Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Ghosts in the Forest + repost
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Ghosts in the Forest + repost

by Ed Lowe

Gallery: LandscapePosted February 28, 2016202 views20 comments
Nikon D700
Nikon 80-200 @ 200
f 16 @ 2.5 sec
ISO 200
tripod & cable release
Acadia NP, ME

I am a little out of my comfort zone on this one so I thought I would put it out there and see what everyone thought. When I shot this I had thought about converting to a B&W as there was really not much color in the scene. The evergreens on the edge of the woods were all dead; hence the title. I am not sure why they died, but the standing water and marsh I am sure had something to do with it.

As always thanks for taking a look and leaving a comment or suggestion.

Ed
 

Comments

20 comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on February 28, 2016 at 4:44 PM
Ed, This certainly does have a ghostly look / feel about it. A combination of the dead trees and your b&w processing. It's kind of like you can see into the forest and yet the forest isn't there...or something like that. Kind of transparent I guess. Cool image and perfect title. Very cool.

Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by Roger Kirchen on February 28, 2016 at 6:30 PM
I like the delicate, filigrane appearance.  Once sees through the forest, or at least well into it.  And yet at the same time, it seems impenetrable.
Registered on March 6, 2011, 95 Posts, 847 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on February 28, 2016 at 8:53 PM
Ed,

Right up my alley!  These type scenes are perfect for b&w and kudos for seeing that up front.  It's one thing to convert to b&w, just to convert and see what it looks like (we've all done it...,) but it's another thing to recognize a scene for it's b&w qualities before pressing the shutter.

The back story is important here because otherwise I would wonder why the evergreen isn't a darker (green) tone.  And regardless of the information, this does have a ghost-like and mysterious edge to this.

I have two thoughts on the critique.  First, I'm wondering if this might be improved, in terms of impact, if you cropped some off the bottom to eliminate the foreground bush tops or grasses.  Nothing but trees simplifies this somewhat complex scene.  The other suggestion is playing around more with contrasts and exposure.  If you were looking for a more high-key presentation, then you succeeded, but if it were mine I might play around with the brightest tones, especially in the trunks on the right and tops of some other trunks, and also the LLC(unless you crop.}

Even if you didn't change anything, I think you've expanded your comfort zone nicely.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on February 29, 2016 at 8:56 AM
Yes, Ed, your title seems very appropriate for the view and your processing.  For me, your processing creates a feeling of an infrared shot.  I like the stark nature and the strong graphics with your emphasis on the trunks working well.  Well done.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by Igor Doncov on February 29, 2016 at 9:09 AM
I like the graphics in this composition, the pattern of light on dark. In order to enhance that it would be good to simplify it by cropping  out the brush on the bottom and in the llc. 
Registered on November 22, 2014, 189 Posts, 2733 Comments
Comment posted by Pete Bengeyfield on February 29, 2016 at 10:40 AM
I think the overall sharpness on the smaller branches make this one.  And there's just enough vertical stems to give it stability and tie it together.  Very nice.
Registered on December 2, 2003, 1247 Posts, 3439 Comments
Comment posted by Roel Wijtmans on February 29, 2016 at 11:41 AM
I really dig this, and your title is very fitting imo. If it were mine, I would lower the brightness, that would fit this almost melancholic scene a bit better I think. Nice job previsualizing the b+w!
Registered on September 30, 2012, 116 Posts, 2257 Comments
Comment posted by David Schoen on February 29, 2016 at 3:58 PM
I took one look at this image and thought you had been following Lon for a while. Apparently he agrees. This is a good graphic with a lot of detail and abstractness.
Registered on November 6, 2006, 1213 Posts, 4587 Comments
Comment posted by Harley Goldman on February 29, 2016 at 5:43 PM
Nice strong graphic image. As others have suggested, I would tone down the highs a bit and play with contrast, but it all depends on your vision for the image. Real nice.
Registered on November 19, 2003, 586 Posts, 11271 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on February 29, 2016 at 7:45 PM
I like the way the trunks stand out from the maze of the woods behind them, Ed.  I like this image.

devil
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by scott lanz on February 29, 2016 at 8:36 PM
I like the stark, ghostly and evocative look, Ed. Amazing amount of detail in the larger view. I also would play with the tonality, maybe darkening it overall. Not sure, however. The lighter areas seem to lose some detail, but they add to the ghostly feel.
Registered on November 14, 2003, 840 Posts, 12902 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Lowe on February 29, 2016 at 9:01 PM
Here is a repost with the brightness lowered a bit and a crop from the bottom. Thanks for your thoughts everyone. Let me know what you think.

Ed
Registered on February 7, 2004, 414 Posts, 7115 Comments
Comment posted by Dave Dillemuth on February 29, 2016 at 9:38 PM
Ed,
Very nice! Has a strong graphic quality and lots to hold my interest. The repeating trunks help make some order out of the chaos. Agree on the suggestions to tone down the brightness and crop a slice off the bottom. The repost looks great.
Registered on December 10, 2015, 104 Posts, 1112 Comments
Comment posted by Ryan Shain on February 29, 2016 at 10:04 PM
Hi Ed,

I am digging what you have come up with in the repost of this fine scene. I enjoy the high ker processing, and how your creativity stands out with the processing. The trees are show cased in an unique manner. They no longer seem dead; they seem like they live on in spirit with your vision.

 
Registered on February 20, 2007, 226 Posts, 4571 Comments
Comment posted by Michael Lowe on March 1, 2016 at 1:07 PM
Great eye to see this and fine processing. I'm going to go against the grain. I like the original over the repost.devildevil
Registered on February 11, 2004, 777 Posts, 5252 Comments
Comment posted by Albert Darmo on March 1, 2016 at 10:12 PM
Hi  Edcrying    This scene would make an excellent  subject  for  B&W.   the dead  branches  provided  perfect  lines and texture  for this excellent capture ..        I agree  with  Micheal,enlightened  i like  the original  more ,  because  i see  more graphic  detail .


Albert Darmo
Canada 
Registered on November 25, 2008, 1386 Posts, 11978 Comments
Comment posted by John Williams on March 3, 2016 at 11:08 PM
Great artistry Ed. My preference is your original too. It has a "bigness" the other lacks, and I'm fine with the way it is processed. Great capture.
Registered on September 6, 2007, 221 Posts, 5985 Comments
Comment posted by Fred Weymouth on March 4, 2016 at 7:24 AM
I like this. Good balance with the vertical lines. To me the scene almost feels like it could be a reflection I am looking at in a pool of water. 
Registered on December 29, 2006, 36 Posts, 62 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Lowe on March 5, 2016 at 3:40 PM
Thanks for your thoughts everyone; always appreciated. FWIW I prefer ny original post because the FG bushes ground the image for me and the higher key dead pines were what I had previsualized when I saw the scene. Great tto have different input and choices though.

Ed
Registered on February 7, 2004, 414 Posts, 7115 Comments
Comment posted by Kah Kit Yoong on March 10, 2016 at 5:48 AM
I would go with the first version but loving the spooky atmosphere.
Registered on September 27, 2006, 636 Posts, 10682 Comments