Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
The Touch of Light
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

The Touch of Light

by Sairam Sundaresan

Gallery: LandscapePosted June 11, 2013277 views14 comments
I was going through Ansel Adam's "Making of 40 Photographs" and I was wonderstruck with how much attention Ansel gave to developing the negative.The Zone System is such an amazing tool to have while developing, and it holds just as good in this digital era. Inspired by the imagery, and the creative process behind them, I attempted a black and white conversion of one of my seascapes that I had been wanting to process for quite some time. The digital darkroom truly gives us so much to choose from, if only we let ourselves be open to the choices. While I'm well and truly miles away from creating timeless work like Ansel, I'm grateful for being able to be inspired by his work.

Basic RAW processing, simple dodge and burn and some adjustment layers.

Tech : f/11 ISO 100 36s with a 10 stop ND filter.

Your comments and suggestions are welcome as always! :smile:

Comments

14 comments
Comment posted by David Edwards on June 11, 2013 at 7:11 AM
A very nice b&w Sairam. I like the range of tones you've done in processing. Perhaps the sand is a little too dark as I can't make out any detail there, but I do like the contrast with the water. The horizontal lines of the clouds seem to be blocking the flow of the comp somehow for me, or perhaps they are just a little too dominant.
Registered on December 6, 2008, 142 Posts, 2623 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Lowe on June 11, 2013 at 10:36 AM
Moody and mysterious and the light here is very striking. I really like this, Sairam. I could also see this working with a bit more shadow detail on the beach. Great drama here.

Ed
Registered on February 7, 2004, 414 Posts, 7115 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Chambers on June 11, 2013 at 12:32 PM
Beautiful. I'm on my work computer (laptop - uncalibrated), but I can see the beach quite well on it. I love the range of tones captured here. This is excellent IMO.
Registered on April 10, 2005, 753 Posts, 21216 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on June 11, 2013 at 1:14 PM
Wonderful use of light and contrast! My only suggestion might be a slight amount of luminance noise reduction on the sky if so desired.
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments
Comment posted by Phil Pogledich on June 11, 2013 at 1:34 PM
This is great! You have a good subject to explore in black and white and I like the results. Looks very good to me.
Registered on August 24, 2009, 123 Posts, 3099 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Breitkreuz on June 11, 2013 at 5:02 PM
As always, good to see some very open experimentation such as this image, Sairam. I do not work in B&W but do appreciate nice images such as this one here. I would think the noise in the sky is an item to work in for an improved scene. However, some nice work here regardless. :cool:
Registered on February 25, 2006, 525 Posts, 8448 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on June 11, 2013 at 5:08 PM
Sairam,

And in the honor of Adams, you've done this beautiful justice. In fact I could envision your processing here just as if it might have been something that came out of his darkroom. Excellent work here.

Along the lines of Mark's comments, but hard to tell at this size, is that the clouds seem a little noisy - or is that grainy? And if there is any detail at all that shows up in print, I'd say this looks great. Really like the contrast and tonal range.

You didn't mention, but is this Drakes beach/bay out at Point Reyes? Sure looks like it.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Barry Vangrov on June 11, 2013 at 5:35 PM
The sky is great - pure Ansel. The shadows need opened up some to show more detail and you've come very close to blowing out the highlights where the sun strikes the water. Check the detail in the RAW file and burn it in so it's not quite as harsh. :smile:
Registered on September 1, 2009, 148 Posts, 749 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on June 11, 2013 at 6:49 PM
Sairam, I'm very much enjoying this image! The longer I look at it the more it draws me in. I like the mood and I think you did a great job on the comp. :smile:

Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by Sairam Sundaresan on June 11, 2013 at 9:09 PM
Wow, thanks for all the comments guys! :smile:

David, it's kind of weird because on my laptop at home ( a macbook), I can see detail in the sand pretty well. The same image when viewed on my work computer, a PC shows a darker image. I need to find a way to account for this brightness difference!

Thanks Ed, I guess a few people have mentioned lack of detail in the sand. Guess I need to look into it.

Thanks Bill, I guess there is some discrepancy across displays. Any idea of how to account for it?

Thanks Mark. I intentionally added a bit of grain to the image for aesthetics, but I guess the compression produced some artifacts and it looks a bit noisy. I'll fix that in a repost. :wink:

Thanks very much Phil, I'm glad you like it!

Thanks Paul, like I said above, the added grain and the compression I had to do to post it here has rather made it less like grain and more like noise. Will fix it :smile:

Lon, those are some very kind words! Thank you. Yes, this is Drake's beach at Point Reyes. It was a cloudy evening with occasional moments where the sun shone through and spotlit these rocks. As for the noise, I guess added grain + compression = nasty noise :wink:

Thanks Barry, glad you like it. I checked the histogram after processing, and there was no clipping on the highlights. I intentionally dodged the highlights there to draw the eye. Also if you see the larger version ( I will post one soon), you'll be able to see detail there, although rather faintly, since the original RAW didn't have too much to start with :smile:

Thanks very much Nick! :smile:
Registered on March 14, 2013, 100 Posts, 643 Comments
Comment posted by Buck Ward on June 11, 2013 at 10:00 PM
Hi Sairam

The beach looks dark on my monitor, too. I can see some detail, but I think the image wouldn't suffer if it were a little lighter.

There generally is no way to account for differences among other peoples' monitors. They are all different.

A problem does arise when you make a print. Prints tend to be darker than what we see on our monitor. This can be especially detrimental to black and white. I don't print my own; I have them professionally printed - my printer's monitor is calibrated to his printer and paper, so it is WYSIWYG. I plan to have some large black and white prints made soon and I will review them on his monitor, and have him make suitable adjustments before printing. Because prints tend to be darker, I think it's probably a good practice to err on the side of making shadows a little lighter.

By the way, I have Adams book too. I greatly admire his work.
Registered on December 8, 2003, 96 Posts, 1917 Comments
Comment posted by Sairam Sundaresan on June 12, 2013 at 1:30 AM
Thanks for the info Buck, yes erring on the lighter side of shadows seems to be the way to go. I've had a number of images here where members have commented that the shadows were too dark. :smile:

I love the book!
Registered on March 14, 2013, 100 Posts, 643 Comments
Comment posted by Harley Goldman on June 12, 2013 at 5:18 PM
I am really liking the bold contrast. The beach shadows are not too dark for my tastes or lacking detail. Very well done!
Registered on November 19, 2003, 586 Posts, 11271 Comments
Comment posted by Sairam Sundaresan on June 12, 2013 at 6:09 PM
Thanks Harley! I'm glad you like it! :smile:
Registered on March 14, 2013, 100 Posts, 643 Comments