I know 'animalscapes' are generally not best presented on-line and need to be viewed as large as possible. Yet this won't stop me from posting them as personally (at the moment anyway) I get most satisfaction from creating successful animalscapes. Going through my last year's Namibia files I was pleased to find this.
Please do check the larger version.
Gemsbok (
Oryx gazella)
Namib Desert, Namibia
Camera Model Canon EOS-1D Mark IV
Shutter Speed 1/1000 Sec.
Aperture Value f/11
ISO Speed 400
Lens EF500mm f/4L IS USM
Cloned out 3 electricity poles in the very far distance
cropped some off the OOF FG from the bottom.
Comments
6 commentsAs you say, this is the sort of image that looks best blown up large, but the warm monotone colours in the fore- and background combined with the Gemsbok silhouette even in this size have me smiling ear to ear :^)
Very nice and thanks for sharing :^)
I think this is more of a wondering thought than a nit, but I have asked myself a couple times what the image would look like without the large dark bush running off the middle left side of the image. It could be argued that that balances the bushes on the right side, but something keeps intriguing me about what it would look like "open" to the left. Perhaps the fact that this bush appears to be the darkest element in the entire picture is what got me started, but if this were mine I might try cloning it out. You could just crop it out, but then you'd lose the wonderful symmetry to the background mountain. The thing is, the bush does help anchor the lower left side of the "Z" lines and flow that you've captured in the landscape, so it's a questionable prospect.
In any event, I really like this image and use of light...thanks for sharing it from the archives!
If this was mine, I might go more pano, sacrificing some of the foreground.
Jagdeep Rajput
You say: "I know 'animalscapes' are generally not best presented on-line" and "I get most satisfaction from creating successful animalscapes" - I'm with you on both accounts - I'm always watching for the right setting to grab animalscapes in but find the "perfect" opportunity arises on very rarely. I also find there's a good economic reason for shooting good animalscapes - it's my experience that they outsell (as prints) most more tightly composed wildlife shots!
I like the subtle layering of the foreground here. I personally like how small the Gemsbok is in the frame, but can't argue that a profile (perhaps of at least the head) of the subject might have contributed to the production of an even more compelling image. I also see merit in Jagdeep's suggestion in losing more foreground and going more pano, but you know me and out-of-focus foregrounds!
Cheers...
Brad
Jagdeep makes a good case for making it more of a pano, losing some of the oof fg. But in playing with that idea I feel it loses a certain balance with the distant mountains. They need this fg, as it in part mimicks the softness of them.