Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Varanger coast
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Varanger coast

by Chris Stenger

Gallery: LandscapePosted August 1, 2013262 views8 comments
I took this picture during my recent spring trip to northern Scandinavia. The image shows the coast of the Varanger peninsula. In June the sun doesn't set at this location. Around midnight it gets a bit cooler though, resulting in the development of some fog (background of the image).
Mamiya 645DF with Leaf back
35 mm
ISO 80, 1/15 sec, f/14

Comments

8 comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on August 1, 2013 at 5:27 PM
Chris,

Wonderful image. I really like the composition and the midnight light is just beautiful. The ripples/patterns in the water have a gentle curve that leads the eye around and then up in to the landscape, mountains and encroaching fog. A very nicely crafted image.

To me, this seems a tad over sharpened, or perhaps over USM'd, if that's a term. I think even in the larger view (I'm guessing you did the single 1200px upload?) Another possibility is jpg compression, but the sand at the bottom looks very good. Anyway, minor observation and it could just be me.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Matt Anderson on August 1, 2013 at 9:53 PM
Patterns, layering, and texture. It all works well.
Registered on September 6, 2007, 346 Posts, 2696 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Stenger on August 2, 2013 at 2:36 AM
Lon, thanks for your comments. I would like to comment on the oversharpening tht you notice. The oversharpening that you notice is something that I have been struggling with as well. Actually the image was not at all sharpened and apparently it's a Photoshop issue that develops when you cut back the resolution. The image was taken with a digital back, is 9300 pixels wide and due to the lack of an anti-aliasing filter is extremely sharp by itself. Converting the resolution in Photoshop from the original 9300 to the NPN resolution of 1200 pixels results in the effect that you notice. I tried a few tricks, but particularly in images with good contrast I always end up with this effect. Perhaps I should blur the image a bit after the conversion to 1200 pixels.
Registered on May 9, 2013, 27 Posts, 163 Comments
Comment posted by Roel Wijtmans on August 2, 2013 at 10:47 AM
Very nice indeed! I like the ripples a lot.
Registered on September 30, 2012, 116 Posts, 2257 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on August 2, 2013 at 12:11 PM
Chris,

Thanks for the additional info. If you're simply resizing from 9300 to 1200 with no other sharpening steps, then it makes sense what we're seeing here. There are many techniques of course and there are even some actions developed by members here on NPN. I used Tony Kuyper's web sharpening action which comes as part of his package that includes the Luminosity masks, which I highly recommend if you're not already familiar. Although I have not personally tried, you can get Andreas Resch's sharpening action for free. It's also highly recommended by others.

Then there is the original, basic web sharpening technique put out by Marc Adamus a number of years ago. It basically goes like this:
1. Image>Image size to 1.67X your final desired size. for example, if your final size is 1200px, then do Image>size to approx 2,000px (from your 9300) I use the default Bicubic
2. Run the "sharpen" filter TWICE (Filter>sharpen>sharpen)
3. Complete the Image>Image Size to 1200px
Note: this of course is image dependent; experiment with the number of sharpening steps (usually 2, but sometimes 1 works, and sometimes you can even do 3!) Also, some might prefer to run in LAB. And of course with any sharpening technique, there are things like plain old blue sky or some continuous tone/color areas that shouldn't be sharpened, so masking those areas out might be recommended.

I'd give one of those options a try. BTW, the image quality isn't that bad, but enough that I noticed and thought to comment.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Catherine Reilly on August 3, 2013 at 5:11 AM
My goodness! This image captivates me! The quality of light is special, and that, combined with the elements of fog and water make this look ethereal. My focus longs for the water and the background, so I'd personally like to see a little less of the fg dark beach. Other than that, I'd like to sit and look at this for a long time.
Registered on August 16, 2006, 603 Posts, 9192 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Stenger on August 3, 2013 at 6:28 AM
Thanks to all of you for the comments.

Catherine, concerning the dark beach in the foreground the following. I always like to have my subject a bit of space and therefore I hardly ever crop my images such that only the main subject is visible. In my opinion having the dark foreground beach in the image gives more depth and concentrates the eye on the lighter parts in the middle section. Of course all this is personal preference and interpretation. Thanks for your comments.

Lon, thanks for the advice and I tried several of your suggestions. The Marc Adamus technique didn't give any improvement, but the Andreas Resch technique works fine. I have therefore added a version resized to 720 px with the Andreas Resch technique. In my opinion, although subtle, it's an improvement. By the way the original file was not resized from 9300 to 1200 pixels in one step. I used a technique very similar to the Marc Adamus technique but as said above this didn't give the best result. Thanks again for your comments and help.
Registered on May 9, 2013, 27 Posts, 163 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on August 3, 2013 at 3:29 PM
Chris, A definite improvement. Not "crunchy" now and I wouldn't make a comment on sharpness for the web with this version. Thanks for taking the time.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments