Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Steelhead Falls
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Steelhead Falls

by Marylynne Diggs

Gallery: LandscapePosted March 9, 2012281 views10 comments
Every now and then, I face a waterfall nemesis. I have two decent shots of this waterfall, but my new plan is Memorial Day Weekend in the evening, when the sun will be about as high and far north as possible, thereby lighting the falls and canyon from behind me.

This is a blend of 4 exposures, and I still had to position a tree to block the sun a bit (and still got some blown out sky)

When I go back, I'd like to nail the composition as well as exposure, soI'm especially interested in whether y'all think it would be better without the tree. I like the contrast of the orange and the intimacy it provides, but....

Comments

10 comments
Comment posted by Andreas Resch on March 10, 2012 at 5:28 AM
I don't mind the tree - together with the rocks at the bottom, the ridge on the left and the branch at the top it creates a nice frame. On top of that you get a better depth.
I'm not sure if the harsh light works though. While it creates a very "happy" mood in the shot, it throws the balance off and makes the left side very dominant. As there are quite some clouds in the sky I might have waited for a moment where the sun would be covered and give that a try. That might also help with your problems of the high dynamic range. Little technical observation - there are quite some chromatic aberrations in the upper left area. Never forget about them. Usually they can be removed quite nicely by the RAW converters.
Registered on November 14, 2007, 322 Posts, 6101 Comments
Comment posted by Dietrich Gloger on March 10, 2012 at 6:30 AM
I like the composition and I agree with Andreas: The tree works well and provides good framing and depth to the scene. The light is not bad for such a scene- I like the natural look, but I can also agree that more dramatic light or warmer sunset light will be beneficial.
Registered on January 26, 2007, 360 Posts, 9876 Comments
Comment posted by R.Bill Moser on March 10, 2012 at 12:44 PM
I love how you framed this scene. The light is ok and i think it works here. But of course it would have been beneficial if you had a more dramatic sky or sunset/sunrise lighting here. I agree with Andreas that the left side is a bit dominant.
Registered on January 29, 2010, 285 Posts, 4281 Comments
Comment posted by Marylynne Diggs on March 10, 2012 at 12:57 PM
Thanks for the feedback on the tree. I do have another one without the tree, which also removes the top left where the ca's are particularly problematic. I could also crop down to keep the tree at right but lose some of the top left which might rebalance the composition as well. I'll play with that and re-post.

I always seem to get ca's with my Sigma 10-20mm, and of course the exposure blend and my gradient tool darkening the sky added to that. I rarely do anything to control them in post except click the defringe edges (either all or highlight) in LR. I included a screen capture of the ca's and the available tools in LR...I never use the sliders, and it seems that they function more to slide the aberrations toward one color or another (i.e. move toward yellow turns them yellow, etc.). I assume this is to reduce color contrast between the aberration and its background color. Any suggestions on how to handle these better in post will be much appreciated. I do stop down when possible to reduce them, but both my sigma and canon 24-105 have notable ca's on a regular basis.
Registered on December 14, 2010, 122 Posts, 1034 Comments
Comment posted by Marylynne Diggs on March 10, 2012 at 1:45 PM
Here is a version with the exposure on the left bank reduced and the top cropped a bit. I think it feels a little more balanced, but I still can't wait to head back in better conditions.
Registered on December 14, 2010, 122 Posts, 1034 Comments
Comment posted by Andreas Resch on March 10, 2012 at 2:26 PM
Hi,

which version of Lightroom do you use? If you have Lightroom 3 or maybe even 4 then these versions include a profile for the Sigma 10-20mm lens. In the "Lens Corrections" section you can enable the "Enable Profile Corrections" option under "Profile" and Lightroom should take care of your lens issues.
Otherwise if you have an older version of Lightroom, just zoom into the problem area at 300% and move the aberration sliders to the left and right until the situation gets better. Your problem looks like a red/cyan issue which means that you might have to move that slider to the negative side.
Registered on November 14, 2007, 322 Posts, 6101 Comments
Comment posted by Marylynne Diggs on March 10, 2012 at 4:00 PM
Thanks, Andreas. I have LR 3.3 and 4.0 on the way. I never used the lens correction for CA's just for vignetting and distortion. Thanks a million. I'll give that shot.
Registered on December 14, 2010, 122 Posts, 1034 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on March 10, 2012 at 4:25 PM
Looks like a neat spot and I like the tree on the right along with the color and swirling of the river. I agree that you can probably get better lighting and it might be a mild overcast with some texture in the sky. You'd still get good colors, but much reduced contrast.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on March 10, 2012 at 5:26 PM
Marylynne,

So glad you decided to post here. This is an excellent view and composition. I like the presence of the tree and the overhanging branches as those work well to break up the otherwise washed out sky. And here's a case where the higher ss and freezing of the water action reveals some nice texture and detail in the water - and I really like the color throughout.

I'm sure there are good comps without the tree, but I rather like this and the use of framing. In fact I might even suggest a little more of the trunk, and also the rocks at the bottom, be included. Hopefully you have that option. Definitely a place to return and really work the area; looks like lots of potential. What you have here I think is excellent.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Patrick O'Healy on November 27, 2015 at 2:18 PM
Marylynne,
Thank you for posting this.  I particularly like how it stimulated wonderful and educational comments from the other posters.  I agree that the tree adds to the image and think the second image you posted is much more powerful and pleasing.  I wonder how the shot would look if you were to burn the left hillside a bit.
Registered on March 13, 2011, 326 Posts, 1679 Comments