Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Sacred Ground +Repost
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Sacred Ground +Repost

by Bob Miller

Gallery: LandscapePosted June 30, 2012404 views14 comments
Yei Bi Chei enjoys the warm golden light with Rooster Rock in the background.
MONUMENT VALLEY NAVAJO TRIBAL PARK

Nikon D200, 17-55 2.8, 1/8sec@f14, tripod.

Comments

14 comments
Comment posted by Joseph Campisi on June 30, 2012 at 4:58 AM
Great comp and light Bob! My only nit is that the saturation seems a bit much, I might turn that down a bit. I might also try a crop from the LHS.
Registered on November 24, 2008, 304 Posts, 3211 Comments
Comment posted by Morkel Erasmus on June 30, 2012 at 6:15 AM
nice scene Bob
I agree on the saturation...and it seems to be sloping slightly to the RHS or is that an illusion?
you sure have some amazing geological structures in the US...
Registered on March 22, 2011, 385 Posts, 2068 Comments
Comment posted by Chad Merrell on June 30, 2012 at 9:17 AM
This is nice. Just the right amount of detail in the shadows. I'm OK with the saturation as is. I really like the composition.
Registered on July 8, 2010, 91 Posts, 304 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on June 30, 2012 at 12:18 PM
I really like the sense of depth and the isolation of the foreground pillars. I also like the colors and lighting in the immediate foreground but I could also see cropping that part out as it pulls attention from the rock outcrops.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by Nicolaus Wegner on June 30, 2012 at 3:17 PM
Would echo the saturation. Did you recover some of this? It looks like it's been pulled in a little too much...

Other than that, it's a well composed shot.
Registered on February 21, 2010, 133 Posts, 1509 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on June 30, 2012 at 3:32 PM
Bob,

Looks like the sky and storm Gods were with you this day. I like the left to right flow of the composition and the sky/storm echos that.

Have to agree on the saturation - mostly evident with the foreground. The saturation contrast (if that's a term) between the reds and greens in the foreground is a little strong.

The only other suggestion would be if you could eek out some exposure on the main rock formation that could improve things a little.

A few tweaks and you'll have a keeper for sure.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Wick Smith on June 30, 2012 at 4:58 PM
Nice shot - great light & composition.
Registered on June 12, 2009, 91 Posts, 379 Comments
Comment posted by Youssef Ismail on June 30, 2012 at 5:38 PM
I think the saturation in the FG is a little strong but not by too much, especially if it was wet from the storm you depict. But I would back it off just a bit.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 474 Posts, 5555 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Olsen on June 30, 2012 at 7:59 PM
Excellent photo Bob! The comp is great as and the sky blessed you with some great light!! If this were mine, I might tone down the foreground just a little, but leave the rest of that magic light just like it is.
Congrats on a Beautiful photograph!!
:toast:
Registered on October 19, 2006, 306 Posts, 1571 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on June 30, 2012 at 8:49 PM
What a great comp, Bob, with the rule-of-thirds determining the focal point. The tonal transitions feel a bit abrupt, though the depth created by the different light is nice.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Harry Lichtman on July 1, 2012 at 10:05 PM
Some sweet light you found here. A radiance I can feel. The prcessing looks a little un-natural, but considering the lighting is probably completely natural. Very well done.
Registered on September 17, 2010, 304 Posts, 3507 Comments
Comment posted by Jared Warren on July 3, 2012 at 4:03 PM
Beautiful! Love the soft, warm sky. Foreground does look slightly oversaturated, but that may just be how the scene was with the warm light. I'd agree with the comment of perhaps increasing the exposure very slightly on the main rock formation. Excellent work.
Registered on May 11, 2012, 84 Posts, 931 Comments
Comment posted by Bob Miller on July 4, 2012 at 12:48 AM
Thanks to all for your suggestions and comments. Here's a re-do with a little more exposure to the rock face and a little less sat in the foreground. I also took a look at giving more base to the image, or should I have stayed with the original crop? Thanks again-
Registered on January 24, 2005, 152 Posts, 405 Comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on July 4, 2012 at 4:30 PM
Really nice comp. Ditto on the other comments.
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments