Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Palm Warbler 2/redo
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Palm Warbler 2/redo

by Barbara Graham

Gallery: AvianPosted February 26, 2017249 views7 comments
Techs are here:

http://www.naturephotographers.net/imagecritique/ic.cgi?a=vp&pr=241797&CGISESSID=3e026684981f23c6536caad295d127f7&u=13579&title_action=

Well, I feel pretty really dumb now.  This one, a second or split-second before or after the other one, is also fluffy.  I guess it was just that wonderful rounded side view that I really liked in the other one.

All feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you!

Comments

7 comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on February 26, 2017 at 12:29 PM
I prefer this to version #1, although both have their individual merits. My only issue wiith this version is the warbler seems a bit over sharpened, and yet not as sharp as I would like it to be. I think you use Topaz for this but I don't know anythnig about how it works so I can't suggest any way to deal with that.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments
Comment posted by Barbara Graham on February 26, 2017 at 12:32 PM
Thank you, Richard.  Yes, I processed this one differently in Topaz.  I should have said that in my post.  I can definitely deal with it differently.  Thank you.
Registered on July 27, 2010, 1310 Posts, 5035 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Thompson on February 26, 2017 at 5:02 PM
This is very nice Barbara. I like the mood that the side lighting gives it and your comp is perfect imo. The sharpness looks good to me, you can even see cobwebs on the branch! Nice work!
Registered on August 7, 2014, 125 Posts, 2319 Comments
Comment posted by Keith Bauer on February 26, 2017 at 6:27 PM
I like this version more than the first image of the series you posted. Still wish for more light in the eye.  That can be helped via post processing.  Something looks odd with the plumage in the bird.  It looks like it is crunchy from sharpening gone awry.

 
Registered on November 20, 2003, 458 Posts, 4836 Comments
Comment posted by Barbara Graham on February 26, 2017 at 7:04 PM
Thanks for the comments, Richard, Steve and Keith.

Richard and Keith, I've processed this differently to "decrunch" it, I think.  Richard, I'm not sure whether this will address your "not as sharp as I would like it to be" comment.  Keith, I've added more light to the eye.

Please let me know what you think, and if anybody has any additional feedback that would be great.

Thank you.
Registered on July 27, 2010, 1310 Posts, 5035 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on February 27, 2017 at 11:56 AM
I liked the original and this one, particularly the repost is nice as well, though for my personal tastes, the shadows were probably relieved more than necessary.
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by Jenaya Launstein on March 20, 2017 at 3:24 PM
Gorgeous all around! I think I slightly prefer the repost detail wise.
Registered on February 8, 2011, 254 Posts, 1302 Comments