Under the falls.

Gallery: LandscapePosted November 5, 2014120 views7 comments

George W. Childs State Park, Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area, PA

Raw file processed in LR5, with TK resize/sharpening for web.
Canon T3i, 1/15 s, f/9, ISO 400, EF 70-200 mm f/2.8 @ 160 mm, CPL.

Please view the large image!

Seeking any and all advice and comments. Thanks in advance.

Comments

7 comments

Comment posted by Pat Sampson on November 5, 2014 at 9:58 AM

The thumbnail doesn't do this justice Ron. Love the detail and the intimate point of view. Strong comp as well. I like this one a lot.

pat

Registered on May 19, 2007, 953 Posts, 15989 Comments

Comment posted by Nick Bristol on November 5, 2014 at 12:02 PM

Ronald, I agree the thumbnail and even the 720 version doesn't do this justice. The large version is really cool to look at. I like the shutter speed and the details in the grass are very nice!

Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI

Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments

Comment posted by Holger Streu on November 5, 2014 at 1:47 PM

Agree, lots of detail.
What Is the main subject? I am curious of what it would look like if the bottom, top or right side had been shown more.
The Water Gap PA area has some very beautiful, interesting waterfalls.

Registered on September 19, 2011, 50 Posts, 113 Comments

Comment posted by Ryan Shain on November 5, 2014 at 6:40 PM

Definitely need to view this a bit larger to really appreciate the image. The details in the vegetation and colors are beautiful to look at.

Registered on February 20, 2007, 226 Posts, 4571 Comments

Comment posted by Ed Lowe on November 5, 2014 at 8:31 PM

Beautiful details, particularly in the large version, Ronald. I also like your SS choice for this intimate scene. I am curious, do you have any comps with a bit more water on the right side? I think that would also work.

Ed

Registered on February 7, 2004, 414 Posts, 7115 Comments

Comment posted by Bill Reid on November 5, 2014 at 10:03 PM

Very nice details and flow in the large version Ronald. I agree with Ed that a bit more on the right would be nice but nice as is.

Registered on January 27, 2013, 65 Posts, 2460 Comments

Comment posted by Ronald Murphy on November 6, 2014 at 8:30 AM

Ed, I have no other views of this. This is what I visualized and, apparently, by God I stuck with it.

Registered on March 13, 2012, 279 Posts, 975 Comments