Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Standing Alone
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Standing Alone

by Frank Weston

Gallery: LandscapePosted March 5, 20041,783 views9 comments
Just below timberline in Rocky Mountain National Park, a pine stands alone, scarred and battered but unbroken in an icy boulder field. I wanted to capture the strength and the struggle of the tree (life) against the elements of rock and snow. The poor light completely washed out the snow, adding to the isolation of the tree.

For the technophiles:
Mamiya RZ 67
Mamiya-Sekor 250 mm
1 second @ f32
Fuji Velvia

Comments

9 comments
Comment posted by Guy Tal on March 5, 2004 at 9:28 AM
What a beautiful graphic image. Your composition is excellent but this image goes a step beyond. Can't quite put my finger on it, but there's something very moving about the scene. This is the type of image I'll print as large as possible to hang on my living room wall.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 566 Posts, 15507 Comments
Comment posted by Mary Dennis on March 5, 2004 at 10:25 AM
Hi Frank,

I think this image has a very ethereal quality to it. There is a sensation that this scene isn't quite grounded on earth, probably due to the high key whites. Yet I know that it is because of the rocks and tree.....very graphic and powerful image in my eyes.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 290 Posts, 2897 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Baumbach on March 5, 2004 at 11:26 AM
Very beautiful. It looks more like a drawing than a photograph. If you had managed to get color in the sky and texture in the snow it wouldn't be as powerful as it is.

- Dan.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 473 Posts, 7980 Comments
Comment posted by Wayne Rhodus on March 5, 2004 at 12:43 PM
Frank I have personally experienced scenes just like this in RMNP. This is a wonderfully graphic image. An ND Grad positioned on the sky would have given you more range and IMO helped this stark image. Well done and I look forward to seeing more images from you. :smile:

Wayne
Basehor, KS
Registered on November 16, 2003, 157 Posts, 3326 Comments
Comment posted by Michael E. Gordon on March 5, 2004 at 2:08 PM
This is definitely a cool image, but I have to admit that the apparent overexposure is bothersome to me. Did your scanner blow out the highlights, or is the original overexposed (intentional or otherwise)?

BTW, please don't forget to state basic technicals when posting. Thank you.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 90 Posts, 2482 Comments
Comment posted by Ott Luuk on March 5, 2004 at 4:00 PM
The image is very graphic but I am slightly bothered by the loss of detail in the whites. Partly it must be the bland light but I can't help wondering if a bit less exposure would have degraded the mood or not.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 102 Posts, 348 Comments
Comment posted by Frank Weston on March 5, 2004 at 4:56 PM
Thanks for all the great comments. I had some misgivings about how this shot would be received. It's an unusual image.

To answer a few questions:

Using a filter to enhance the sky was not possible in this situation because the sky is not visible in this photo. What looks like sky above the tree is the snow-covered slope of a mountain in the background.

The washed out snow is a function of the light at the time. It was overcast with very weak light filtering through the clouds. This is how the scene looked to my eye and in the original transparency. This is very close to the original image, which has absolutely no detail in the snow.

I apologize for not including the technical data. I tend to focus more on the final product than the equipment used. I've added the technical data for those that like know that information.
Registered on March 5, 2004, 4 Posts, 7 Comments
Comment posted by Matthew Cromer on March 6, 2004 at 8:31 AM
Wonderful high-key scene. I'd reduce black point a bit to bring contrast.
Registered on November 8, 2003, 42 Posts, 657 Comments
Comment posted by Wayne Rhodus on March 6, 2004 at 10:28 AM
Frank, Sorry about mistakenly thinking that was the horizon behind the tree. I know this tree at Emerald Lake and now know your shooting position. This is definitely a cold and harsh location in winter! And the effort to get there at first light, bravo! :smile:

Wayne
Basehor, KS
Registered on November 16, 2003, 157 Posts, 3326 Comments