Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Eastern Bluebird
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Eastern Bluebird

by Cheryl Molennor

Gallery: AvianPosted January 17, 2010166 views18 comments
Was watching this guy for a while with his mate. I was so happy they flew onto this palm. Cloudy day and I'm not happy with the loss of quality from the 2x extender.I will need to buy the 1.4
Canon 7D 300 mm 2.8 L with 2x extender
ISO 250 f6.3 1/250

Comments

18 comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on January 17, 2010 at 4:48 PM
Fantastic perch. As for the loss of quality, I'm not sure I see much of a "loss" but I don't know how the Canon 2X tele is. From what I've read the Nikon isn't too sharp. . .
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Mia McPherson on January 17, 2010 at 5:23 PM
Cheryl,

I like how the bluebird picked the palm to land on, the alert pose and the nice blues.

It doesn't look as shapr as most of your images do, but I think that might be from the slow shutter speed. I probably would have increased my ISO to get a tad more SS.

Still a nice bluebird image.
Registered on June 25, 2007, 491 Posts, 12566 Comments
Comment posted by Joel DeYoung on January 17, 2010 at 5:50 PM
Nice head turn and the perch is great. The colors look good as does the composition. Well done. :toast:
Registered on July 12, 2009, 92 Posts, 1074 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on January 17, 2010 at 5:59 PM
I shoot almost 100% of my bird photos with a 300/2.8 and matched 2x converter - the Nikon one that Luke keeps claiming isn't too sharp without any experience with it. Yes, it reduces image quality compared to the 300 alone or the 300 with the 1.4x which I also have. But if you have good long lens technique you can get professional level results from the combination. As Mia suggests you might have gotten better results using a higher ISO so you could have shot at a faster shutter speed, or stopped down more. What tripod and head did you use for this? Is it solid enough for 600mm?

Another possible issue is the light you were working with - it looks on the soft side and that means the image will have lower contrast and thus look less sharp.

I like this image - the unusual setting is quite interesting. The soft light has kept the shadows from blocking up as well.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments
Comment posted by May Haga on January 17, 2010 at 6:05 PM
Gorgeous little bird in a neat setting. Interesting that the bird is framed by the palm.
Very nice as posted.
May
Registered on February 22, 2007, 714 Posts, 8470 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Dudley on January 17, 2010 at 8:16 PM
Very nice and fairly unusual setting Cheryl and I do like that pose. I too think that you can get sharper images with that combo. My experience is that new gear, esp if it increases your focal length, can take time to develop the technique that produces the best results. I can't recall ever seeing a comment on one of Rich's images that it wasn't sharp enough.
Registered on March 30, 2007, 437 Posts, 10915 Comments
Comment posted by Cheryl Molennor on January 17, 2010 at 8:25 PM
Thanks all for the critiques and suggestions. I usually use my 2x converter and though it was good till this set of frames. The images shot at 500 looked noisy to me and I was also farther away which is why I picked this image to work on and submit. It was also the only one with this pose.so Richard I think you have something on the low light. It was very cloudy and windy that day .I use a solid Manfrotto tripod and I got a new larger head to handle my lens but parked it ont grass perhaps not real stable. I was so excited about this shoot till I saw the images on the computer. Just felt they were either soft or noisy. :wavey:
Registered on June 30, 2009, 300 Posts, 5051 Comments
Comment posted by Matt Shellenberg on January 17, 2010 at 8:41 PM
Great pose and perch Cheryl. I like that head turn. I would not think you should have any problems with a 2X converter and that lens if you use good technique. I think the low light was the culprit here.
Registered on February 6, 2008, 168 Posts, 3118 Comments
Comment posted by Charlie VanTassel on January 17, 2010 at 9:17 PM
I think that the 2X will be much better use on sunny days. I have good results in the sunshine with the Nikon version. :toast: :toast:
Registered on October 18, 2006, 644 Posts, 4801 Comments
Comment posted by Colin Pickett on January 18, 2010 at 2:34 PM
No nits from me its a fine image even with the 2x.

Nice one :toast:
Registered on December 30, 2004, 23 Posts, 156 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on January 18, 2010 at 2:38 PM
Beautiful composition with that angled bg and the neat textures, Cheryl. :toast:
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by Sally King on January 18, 2010 at 2:57 PM
I love the the explosive colors of the bird against the muted colors of the perch. Very cute pose. There is still quite a bit of detail there so I wouldn't despair. I would love to have this shot in my porfolio.
Registered on December 2, 2008, 416 Posts, 4450 Comments
Comment posted by Monica Siri on January 18, 2010 at 3:17 PM
I like the bird as framed, Cheryl. Really nice composition and color!
I also find it hard to take sharp pics with this combo and dull light, but this image is fine :wavey:
Registered on September 20, 2009, 132 Posts, 3764 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Bielefeld on January 18, 2010 at 3:26 PM
Cheryl, I like this. Was this Hand Held? I have worked with the 300 2.8 with the 2x and have found it to be a very sharp combo. I fact I was so happy with it I wish I could afford to own that combo, so I am a bit suprised to see you think the combo is not sharp. You need to be very steady to get sharp images with that combo and at 1/250 if you were not using a tripod the small loss of detail might have been due to camera shake.
Registered on December 6, 2008, 360 Posts, 7132 Comments
Comment posted by Rob Drummond on January 18, 2010 at 5:14 PM
Nice one Cheryl - I like the contrast between the bird and the background.

cheers
Rob
Registered on November 8, 2003, 617 Posts, 8267 Comments
Comment posted by Cheryl Molennor on January 18, 2010 at 6:10 PM
Thanks everyone for the great comments. I had a great day today with the extender and great lightso I do believe that the poor overcast light was the culprit. I am happy again with my extender LOL. :jump:
Registered on June 30, 2009, 300 Posts, 5051 Comments
Comment posted by Darren Colello on January 19, 2010 at 3:00 PM
This is a wonderful perch site. I agree with minor nits. Very nice sighting though. :smile:
Registered on July 27, 2009, 175 Posts, 1100 Comments
Comment posted by Graham Brown on January 19, 2010 at 6:30 PM
I really like this composition Cheryl. This is a lovely looking bird captured in an interesting environment. I sold my x2 convertor soon after I bought it - couldn't get use to focusing with it. Graham
Registered on November 20, 2007, 275 Posts, 1365 Comments