Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
St. Helens' Fall
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

St. Helens' Fall

by Alex Noriega

Gallery: LandscapePosted September 30, 2012583 views23 comments
Please click the Purchase Print link above to view it on a dark background - really helps make this particular image pop.

Washington's Mount St. Helens at twilight in autumn. Stopped over on a whim en route from Centralia to Portland to take my new (to me) D300 on a test run. Good to be back to a workhorse/tank body, although I'll miss the dynamic range of the D7000.

I considered titling this "Volcanic Twilight IV", but I think it's dissimilar enough (without a reflecting lake) and unique enough to bust out of the official series.

I like the overall autumn-esque hues of the final image, without any traditional autumn foliage. I also like how the foreground stump sort of mirrors the mountain, as it looks like it erupted out to the upper-right.

There was an EXTREMELY long-lasting and colorful sunset to the west, casting VERY warm light on the landscape even as the stars began to shine, as the post-sunset light filtered through the clouds. I've never seen stars when that warm of light was still on the landscape, prior to last night (although I did still have to wait to make the star exposure, as they weren't showing up in-camera at that time).

There seems to be a misunderstanding on how I make these twilight images: the "star exposure" is literally JUST for the white points of light. There's no major "blend" going on here. Without blending, this would be the exact same image without white points in the sky. All I do is overlay the stars and make them look pretty.

Nikon D300, Nikkor 10-24mm
Main exposure: ISO 200, f/11, 15 sec
Star exposure: ISO 800, f/3.5, 30 sec

Comments

23 comments
Comment posted by Joerg Bonner on September 30, 2012 at 2:26 PM
what amazing image!! seriously, this is insanely beautiful!! great work!
Registered on September 5, 2011, 44 Posts, 221 Comments
Comment posted by Nathan Apodaca on September 30, 2012 at 5:46 PM
Been a while since I saw a pic of Mount St. Helens. This one captures it very nicely. No nits at all...
Registered on November 16, 2011, 67 Posts, 1127 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on September 30, 2012 at 6:33 PM
Nice job on this one!
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Teller on September 30, 2012 at 6:38 PM
Great composition. This is extremely well seen and executed. I don't have any nits or other comments. :eek:
Registered on August 23, 2010, 1162 Posts, 6692 Comments
Comment posted by Aaron Feinberg on September 30, 2012 at 6:42 PM
Yea...these twilight shots are nuts. Thanks for continuing to explain it. On my list of things to try :)

aF
Registered on October 26, 2009, 399 Posts, 2789 Comments
Comment posted by Jeff Hackett on September 30, 2012 at 7:03 PM
Awesome! I love everything going on here.
:toast:
Registered on March 13, 2006, 65 Posts, 1119 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on September 30, 2012 at 7:38 PM
Fascinating comp and colors. ♦ I'm a bit equivocal about the stars. I find myself focusing on them instead of the other elements in the scene.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Peter Coskun on September 30, 2012 at 10:33 PM
This is just awesome Alex. I'm not sure how many more times I can say that about your work, but you just keep posting winner after winner. These are my favorite kinds of shots, there is something just so fascinating about the night sky and seeing the landscape that just pulls me into these scenes. I don't have any nits, but just an observation. The image looks like it needs a CW tilt, but having never been there I can't say if it truly does or not. Just the appearance.
Registered on October 31, 2011, 170 Posts, 1240 Comments
Comment posted by Basil Greber on October 1, 2012 at 2:10 AM
This is awesome, Alex. I love how the volcano also looks a bit like a tree stump. :smile: Love your recent work, all of it.
Registered on November 8, 2005, 219 Posts, 1340 Comments
Comment posted by Eva McDermott on October 1, 2012 at 7:04 AM
Another stunning image Alex. The detail of foreground and mid ground features is exquisite. The twilight sky, gorgeous. I am really enjoying your series of images.
Registered on January 4, 2009, 1015 Posts, 13229 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Chambers on October 1, 2012 at 1:51 PM
One winner after another! Everything you post lately is a winner! I really like this, even more so than some of your others. The beautiful color cast upon the FG stump is breathtaking IMO, and the golden grass is wonderful too. DELICIOUS!
Registered on April 10, 2005, 753 Posts, 21216 Comments
Comment posted by Wick Smith on October 1, 2012 at 3:35 PM
Your star shot series is really stunning. I've done a lot of night time shooting, but have not played with the subtle insertion of the stars through a lighten layer as of yet. That's next on my agenda due to your very tasteful and realistic application of this technique. Super job on this one and the last several you have posted. :toast:
Registered on June 12, 2009, 91 Posts, 379 Comments
Comment posted by Shantikara Valuska on October 1, 2012 at 4:13 PM
Another great night shot from you!
:toast:
Registered on July 25, 2011, 38 Posts, 451 Comments
Comment posted by Carey Closs on October 1, 2012 at 6:07 PM
Amazing image. I like how the swirls in the stump blend with the swirls in the sky and how the volcano itself actually resembles the hollowed out stump.
Registered on April 15, 2012, 107 Posts, 326 Comments
Comment posted by jack jaeger jr on October 1, 2012 at 7:45 PM
Sweet photo and website !
Registered on April 2, 2012, 26 Posts, 355 Comments
Comment posted by Alex Noriega on October 2, 2012 at 2:37 AM
Thanks everyone! This is definitely one of my recent favorites - funny how your favorite images sometimes fall in your lap, and don't involve a big planned trip or anything.

Peter, you may be right that it needs a slight CW rotation - but I'm not sure. I was going off the grasses in the center, which are close to perfectly vertical - although the ones on the left lean left, these were all a bit windswept on that ridge, so that may explain it. I've looked at some other images of St Helens, and they're mostly taken from the Johnston Ridge Observatory, which is about a mile east of this spot, and has a more straight-on view of the crater. I think since I was further to the west of such a view, the western (right) lip of the crater appears higher than in most other images, since it's closer. I didn't use a bubble level (as I had it built-in on the D7000 and this was my first image with the D300, didn't have one) - but I believe my thinking during composition was that I wanted the crater "pointing" into the image leftward, while the stump pointed rightward.

Tony: I can't do without my precious stars! They're a bit more subtle/soft/glowing in the full version - the web sharpening makes them stand out more than intended.
Registered on May 19, 2012, 80 Posts, 195 Comments
Comment posted by Kah Kit Yoong on October 2, 2012 at 10:29 AM
I think I like this the best of your star photos. Great light on the foreground and composition.
Registered on September 27, 2006, 636 Posts, 10682 Comments
Comment posted by Zack Clothier on October 2, 2012 at 10:46 AM
What a great twilight image, the only thing I can suggest is to tone down the brightest area in the sky to the right of St. Helens..it just seems to bright in comparison to the darker areas of the sky where the stars are showing. :toast:
Registered on January 28, 2010, 343 Posts, 2257 Comments
Comment posted by R.Bill Moser on October 2, 2012 at 12:26 PM
The foregroudn light is excellent. Well composed and processed. Excellent work. Like this a lot. :toast:
Registered on January 29, 2010, 285 Posts, 4281 Comments
Comment posted by Alex Noriega on October 2, 2012 at 2:39 PM
Zack, that's intentionally bright to emphasize the light source/direction. The key with these images is to keep the whole thing relatively dark to maintain the mood and twilight/night feel, but if everything is that dark it can just look underexposed. If there's one element in the image that's bright enough, it allows you to keep the image dark while avoiding that underexposed look. That's my view on it anyway. It's definitely not the most realistic interpretation, but I'm going for surreal/dramatic - not photojournalism. :smile:
Registered on May 19, 2012, 80 Posts, 195 Comments
Comment posted by Matt Anderson on October 3, 2012 at 8:29 PM
In the words of Joseph Kayne...


:toast: :toast: :toast:
Registered on September 6, 2007, 346 Posts, 2696 Comments
Comment posted by Abdullaziz Bin Ali on October 4, 2012 at 8:25 AM
Excellent one Alex
Everything is just WOW
Registered on May 31, 2009, 112 Posts, 1590 Comments
Comment posted by Max Waugh on October 13, 2012 at 2:37 PM
This is fantastic. Looks like a landscape from a far off moon. Between the clouds (which look like the fringes of a galaxy) and the stump and mountainside, I can definitely imagine this as an alien world. :)

Max
Registered on September 26, 2008, 428 Posts, 2329 Comments