Just after I took that silhouette of the squirrel early in late September at Nelson Lake Forest Preserve here in Kane County, Illinois, USA, as I was walking back to my car, I saw a monarch flying in front of me. I couldn't believe my eyes at this late date.
This was my first outing with my Pentax 300 mm lens, so I decided to follow it and try to make an image of it. After stalking it probably 300 yards, I managed to capture this image.
Pentax K-5 (similar to a D7000, only better), Pentax 300mm f/4 at f/4, 1/1000s, ISO 800.
Now having looked at many other images in this forum, I realize that they are mostly tetrapods of the mammalia class. However, if you will take a moment to review the criteria for this forum, you will note the words, "other than birds", and I submit this image does indeed fall within that exclusion.
In the future, I shall try to tend towards tetrapods, but this is what I have to offer today. (hope I ain't arrested for allitering)
Comments
5 commentsYour comment is really very interesting to me, Gary. What I literally forgot to mention is that this image is really a small 2 image focus stack. And that is where the halo you are seeing is coming from. I shot this before I got Zerene, and I used CS5 Automate stacking software.
What I will now do when I get back home tomorrow or later this week is to try to find the two RAW images and process them in Zerene and then use their great retouch software on it.
When you said "strain your eyes", to me, that equates to the same thing I do when I look at these images under 100%+ magnification. That's where this sort of thing becomes evident.
So, in summary, Gary, thank you SO much for tipping me off to this! I'm going to investigate it further and I'll e-mail you when I have a result posted so you can check it out and tell me what you think.
I'm just now learning more about focus stacking, and these halos in high contrast regions are sort of a common artifact.
Oh, and finally, why I had to use a small stack is that this was my first outing with this new Pentax 300 mm f/4, and when I got home, I discovered that I didn't have sufficient DoF, which you would think should be easy with the flattness of the subject, but lightin and shutter speed / exposure were part of the equation.
Thanks, everyone, for your comments.