Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Stork-billed Kingfisher
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Stork-billed Kingfisher

by Manoj Wijekulasuri

Gallery: AvianPosted May 19, 2012186 views10 comments
Camera: Sony DSLR-A700
Lens: Sigma 400mm APO
f-Stop: f/6.3
Exposure: 1/40 Sec.
ISO Speed: ISO-800
Exposure: 0 step
Location: Batticaloa, Sri Lanka (April 2011)



Would like to see your comments for this picture.

Thank You
Manoj

Comments

10 comments
Comment posted by Keith Bauer on May 19, 2012 at 9:44 AM
Manoj: I've never seen one of these Kingfishers. I can't comment on the color accuracy for sure, but it looks to be a bit over saturated as the greens in the background feel unnatural. The biggest issue with the image is the noise. There is a LOT of noise in the entire image. At ISO 800, I would not have expected that level. Was this underexposed and then brought up in post processing?
Registered on November 20, 2003, 458 Posts, 4836 Comments
Comment posted by John Tobias on May 19, 2012 at 11:17 AM
Manoj, I like the pose you caught this kingfisher in and the composition of the image. It does look noisy and abit soft. My guess is your light situation was poor, if that was the case you did very well to get this good of an image. Thanks for sharing.
Registered on September 12, 2009, 2120 Posts, 6455 Comments
Comment posted by Jim DeWitt on May 19, 2012 at 4:09 PM
My word, that is a bill on the little guy, isn't it? The noise levels seem far higher than I would expect for ISO800 and the Sony A700. A post processing artifact, perhaps? The A700 has a "vivid" color setting; if you have that on, considering turning it off. The colors are just a little to strong.
Registered on August 28, 2006, 1240 Posts, 8506 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Turner on May 19, 2012 at 4:33 PM
Strange large beak and small feet. Focus seems to be around feet area. Nice share.
Registered on February 18, 2012, 534 Posts, 2755 Comments
Comment posted by Sally Wood on May 19, 2012 at 8:32 PM
Wow, what a bird.... love the pose..... . :toast:
Registered on March 8, 2012, 39 Posts, 509 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Gulash on May 20, 2012 at 12:48 AM
I agree with the previous critiques Manoj. If this is a large crop I would back off a little, it will help with some of the technical issues possibly and imho could use a bit more space esthetically.
Registered on January 28, 2005, 879 Posts, 12098 Comments
Comment posted by Manoj Wijekulasuri on May 20, 2012 at 5:16 AM
Thanks for sharing your views on this image.
John, your guess is correct, this image was taken under very low light and also hand held sitting on a driver’s seat. I was able to take only one image and the bird flew away.
As I am not happy with the overall appearance, I applied auto contrast option in photoshop and then change the green colour a bit with selective colour option. I can now see that I could have done a better job in photoshop. No Cropping applied.
About the bird, Stork-billed Kingfisher is the largest kingfisher in Sri Lanka (There are six species of kingfishers in the Island). The size is around 40cm and common bird near riverside habitats.
Jim, I always shoot in ‘Standard’ colour setting in my A700. Is that the best option for most situations?
Again, thanks all for your comments.
Cheers
Manoj
:smile:
Registered on May 6, 2012, 10 Posts, 20 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Bielefeld on May 20, 2012 at 10:34 AM
I agree with what other's have stated about this image Manoj. A really cool bird for sure. I would reprocess this taking into account the advice provided.
Registered on December 6, 2008, 360 Posts, 7132 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on May 20, 2012 at 7:12 PM
Beautiful bird, Manoj. It's a bit tight in the frame. If you cropped it, I think I'd back off a little to give the bird some room. Also a bit more room on the left would be nice to give the bird room to move into. The exposure looks excellent. The bird looks a little soft in the larger image. Were you using a tripod or hand holding? 1/40 second would be very difficult to and hold.

:toast:
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by keith mitchell on May 21, 2012 at 7:44 AM
Manoj the nits have been covered but that is one very handsome bird very well caught.

Keith. :smile:
Registered on July 12, 2008, 127 Posts, 1735 Comments