This was my first attempt at a twilight/star blend, done June 2011, right after reading Floris Van Breugel's
excellent tutorial on the subject here at NPN. At the time, I was living in Los Angeles, and this was the closest otherworldly location I knew of. I later found out that Floris had in fact done the same thing at this location (Vasquez Rocks, CA) - and I had come up with a similar composition to his, since this is really the best angle on the formations and the leading lines are obvious. I think he
did it better, though.
Due to the unintended comp stomp, I don't like the image as much as I once did, but it's still one of my only twilight images. I feel the highlights and saturation in the landscape might be a bit much, although that's exacerbated a bit by the smaller web-sharpened version.
Nikon D200 + 20mm f/2.8D Nikkor
Landscape: f/11, 30 sec, ISO 100
Sky gradient: f/11, 10 sec, ISO 100
Stars: f/2.8, 30 sec, ISO 1600
Comments
7 commentsTechnically this is very nice. Great blend. The only portion that looks a bit soft is directly below the top peaks, on the right side. Fuzzy almost. Hard to tell at this size. It's so difficult to blend night scenes. Perhaps a bit less saturation and brightness on the foreground rocks as well. Unless there was a low light of some type coming from the rear top left and right. I understand why you did this though. It helps to accentuate the foreground. Would personally tone it down a little without losing shadow detail.
I think what's going on with the fuzzy edge is something with my original blend - the blown sky from the foreground exposure was bleeding into the landscape, and I had to re-paint the edge via a mask and the clone stamp - probably used too feathered of a mask or too soft of a brush in that area.
I agree on toning down the foreground - I hadn't really given the image a critical look in a long while, until I posted it here. What I was originally going for in the foreground was the bluish late-twilight, almost moonlit look in the highlights. It looks much less so in the full version, though - I think the web sharpening I used brightened up the detail too much.