Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
How The Sky Looked (Eclipse)
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

How The Sky Looked (Eclipse)

by Paul DeCesare

Gallery: LandscapePosted April 17, 2014511 views6 comments
I do have 3 hours' worth of close eclipse images from Monday night that I shot for a research need, but this image is one that I carefully "processed" to show what the sky looked like out there that night.

PLEASE view it larger!

I drove up to Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff and planted myself in this circular pulloff right at the end of the short road that leads to the telescopes, so I knew I was in a good spot, 7,000 feet and zero light pollution. Once the moon was in full eclipse it was a full 8 stops lower in luminance which allowed all of the stars to come out like there was no moon that night. It was quite surreal to see, so I wanted to pull back and try to recreate a section as it was that night. This dual-exposure image is about as close as I can get, although the moon was probably a bit dimmer than this backlit version you are viewing.

I shot this at 115mm (on a FF sensor), the sky at 4.0 sec, f/2.8, ISO 2500, and then the moon shot at1/4 sec, f4.5, ISO 400. Both were at daylight WB although I feel the larger images of the moon I got with a 300mm lens look most accurate at 4200K. A simple mask in Photoshop revealed the properly exposed moon versus the heavens. I think I pushed it shooting 4.0 seconds at 115mm, the star trails are beginning to form, but I was at end-of-limit for decent low-noise and proper exposure.

BTW, The brightest object in the TR corner is Mars. And the brightest star and the 4 o'clock position near the moon is Spica, which you can see in Keith Bauer's excellent multi-exposure in this gallery.

Comments

6 comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on April 17, 2014 at 9:50 AM
A beautifully correct representation of the sky that night. At least it was the same where I saw it here in Colorado. It was great to have such a clear night for viewing it. This is just like being there, Paul. Well done.
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments
Comment posted by SandyRichardsBrown on April 17, 2014 at 12:25 PM
Excellent - the large version is perfect.
Great work!

Sandy
Registered on November 24, 2003, 3937 Posts, 12909 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Teller on April 17, 2014 at 6:39 PM
I think this image gives you a sense of place and the big picture. There are a lot of fine image of the moon close up, but I like putting the moon in its environment.
Registered on August 23, 2010, 1162 Posts, 6692 Comments
Comment posted by Grant Collier on April 18, 2014 at 8:07 PM
I like how you included Mars in this shot. It turns out that the temperature of light from the moon is actually about 4150K. Although it's just reflected sunlight, the moon isn't perfectly white, so the light reflected off it is a little cooler. So I think you nailed it in trying to get an accurate portrayal.
Registered on July 29, 2005, 73 Posts, 430 Comments
Comment posted by Paul DeCesare on April 19, 2014 at 2:17 AM
the temperature of light from the moon is actually about 4150K

Thank you for confirming that!

And I appreciate the comments from everyone. It's hard not to post the big frame-filling moon but I wanted to take a little risk. :wink:
Registered on August 31, 2007, 29 Posts, 202 Comments
Comment posted by Paul DeCesare on April 19, 2014 at 2:24 AM
OK FINE, here's a big one! Crop from a 300mm lens actually, lol.
Registered on August 31, 2007, 29 Posts, 202 Comments