Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Dry Creek Falls
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Dry Creek Falls

by Daniel Rappaport

Gallery: LandscapePosted June 12, 2012287 views17 comments
Canon 5DMk2, TS24mm, 3 horizontal image shift, pano. Polarizer. iso 1000, f16, 1/4sec.

Comments

17 comments
Comment posted by R.Bill Moser on June 12, 2012 at 2:03 PM
Well composed and I love the lush greens and the chosen shutter speed.
Registered on January 29, 2010, 285 Posts, 4281 Comments
Comment posted by Hamed Musharbak on June 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM
well composed & nice light

Hamed
Registered on June 1, 2009, 372 Posts, 2282 Comments
Comment posted by Harry Lichtman on June 12, 2012 at 3:09 PM
Daniel - I always remember some lens vignetting when using the shift on this lens, which would be a problem when stitching images for a pano. Do you have to correct for this, or maybe I was trying to shift to the extreme? The left side feels a little tight, though maybe a reason for comping this way. Those leaves do add a lot of interest to the FG.
Registered on September 17, 2010, 304 Posts, 3507 Comments
Comment posted by Navin Sarma on June 12, 2012 at 3:18 PM
Hi Daniel, this is a really nice scene. I really like the comp and the detail is excellent throughout the frame.
Registered on July 17, 2011, 233 Posts, 1373 Comments
Comment posted by Ned Fenimore on June 12, 2012 at 3:24 PM
Really beautiful greens and exposure,,
Registered on November 1, 2003, 467 Posts, 2803 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on June 12, 2012 at 4:17 PM
I find the bottom of the frame sucks my eye down and out a bit too much in this one, as the shot is really all about the falls for me. Maybe it's the 50/50 top/bottom AND 50/50 bottom horizontally combined that segments the comp and keeps it from being all that cohesive, at least in my view. I know this spot well though, and I think maybe you've already shot some stronger foreground lines over at left before? Lenses like this are fun to play around with but I also find it's much harder to compose that way. This isn't all that bad either though, it's just I figured you'll be back here many times and might like to consider the various critique. It's a great location as long as you don't have several drunken hillbillies poaching and shooting wildly at random things to contend with.....oh, but that's another story for another time.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Cam Held on June 12, 2012 at 4:23 PM
Beautiful composition and color!
Registered on November 12, 2009, 59 Posts, 398 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on June 12, 2012 at 5:48 PM
Daniel,

Initially I was thinking the composition was a little disjointed, kind of along Marc's comments. Then I decided though how much I liked the bush/leaves on the right and how much they not only tie the top and the bottom together, but fill in nicely to balance the scene. I also like the diagonals on the rock wall and how those lines pull the eye back to the falls, almost counteracting the water running out at the bottom. Love the colors (saturation just borderline) and the processing is excellent. Works for me.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel Rappaport on June 12, 2012 at 6:35 PM
Thanks for the comments. Just about ready to give up on this for the obvious deficiencies - half and half vertically and the falls right smack in the middle and not totally held together, but I like it anyway, so there you go.
Registered on September 9, 2009, 294 Posts, 2006 Comments
Comment posted by Tom Kualii on June 12, 2012 at 9:55 PM
Sweet!!
Registered on November 24, 2010, 53 Posts, 139 Comments
Comment posted by Jean Day on June 13, 2012 at 12:21 AM
The leaves are large enough to balance the foreground, but I do think the left side is a little close to the curve. Still a nice flow to lead me to the falls. Love the lush greens. :toast:
Registered on April 10, 2011, 36 Posts, 306 Comments
Comment posted by Jeremy Calow on June 13, 2012 at 8:48 AM
I like the line that the water creates through the image, alos love the bush in the foreground. My thoughts are really that since the water is the main feature here, it really dominates the left hand side of the image, comes down in the middle and immediately dives to the left and stays there. Haven't been to this location myself so not sure if it's possible, but if the water fall could be positioned a bit more to the rhs of the scene it may balance things out a bit better ?? Just my thoughts
Registered on November 8, 2007, 39 Posts, 363 Comments
Comment posted by Scott Smorra on June 13, 2012 at 11:26 AM
Beautiful image of Dry Creek Falls Daniel. I like how you included the foreground vegetation, but I wish the foreground stream was a little bit more centered. Otherwise, this is an excellent image.
Registered on November 2, 2009, 161 Posts, 2143 Comments
Comment posted by Wick Smith on June 13, 2012 at 6:12 PM
I love the shot just as it is - I wouldn't change anything. You've done a great job of blending. I am curious how you got all the leaves to remain still for the three shot blend!
Registered on June 12, 2009, 91 Posts, 379 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on June 13, 2012 at 9:18 PM
Excellent comp and light.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel Rappaport on June 13, 2012 at 10:28 PM
Wick - the lower leaves were amazingly stable. The upper ones were waving like crazy, so I had to manually composite-in the sharpest of many tries.
Registered on September 9, 2009, 294 Posts, 2006 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on June 22, 2012 at 9:15 PM
Very nice way to capture this falls! Maybe the best comp I have seen of it! :toast:
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments