Hi again, everyone! Well, it took me a while to get back to my processing project on the Great Grey owls and owlets we photographed this past summer in the foothills of Alberta. I'm so honoured and humbled my last post of this guy was chosen as a weekly pick! Now I wish I had found the time to get this one processed and posted at the same time so I would know which you liked better!
So...which DO you like better? You can find the my earlier picture
here, cropped horizontal from full-frame width.
As you can see, seconds after taking the first image I posted, the light faded even more and I managed to catch a few frames with the last of some truly SWEET sunbeams spotlighting my this owl's face as it filtered through the forest.
This image is full-frame except for a very minor loss to rotation to tweak the vertical lines.
I'd love for you to check out the larger version and let me know which of these two images is the winner! As I mentioned before...I'm so taken with this little owl my subjectivity has flown the coop.

Never mind the fact I was FREAKING OUT as I squeezed the shutter on this frame, recognizing I had been blessed by one of those very, very rare moments when the light is not only near-magical, but landing on a captivating and cooperative subject and all the other variables were falling in my favour.
Field Notes:
Nikon D7000
Nikkor AF-S 300mm f/4 IF-ED
ISO 500
1/200sec @ f/4
-0.7 stops from Center-Weighted metered Manual
monopod with shaking hands as this light unfolded. ;)
Processing Notes:
Converted from 14Bit RAW using Phase One Capture One Pro 7 with almost no adjustments other than minor tweaking of colour balance and rotation
Minor tone and contrast tweaks in Nik Color Efex Pro 4 and Nik Viveza 2
Light noise reduction with Nik Dfine 2.0
Selective adjustments to tone background highlights slightly in PS CS5
Selective sharpening/masking
***Owl not called in, baited, or harassed in any way
Comments
19 commentsJerry - I can't disagree about trimming from the bottom, except I worked so hard to find a position in the forest that captured both the owlet and the moss hanging from the lower branch, I'm reticent to lose that for the second time!
Dave - this is completely natural and almost exactly as it looks in the RAW file. I just brought the brightness and contrast down a bit on the light hitting the tree in the background.
Probably my favourite aspect to this, and I was gushing about it to my kids beside me in the field, is how soft the transition is on the owl from light to shadow. The subtle highlights in the lower wing feathers really help as well, I think.
Thanks again for your comments of appreciation! I still welcome suggestions for improvement, though...like if you think I need to let go of my fascination with that moss on the lower branch already!
Excellent Work John
Ken Archer
Ray
May
For me there's no question - I prefer the vertical version. For me the strength of the vertical lines provided by the trees (and the hanging moss) tips the scale towards the vertical lines.
One thing I'm very torn on - the conflict between removing some of the bottom (because I feel the subject is too high in the frame and thus is somewhat out of balance) versus cutting out - or worse yet, clipping - that beautiful piece of mood-setting lichen. But at the end of the day I think I'd sacrifice the lichen to get the owl in a little less of an extreme position (i.e., I don't think the lichen is strong enough of a compositional element to properly counter the extreme positioning of the owl).
But that's just my 2 cents worth...cheers...
Brad