Gallery: LandscapePosted April 24, 2014182 views7 comments
The night sky explodes with stars on the summit of Mauna Kea in Hawaii. The air up there is some of the clearest in the world, and is an astronomer's dream.
Can you see the Big Dipper?
Comments
7 comments
Comment posted by Alan LaFaver on April 24, 2014 at 3:22 PM
Nice shot of what I can only imagine as an indescribably beautiful place. Hope to make it there one day.
For me, would like to see the horizon slightly higher to see a bit more landscape.
A bigger version might convince me otherwise. Having a hard time with grasping the scale on my 24" monitor.
Shot looks great though. Capture of the clouds contrasted with night sky is sweet.
Would love to hear your ideas on the shot and what you like about it.
Also, would like to see the techs.
Registered on February 28, 2014, 18 Posts, 147 Comments
Comment posted by Aaron Feinberg on April 24, 2014 at 4:19 PM
But you cant feel how cold it was!! :P
Registered on October 26, 2009, 399 Posts, 2789 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel Rappaport on April 24, 2014 at 9:36 PM
Beautifully done transition between the mountain, clouds and sky. Yes the dipper is there and Polaris too? Petty low lying compared to what you'd see in Minnesota!
Registered on September 9, 2009, 294 Posts, 2006 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Lowe on April 24, 2014 at 11:27 PM
Beautifully done, Kory. I like the transition from the mountain to the clouds and culminating the gradient of blue in the night time sky. My only suggestion; and this is just a personal preference; would be to see the landscape just a touch darker as it looks a bit light in relationship to the night sky. Just a thought.
Ed
Registered on February 7, 2004, 414 Posts, 7115 Comments
Comment posted by John Williams on April 25, 2014 at 12:02 AM
Nice. What are you shooting with? I played with night skies for the first time recently with the 7100; much better than the 80, but still some definite noise issues. I too would darken the land a bit, but this really has a cosmos feel.
Registered on September 6, 2007, 221 Posts, 5985 Comments
Comment posted by Genny K. on April 27, 2014 at 8:04 PM
Neat. Add me to the list of those wanting to see the tech numbers. I really like the transition from dark blue to black in the sky. To me, that's the key focal point of this image. I bet this would look really nice on a big print.
Yeah,we were up there about 20+ years ago, really cool place, especially in the early morning!!
Registered on June 5, 2006, 132 Posts, 2001 Comments
Comment posted by Kory Lidstrom on April 28, 2014 at 2:03 PM
Hey all, thanks for the comments. Sorry for the late response.
The tech is: 20 seconds at f/2.8, 16mm, ISO 3200 Shot with a 5DM2 and 16-35mm lens.
Regarding the comp, I hear you on adding more foreground, but there simply isn't any to add. If I pan any lower, you start to see the hillside leading up to my viewing spot, and it just isn't interesting and really hampers the comp.
As for the lightness of the foreground, that was a personal choice. I wasn't going for reality as much as spaci-ness. If I darken the foreground, it loses detail and starts to look "meh".
Registered on November 19, 2008, 49 Posts, 1035 Comments
Comments
7 commentsFor me, would like to see the horizon slightly higher to see a bit more landscape.
A bigger version might convince me otherwise. Having a hard time with grasping the scale on my 24" monitor.
Shot looks great though. Capture of the clouds contrasted with night sky is sweet.
Would love to hear your ideas on the shot and what you like about it.
Also, would like to see the techs.
Ed
Yeah,we were up there about 20+ years ago, really cool place, especially in the early morning!!
The tech is: 20 seconds at f/2.8, 16mm, ISO 3200 Shot with a 5DM2 and 16-35mm lens.
Regarding the comp, I hear you on adding more foreground, but there simply isn't any to add. If I pan any lower, you start to see the hillside leading up to my viewing spot, and it just isn't interesting and really hampers the comp.
As for the lightness of the foreground, that was a personal choice. I wasn't going for reality as much as spaci-ness.