Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Modern Mandala WC #577
‹ PreviousWeekly Challenge GalleryNext ›

Modern Mandala WC #577

by John Clulow

Gallery: Weekly ChallengePosted March 27, 2013101 views7 comments
As I was walking down the street one day, a man came up to me and asked me what the time was on my watch, and I said; ‘Does anybody really know what time it is? I don’t. Does anybody really care about time? If so, I can’t imagine why: We’ve all got time enough to cry. I don’t care about time.’ – Robert Lamm: The Chicago Transit Authority, 1969

Well, Robert Lamm, I KNOW what time it is: It’s just after 5:41 pm CDT; almost 24 hours since I posted the last WC picture. We are limited to one image per forum in 24 yours. I fell asleep and lost 11 minutes between the first two. Not this time, baby!

So when it comes to this forum, Robert, I DO care what time it is, and I DON’T care if you can’t imagine why. You’re not even on NPN, as far as I know. In fact, I don’t know why I’m even talking to you!

By the way, Robert, whatever happened to your group? I used to love your albums when I was living in Philadelphia. Now you’re probably touring with the Doobie Brothers or something…. :wavey:

Pentax K100D Super, Tamron 90mm f/2.8 macro at f/20, 1/125s, flash, roughly 1:2 / 0.5X in-camera magnification ratio.

Comments

7 comments
Comment posted by Carolyn Derstine on March 28, 2013 at 8:19 PM
I wish you would have spent less time talking to Robert Lamm and more time explaining your image, John! :biggrin: Are you just wanting to prod our curiousity to do our own research? Anyway, that's what I did and this is one definition of mandala I found--"Any of various ritualistic geometric designs symbolic of the universe, used in Hinduism and Buddhism as an aid to meditation." Ok, is this image a part of a timepiece or an actual symbolic mandala? Whatever it is, it has fantastic design and texture. . .one could certainly "meditate" for a while on all the great details in this. :smile: Great macro but a bit less brightness may be helpful.
Registered on February 16, 2011, 610 Posts, 3684 Comments
Comment posted by John Clulow on March 28, 2013 at 8:44 PM
Thanks for your insightful comments Carolyn Derstine, as always....

less brightness may be helpful.

Now, if I had a nickle for ever time I hear that comment going through the public schools, I'd be a rich man. Not that I'm not rich by some standards.

You missed an essential element of a mandala, that being a circle. Now, with that bit of information added to your research, you can perhaps see more as to why this is a mandala for modern man. Or perhaps not.

Now, finally, the time I spent talking about Robert Lamm and Chicago (where I live) really all had to do with explaining the image as I had labeled it.

All of that aside, Carolyn Derstein, you're the only person who responded, as you often are to images I post here. And I just want you to know that I appreciate the effort. More than that, I want to also tell you how much I appreciate the artistry you exemplify on NPN in general and in this forum in particular.

Take care
Registered on November 1, 2012, 155 Posts, 1079 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Williams on March 29, 2013 at 12:32 PM
This was well timed for the theme this week John. I like that it is totally different from all of the other submissions, and you can spend a lot of time tracing the outlines and incredible design in this piece. It does seem a bit bright with the flash, maybe a longer exposure would bring out some of the rich golden colors without the brightness?
Registered on December 28, 2010, 636 Posts, 3499 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on March 30, 2013 at 9:40 AM
Spectacular look into at the watch innards! The golden glow and specular highlights from the flash are wonderful. Hard to call this "modern" with digital watches taking over. :wink:
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by Eirini Pajak on March 30, 2013 at 10:02 PM
Wow, the inside of that watch sure is beautiful! I actually don't mind the harsh gleams...it gives it a bit of a sparkle, a bit of a timeless quality :jump:
Registered on December 13, 2011, 216 Posts, 1671 Comments
Comment posted by RL Potts on March 30, 2013 at 11:45 PM
This is certainly an interesting image in many respects. All of the circles are elegant graphically. I just wish that they were a bit easier to distinguish from one another. I don't think brightness is the problem. I think sparseness of gradation and lack of contrast are to blame. The circle in the square is perfect. Peter, Paul, and Mary would approve.
Registered on November 24, 2003, 188 Posts, 985 Comments
Comment posted by John Clulow on March 31, 2013 at 9:11 AM
Thanks Mark, Ed, Eirini and Robert; for looking and commenting. We all see things differently. And just to clarify the intention; I found myself noticing the 24 hour restriction we have here on NPN; not to say this is in any way objectionable: I think it works very well. But now that I'm retired, and losing touch with the clock, I started also thinking about the sense of time more primitive, less modern men (and women) once had, and how that of modern man, post-industrial man, is so connected to the clock; the alarm clock, work attendance (apart from performance), the time of work breaks and lunch whistle, how this changes with "Daylight Savings Time", and what that's all about. When I was a kid, we spent most of summers on the farm with our grandparents; and we didn't need a watch. So those are some of my thoughts. Thanks for sharing yours.
Registered on November 1, 2012, 155 Posts, 1079 Comments