Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
The Cute Trio
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

The Cute Trio

by Brad Hill

Gallery: WildlifePosted December 29, 2014607 views19 comments
The Cute Trio

I don't know of anyone who doesn't find young animals cute. Indeed, some argue that the factors that help to define "cute" (including disproportionately big eyes and short "near-pug" noses) are part of an evolutionary strategy to reduce aggression against young, vulnerable animals - both from conspecifics as well as from members of other species (and the reality of natural cross-species adoptions is at least consistent with this argument). So...when these three grizzly cubs-of-the-year chose to give us this unforgettable pose in a remote inlet in the Great Bear Rainforest well...it was a wildlife photographers dream come true! I was with a group of photographers at the time and it was interesting that evening to compare the different approaches everyone took at the time (and I mean beyond the "crap, mine's out of focus" comments!). I had an 80-400mm lens in my hands at the time and chose to back off (to 260mm) and capture the moment as what I think of as an "enviroscape" where the subjects are shown within enough of the environment in which they live to give the image context (as opposed to an "animalscape" where the subjects are even smaller in the frame and shown within a much broader landscape).

Those who have been with me in the field know that I'm pretty obsessed with Depth-of-Field (DoF) issues when I'm shooting wildlife. I personally consider DoF as the most under-appreciated of the creative elements of wildlife photography (and it's one of the main reasons I shoot with high-speed super-telephotos - such as the 400mm f2.8E VR - a lot of the time...i.e., so that I can maximize the range of apertures and DoF options available to me). To me getting the DoF just right (for any given scene) is a fascinating exercise in problem-solving and optimization of variables. When you start dealing with two or more subjects your soft-drive's (i.e., your brain's) DoF optimization algorithm must shift - and in most cases the primary consideration becomes finding enough DoF to get the critical regions of all your subjects in focus. This can mean that another variable - which is often separating your subjects from the background through choosing the right aperture - has to be compromised. But this was one of those rare multiple-subject scenes where the subjects aligned themselves almost perfectly along the same focal plane (thanks little fuzz dudes!) AND the distance between them and the background was sufficient that I was able to render the subjects AND the background just the way I wanted. It isn't often this happens, especially with 3 hyperactive grizzly cubs!

Subject: Trio of Grizzly (Ursus arctos) cubs posing
Location: Great Bear Rainforest, BC, Canada
Camera: Nikon D4
Lens: Nikkor AF-S 80-400mm VR @ 260mm. Hand-held from floating zodiac. VR on and in "Active" mode.
Exposure: 1/320s @ f6.3; ISO 1800. -0.3 stop compensation from matrix-metered exposure setting.
Crop: Minor - this is about 90% of the full-framed image

More details about the image - including a 2400-pixel version of the image - can be found here on my website:

http://www.naturalart.ca/galleries/latest/.

Comments and critiques welcomed - probably best to view the larger version prior to doing so (or better yet the 2400 pixel version on my website).

NOTE: In the spirit of full disclosure (which is important to me) - in my opinion this image crosses the line from simple digital processing and/or digital correction to digital manipulation. In the original capture there was a stout stick running from the log and up to the face of the cub on the left side of the image. It was removed during post-processing.

Cheers...

Brad

Comments

19 comments
Comment posted by Max Waugh on December 29, 2014 at 2:33 PM
Brad, I've got mixed feelings about this. It's obviously an excellent representation of the bears' coastal habitat, and the way they lined up for you (along the same focal plane, no less) is great.

From an aesthetic standpoint, I struggle with the potentially beautiful top half and a messy, slightly ugly foreground. Visually, the top and bottom are discordant to an extent... and I find myself wondering if you got any compositions that emphasize the cubs more against that lovely misty treed background (or if you'd consider chopping off much of the grass and mud beneath the log). The more I look at it, I think had the background been solid green, the heavy brown foreground might have worked much better as a solid base for this composition, but with those light clouds peeking through I feel the difference in tonality causes the two halves to tug at each other a bit too much.

Don't know if any of that made sense, but that was my initial reaction upon viewing.

Max
Registered on September 26, 2008, 428 Posts, 2329 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on December 29, 2014 at 2:55 PM
Hey Max,

Thanks for the honest feedback. Here's an image shot a few moments earlier that addresses most of your issues (and previously posted here):

Congestion @ the On-ramp

It's somewhat amusing to me that a number of commenters on that shot wanted to see more below, including the river below ("I might have even gone wider or arranged it so one could see the River the bear was hesitant to cross"). Real different strokes thing!

In terms of the "messy, slightly ugly foreground" - hey...it's what it was, and in my view the foreground shows what it's like on tide-dominated coastal estuaries. And I actually don't perceive it as messy or ugly...to me it adds visual interest. I disagree with your comments on the background (re: you wanting solid green vs. the clouds), but your view is important and it will be interesting to see what others think! Feedback is always interesting and valuable.

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by William Bickle on December 29, 2014 at 3:54 PM
Hello Brad

Gotta love those little guys! An intersesting view from below their perch.

Bill

Registered on June 13, 2011, 183 Posts, 1702 Comments
Comment posted by Max Waugh on December 29, 2014 at 4:18 PM
Thanks for linking back to the previous post, Brad. I do prefer that composition (more of the treed background) for this subject. In both cases I'm still glad you didn't zoom all the way in on the cubs, as the environment is an important component in both scenes.

As for the foreground, I hope the mud/matted grass lovers don't hate me for what I said. :wink: As you said, it is what it is, and it's certainly representative of the environment in which these cubs are living, exploring and foraging. If anything, it's more of a harsh texture contrast--mud, grass, rugged lines--compared to the smoothness that lies behind the subject. One thing that works well in the foreground's favor (IMO) is that the warm tones do match the cubs quite well. If anything I think that helps "bring them forward" and separate them from the background even more.

Max
Registered on September 26, 2008, 428 Posts, 2329 Comments
Comment posted by Allen Brooks on December 29, 2014 at 5:06 PM
Cute, no question about that. Wonderful pose and I like the fog and trees behind the cubs which I think adds a lot to the scene. On the other hand, the foreground doesn't do much for me and takes up about half of the shot. For me, cropping about 1/2 inch below the fallen log makes for a more intimate shot of the cubs
Registered on July 27, 2011, 262 Posts, 2597 Comments
Comment posted by Clinton Bauder on December 29, 2014 at 7:07 PM
I greatly prefer this version to the linked-to image with less foreground mud and less of the cloud cover. To me the trees against the mist really make the image and the mud turns the bear's perch into a story (they are trying to cross without getting too dirty). Really cool photo. :toast:

Clinton
Registered on December 8, 2009, 31 Posts, 231 Comments
Comment posted by Alberto Patiño on December 29, 2014 at 7:09 PM
I would agree with Allen's comment regarding cropping so as to increase the attention on the 3 very cute cubs. I find the sliver of water and the chunks of grass at the very bottom a bit distracting, I would perhaps crop so that none of this is visible, and an equivalent amount off the left, so as to keep the same overall proportions. I like the very realistic colors and tones very much, and I don't see the out of focus trees as being a problem.
Registered on December 2, 2014, 278 Posts, 1736 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Sandor on December 29, 2014 at 8:05 PM
Brad: like everything thing about it except for the sliver of water at the bottom, which doesn't add anything to the composition. Once that's gone, then it would appear that a bit more should be taken off the left side. Richard
Registered on January 12, 2014, 453 Posts, 1625 Comments
Comment posted by Barb Pflaum on December 29, 2014 at 9:41 PM
Wonderful image of those cute little cubs! The bg is excellent and I think the foreground is fine. My first thought was to crop out the sliver of water at the bottom, but looking at it again and thinking about the story it tells, I would leave the image exactly as posted.
Registered on January 14, 2009, 316 Posts, 2724 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on December 29, 2014 at 10:06 PM
My very first reaction was I predict this will be one of your strongest sellers. That said, my second reaction was that the bright band at the bottom was a distraction, not as a busy detail, but as an eye puller. I would make the crop to eliminate the water and brightest edge of mud, leaving a truly top shelf image.
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by John Launstein on December 30, 2014 at 1:07 AM
That, is pretty insane, Brad! Epic poses, incredible background, great comp...it's a triple threat in more ways than one! I think I'm going to stick with just a "fantastic image" on this comment, simply because I don't know what side of the fence I'm on in the debate above re less foreground or as presented, but honestly I generally feel the posting photographer probably made the decisions they did for really good reasons, and that's almost always true with you in particular.

Seriously, the looks you're getting from these three, and their relative poses, are just mind-blowing. "Wildlife photographer's dream come true!" to say the least! :cool:
Registered on April 5, 2011, 223 Posts, 1193 Comments
Comment posted by Kurt Bowman on December 30, 2014 at 10:43 AM
Brad, I have a couple of things for you on this one.
First, I started laughing when I read your comments about how important DOF is. not because I think that is a joke, but instead...before reading your comments my thoughts when viewing this were; Brad really seems to pay a lot of attention to his DOF. I don't think he could have chosen one more perfect for this scene. Seriously, that was what I was thinking. Sort of funny.
Second, on the first post of this, my comments stated, this has me wondering what they are doing up there on the log. Now, this image tells me more of the story. They were crossing a river. Because of this, I like the fact the river is included in the image from a story perspective. Yes maybe it pulls my eye a little, but it also is an important part of the story and because of this, I would keep it in the frame.
Registered on June 19, 2008, 1005 Posts, 8028 Comments
Comment posted by Ingrid Vekemans on December 30, 2014 at 10:43 AM
First of all: great shot of the little bear trio looking straight at you - very cute and a lovely scene. My first thought was that there was just too much going on in the foreground and I found it distracting. Having said that, when I crop it off in my mind…it just doesn't appeal as much as the original as posted does! So I would leave it as is - ideally I might have even put in a tad more water in the FG and maybe even a bit more of that beautiful BG. All in all a great shot!
Grt, Ingrid. :toast:
Registered on August 2, 2010, 138 Posts, 780 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Cordes on December 30, 2014 at 7:58 PM
Brad, great shot. I have been to the Great Bear Rain Forrest and find this image depicts the area well. The three little ones expression and interaction is wonderful. FWIW removing the stick is totally OK with me. Congrats on this super image.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 451 Posts, 3366 Comments
Comment posted by Kathy Barnhart on December 31, 2014 at 4:49 PM
After reading all the comments and looking at the other image, I think this one is just right! Tells the story, the cubs are just too cute, looking right at you, and the environment is well displayed. As always, your bear images are remarkable!
Registered on November 11, 2011, 404 Posts, 1639 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on January 3, 2015 at 7:40 AM
Hey all,

Thanks for the great feedback on this shot. Thanks in particular to those who took a "position" on this shot and took the time to explain their rationale for having that position. In my view that's EXACTLY what these image critiquing galleries are about and what makes them so valuable. Overall I think this was a great exercise in examining alternate viewpoints and gave a lot of viewers pause for thought.

Regarding the image itself: As John Launstein pointed out, I DID have reasons for composing and presenting this shot as I did and of course I considered the issue of whether the foreground would distract or add to the shot. In the end I decided that - at least for me - it helped complete the visual story and was essential. Personally I think even cropping out a LITTLE off the bottom (and removing the water) would be a mistake - while even tho' they don't occupy a lot of the frame, the cubs dominate this composition and I highly doubt ANYONE's eyes went to the water before the cubs (I have no doubt the eye would have got to the water when exploring the image AFTER looking at the cubs, but that's kinda the point!). On that note, I think cropping tighter and/or removing a bunch of foreground to "better emphasize the cubs" is totally unnecessary in this shot...they're pretty dominant already. So this will be the way I continue to present the shot moving forward...

Thanks again for all the feedback - and for taking time to go beyond those "nice- to-hear-but-not-too-useful" one line critiques! :wink:

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on January 3, 2015 at 4:32 PM
Sweet image all the way around (and in all senses of the word "sweet") I really love the look of the immediate habitat (river/bank/tree) and the overall habitat (mountains/fog) which helps create a sense of place.
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Morkel Erasmus on January 4, 2015 at 4:20 PM
Loved reading your musings here Brad.
Great image all round in my books (though I enjoyed the discussion between you and Max up top)
Registered on March 22, 2011, 385 Posts, 2068 Comments
Comment posted by Jenaya Launstein on January 20, 2015 at 2:47 AM
Absolutely love this one, Brad! The surrounding environment adds to the image in my opinion. I really like the "animal-scape" feel here. I can see no sign of you removing the stick. It's nice to have them all looking at you!
Registered on February 8, 2011, 254 Posts, 1302 Comments