus more on the falls and autumn leaves. You might even keep the square format by cropping a bit from the bottom, too, but I am not sure if that would take out too much of the underwater view. I am really enjoying all the greens, and I think the exposure and processing are right on. If you are not averse to tampering, that bright spot (leaf reflection?) left of center might be toned down. Altogether, a lot to see in this delightful image.
Registered on April 18, 2007, 953 Posts, 6435 Comments
Comment posted by Nancy Lea Sandy on October 16, 2011 at 10:57 PM
Pretty sweet. I love the sense of mystery. I'm intriqued by the underwater part but I'm not sure it adds a lot to the overall image. I'll let the more experienced weigh in on that. As is, it's an engaging and beautiful image
Registered on January 24, 2011, 576 Posts, 6942 Comments
Comment posted by Floris van Breugel on October 17, 2011 at 1:30 AM
There are some lovely elements to this, Daniel. I love the falls and the two trees above it, as well as the large round boulders. I personally hate logs as foreground elements, so that portion of the composition does not work for me. Sounds like Luke has a similar opinion, though, so maybe it's not just me.
Registered on December 19, 2008, 306 Posts, 4840 Comments
Comment posted by Tom Hilton on October 17, 2011 at 7:52 AM
I like it!
Registered on September 19, 2011, 68 Posts, 668 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Chambers on October 17, 2011 at 10:24 AM
Very nice Daniel. I'm really enjoying the lushness of the scene. I might crop some off the bottom (halfway to the log). I like the comp a lot. Nice work!
Registered on April 10, 2005, 753 Posts, 21216 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on October 17, 2011 at 11:04 AM
Nice back and forth shot. Like the darkness here, as it lends itself to the quiet mood.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Goldwasser on October 17, 2011 at 3:38 PM
This is quite nice, I love the lush, peaceful feel. I think most of the interest is in the upper right portion - any comps that focus more on that scene?
Registered on May 10, 2009, 127 Posts, 970 Comments
Comment posted by Matt Anderson on October 17, 2011 at 6:54 PM
Daniel it works for me. Lots for my eye to experience.
I think this is great.
Registered on September 6, 2007, 346 Posts, 2696 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on October 17, 2011 at 7:30 PM
Very nice Daniel. I really enjoy the large version which shows this off so much better. I too would be tempted to crop this right where the water line is on the log.
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on October 17, 2011 at 11:01 PM
I like the light, but could see cropping the foreground up to where the water hits the log. The darker tones help amp the saturation, which I like.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by David Edwards on October 18, 2011 at 4:55 AM
A beautiful shot, Daniel. Wonderful processing of the greens and yellows creating a very enchanting mood. The large version really shows off the wonderful details. I really like your comp, but agree re cropping the blurry fg water as is tends to suck my eye down into it.
Registered on December 6, 2008, 142 Posts, 2623 Comments
Comment posted by Alex Mody on October 18, 2011 at 1:10 PM
It works, indeed. Good stuff!
Registered on December 25, 2007, 163 Posts, 1896 Comments
Comment posted by Michael J Greene, on October 18, 2011 at 4:03 PM
Daniel,
I think it works great if you crop up on the foreground up to the log showing just a bit of the submerged parts. The rest of the picture is absolutely beautiful.
Michael
Registered on June 18, 2009, 86 Posts, 2317 Comments
Comments
14 commentsI think this is great.
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
I think it works great if you crop up on the foreground up to the log showing just a bit of the submerged parts. The rest of the picture is absolutely beautiful.
Michael