Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Shattered
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Shattered

by Chris Moore

Gallery: LandscapePosted November 12, 2012288 views12 comments
Monochrome rendition of a five minute exposure capturing cloud streaks behind a gnarled Whitebark Pine, illuminated by the full moon outside Glacier.. This was taken about an hour before the photo I posted a few weeks ago, looking in the opposite direction. This image did not have near the color contrast from the previous so I made it black and white. D800, 14-24, 5 minutes around f/11. Thanks for any feedback.

Comments

12 comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on November 12, 2012 at 1:26 PM
Nice...i really like how you retained all the detail in the fg, and quite a cool subject! I'm a bit on the fence with all the negative space up top--while the 5 min exposure gave you some cloud movement i'm not sure it's enough to really justify all the sky. Maybe a darker sky (more contrast) would help some, not sure. But overall, i really like it. :smile:
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by Richie Graham on November 12, 2012 at 1:34 PM
For what it's worth, I like the negative space up top. I think it adds some drama by providing a sense of isolation for your subject, which seems to fit the sense of place.
Registered on September 2, 2011, 15 Posts, 33 Comments
Comment posted by Joseph Campisi on November 12, 2012 at 1:36 PM
I agree with Stan about the amount of sky Chris. Maybe a crop off the top and sides would make it tighter comp that would focus more on that wonderful bristlcone you found. other than that, I really like it as well!
Registered on November 24, 2008, 304 Posts, 3211 Comments
Comment posted by Youssef Ismail on November 12, 2012 at 2:35 PM
Really nice. The moon light did you a great favor producing a low contrast image. The streaking clouds add so much to this.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 474 Posts, 5555 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on November 12, 2012 at 3:27 PM
This looks great to me as is. I seem to enjoy the feel that I think all the sky adds to this. The cloud movement works really well here. This scene works wonderful as a b/w image. I like this a lot Chris. :smile:

Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Greenwood on November 12, 2012 at 9:29 PM
Both this one and the previous one are very nicely conceived and executed. My personal preference is the previous color composition, for its greater visual impact. But I like this B&W composition for its subtle drama also.
Registered on November 9, 2003, 229 Posts, 1523 Comments
Comment posted by scott lanz on November 12, 2012 at 9:40 PM
Well captured, Chris. Good job of visualizing the fine end result. Personally, I think I'd like to see a comp with the tree larger in the frame, but I like the clouds/sky at the top so I would not crop it.
Registered on November 14, 2003, 840 Posts, 12902 Comments
Comment posted by John Williams on November 13, 2012 at 12:29 AM
The drama where the branches interact with the sky works well. Thinking about the comments above, did you happen to try a closer comp with the camera low looking more up at the tree? I'm wondering if that might have reduced the foreground, and pitched the tree higher into that great sky. It also might have minimized those background branches; they distract just a tad. (I often think thoughts like this in the field, and when I move the camera to where I thought would be awesome I find it's a disaster :wink: .)
Registered on September 6, 2007, 221 Posts, 5985 Comments
Comment posted by Marsel van Oosten on November 13, 2012 at 4:50 AM
Awesome sky and I like the choice for BW. I like to amount of sky you included, but I think I'd prefer a slightly lower viewpoint and a position more to the left to get separation between the two main branches. There's a curved line near the right edge that seems to be the result of moon flare.
Registered on March 9, 2004, 285 Posts, 2277 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Moore on November 13, 2012 at 6:06 AM
Thanks for the comments. I was set up about five feet from the tree, and my tripod was completely collapsed so my camera was a couple inches off the ground pointed up. I did originally compose a lot closer to the tree, but backed up a couple feet because I thought this comp better conveyed the drama of emptiness and desolation I was going for. Thanks marcel: in retrospect I should have separated those branches. I totally missed that flare line :biggrin:
Registered on January 12, 2010, 84 Posts, 388 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on November 13, 2012 at 12:14 PM
Chris,

I think I prefer the color version as the sky, cloud motion and point of view I think work better. But that's not to say that this wasn't doesn't work, in fact it stands alone very well. And I think a good decision to go b&w here. The cloud motion works well for the subject and IMHO justifies the amount of space up top. Not sure if there's anything I can suggest except perhaps playing with the tone and contrast of the sky.

I like it.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Zack Clothier on November 13, 2012 at 8:49 PM
I really like the sky here, Chris, and think that it would lose most of its drama if it were cropped. Perhaps a different angle on the tree would have been better, but this is still nice.
Registered on January 28, 2010, 343 Posts, 2257 Comments