Gallery: FloraPosted May 2, 201260 views11 comments
Not sure what bloom this is... taken from a flower garden in PHoenix. hand held, nikon d700 with 70-200,2.8 lens at 200mm, 200 iso, 1/1000 at f4.5.
Comments
11 comments
Comment posted by Ramamohan Pai on May 2, 2012 at 9:08 PM
They seem to be Mexican Petunia to me. I like how you arranged them in a line, Sally. Vignette helps put the spot light on the blooms.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 550 Posts, 9037 Comments
Comment posted by Miro Susta on May 2, 2012 at 11:55 PM
Sally, this photo presents wonderful colors, highlights of light and shadows and therefore nice contrast. Well separated from BG. Nicely done. Would like to see a larger version.
Registered on August 18, 2006, 719 Posts, 3736 Comments
Comment posted by Avi Hirschfield on May 3, 2012 at 2:48 AM
Very nice and I especially love that color
Registered on November 1, 2003, 518 Posts, 2114 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Yeoh on May 3, 2012 at 9:06 PM
Sally:
Nice arrangement of these triplet. The light seem a little harsh and the use of a difuser may help reduce the glare.
Registered on September 1, 2009, 588 Posts, 8184 Comments
Comment posted by Howard Cheek on May 4, 2012 at 1:15 PM
I like the three overlapping in a row Sally, bright light but well managed.
I agree with Ram, the vignetting works nicely for this one.
Well done
Registered on July 24, 2008, 1201 Posts, 10758 Comments
Comment posted by Sally Wood on May 4, 2012 at 7:55 PM
Thanks for the feedback all, I am going to go in and see if I can work with the brightness on the blooms and blur more of he back ground.. what caught myt eye was that they were all lined up in a row like this........... isn't that cute!
Registered on March 8, 2012, 39 Posts, 509 Comments
Comment posted by Sally Wood on May 4, 2012 at 8:36 PM
reposting .. I have worked to take some of the "glare" from the blooms.. these caught my eye originally because the 3 were right together like this.. I did not have a diffuser with me,, and didn't think fast enough to create one, which I certainly probably could have done. thanks for the feedback.
Registered on March 8, 2012, 39 Posts, 509 Comments
Comment posted by Bob&Charly Nelson on May 4, 2012 at 9:39 PM
Both are well done Sally. I think I lean towards the second because of the light and color. Both are well done in my opinion.
Bob
Registered on October 27, 2005, 289 Posts, 4202 Comments
Comment posted by Sally Wood on May 4, 2012 at 9:50 PM
Final repost... worked to reduce glare and highlights...
Registered on March 8, 2012, 39 Posts, 509 Comments
Comment posted by Albert Darmo on May 4, 2012 at 10:52 PM
Hi sally I knew you would come through with a better version, In the repost you have eliminated the harsh light The arrangemeent, color and detail are very pleasing now
Albert Darmo
Registered on November 25, 2008, 1386 Posts, 11978 Comments
Comment posted by Ian Wolfenden on May 7, 2012 at 7:41 AM
Nice choice to vignette this little group, Sally - I like the high contrast look this helps produce
Registered on May 18, 2007, 1108 Posts, 7647 Comments
Comments
11 commentsNice arrangement of these triplet. The light seem a little harsh and the use of a difuser may help reduce the glare.
I agree with Ram, the vignetting works nicely for this one.
Well done
Bob
Albert Darmo