Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Tusk
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Tusk

by Ingrid Vekemans

Gallery: WildlifePosted August 8, 2010197 views4 comments
Being very close to an elephant in the bush, it struck me that if I underexposed my photo while focusing on the white ivory tusk, I would get a nice almost black and white picture of this detail.

Nikon D300
Nikkor AF-S VR 300mm f2.8
Nikon AF-S TC-14EII
bean bag

ISO400
1/6400
f4
-2/3EV

Comments

4 comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on August 9, 2010 at 8:55 AM
HI Ingrid,

Creative idea - nice to see some "out of the box" thinking! I quite like the hint of the 2nd tusk in the background and the light on the main subject is interesting. It does look to me like that despite the underexposure, some highlight detail is still lost on the lit tusk. I do find the bushes below the tusk a little on the distracting side and am left wondering if underexposing even more (either at the capture phase or by reducing exposure in post-processing) could have effectively removed the bushes and allowed you to retain all the highlight details on the tusk.

Cheers...thanks for sharing this shot.

Brad

PS: And a belated welcome to the NPN Fauna Gallery - I've been away awhile and missed your previous post(s) - I look forward to seeing more from you in the future!
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on August 9, 2010 at 12:51 PM
I quite like this Ingrid. The low key effect works well and makes that beautifully shining tusk the unmistakable focal point. I must admit though that I find the FG branches a bit distracting. I don't think Brad's suggestion of underexposing further will get rid of the effect ofthe branches; I guess you just have to come back to Africa and try this again to perfect it :biggrin: .
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Richins on August 9, 2010 at 1:11 PM
I like this and the concept you went for. The branches below and above the tusk keep me wondering what his habitat was like.
Registered on March 6, 2008, 113 Posts, 1009 Comments
Comment posted by Ingrid Vekemans on August 10, 2010 at 3:29 AM
Thanks for the comments!
Indeed the branches don't go away by underexposing further. In fact when I think the branches away, I am left with an image that I find slightly duller. However, I will definitely try this again, next time, and take the test!
Thanks again! Ingrid.
Registered on August 2, 2010, 138 Posts, 780 Comments