Gallery: WildlifePosted March 10, 2014164 views8 comments
This young Gnu, was apparently lost or left behind during the madness of the calving season in Southern Serengeti.
Unfortunately it raised its head at the wrong time!
EOS 1DX
200-400mm F4 at 280 mm
F 6.3
ISO 800
1/4000
Comments
8 comments
Comment posted by Ralph Kerr on March 10, 2014 at 6:17 AM
Quite a photo, Ken. Looks like you had harsh mid day light, which you handled well, although it appears the Chetah color is a bit washed out. I note a bit of action here in the dust stirred up by the Gnu's hind feet in what is probably its last struggles in the not so pretty part of nature. At the same time the Chetah has to eat. I am a bit curious why there is no shadow under the Chetah while there is a definite shadow cast by the Gnu. Overall, a great photo IMO.
Registered on January 30, 2007, 369 Posts, 852 Comments
Comment posted by Martin Dunn on March 10, 2014 at 7:07 AM
Welcome back Ken. I trust Ruaha was excellent.
For me this is not one of your best shots and does not really reflect what must have been an exciting moment on safari.
The colours are a bit washed out and I think we need a slightly more frontal pov, or perhaps a head turn.
Registered on February 20, 2013, 198 Posts, 1011 Comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on March 10, 2014 at 7:27 AM
Good question about the shadow. This had to be late morning or early afternoon. I see part of the shadow of the hindquarters and the shadow of the right foreleg on the left, but nothing of the body? I'm sure there is an explanation. Perhaps it is obscured behind the raised clump of grass in the middle and the dust kicked up by the gnu.
Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Cloran on March 10, 2014 at 12:39 PM
Solid capture and a strong nature story. This looks like almost noon lighting, hence the positioning of the shadow. Looking closely at the larger version I believe Phil hit the nail on the head. I seem to see the tracings of the shadow coming out from behind the clump of grass and moving over to the gnu's back foot. The kicked up dust is obscuring it. The lighting isn't going to help the colors any, but have you tried shifting over to the Landscape profile for the camera in LR or ACR? I find that it often brings back the natural coloration in fur when the lighting is flat.
Registered on April 6, 2004, 119 Posts, 1989 Comments
Comment posted by Morkel Erasmus on March 10, 2014 at 3:22 PM
Certainly exciting to see this, Ken. Agree with Martin on his assessment - do you have any of the "Snatch"?
Registered on March 22, 2011, 385 Posts, 2068 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Watkins on March 11, 2014 at 2:25 AM
I agree with the light comments, it was indeed very harsh. This is always a problem close to the equator where the sun is mostly overhead.
I think I need to revisit this one.
I was a bit far away for the "snatch" and the vehicle was moving, I have yet to have a good look at these, but unlikely to be OK?
Registered on December 15, 2010, 1537 Posts, 4877 Comments
Comment posted by James Blue on March 11, 2014 at 4:50 AM
Hey Ken, glad to see you got in a a chase or two. It's always a dilemma: keep the vehicle moving for a prime position - or shoot from where you are. Nice capture of what I know to be a very cool experience. Jim
Registered on June 16, 2013, 16 Posts, 144 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on March 11, 2014 at 11:15 AM
The encounter would be special and I agree with other observations about light and understand fully the constraints of bright over-head sunlight. I think this would have been much stronger with a simple head turn.
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comments
8 commentsFor me this is not one of your best shots and does not really reflect what must have been an exciting moment on safari.
The colours are a bit washed out and I think we need a slightly more frontal pov, or perhaps a head turn.
I think I need to revisit this one.
I was a bit far away for the "snatch" and the vehicle was moving, I have yet to have a good look at these, but unlikely to be OK?