Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
female monarch
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

female monarch

by John Clulow

Gallery: WildlifePosted December 1, 2012118 views5 comments
Just after I took that silhouette of the squirrel early in late September at Nelson Lake Forest Preserve here in Kane County, Illinois, USA, as I was walking back to my car, I saw a monarch flying in front of me. I couldn't believe my eyes at this late date.

This was my first outing with my Pentax 300 mm lens, so I decided to follow it and try to make an image of it. After stalking it probably 300 yards, I managed to capture this image.

Pentax K-5 (similar to a D7000, only better), Pentax 300mm f/4 at f/4, 1/1000s, ISO 800.

Now having looked at many other images in this forum, I realize that they are mostly tetrapods of the mammalia class. However, if you will take a moment to review the criteria for this forum, you will note the words, "other than birds", and I submit this image does indeed fall within that exclusion.

In the future, I shall try to tend towards tetrapods, but this is what I have to offer today. (hope I ain't arrested for allitering)

:smile:

Comments

5 comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on December 2, 2012 at 11:16 AM
John, I am grinning from your mention of "mostly tetrapods of the mammalia class." And thanks for reviewing posting guidelines. You are correct that this is indeed an animal, nor a bird and certainly not a plant. :biggrin: Your choice to place it here is appropriate, as would be placing it in "macro" gallery where the overall image size should represent about 4" or less actual space. This is a well done image, IMO, with you having successfully maintained a flat perspective to the butterfly to keep those colorful wings all within the focal plane. Exposure looks very good, successfully avoiding blowing highlights or over bright sky peeking through. The only nit to my study of this image is that the brown edged leaves in the upper left tend to cause my eye to wander a bit away from this monarch, but that is beyond your control other than awaiting another picture on another perch!
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on December 2, 2012 at 12:51 PM
What a beautiful specimen John and in absolutely great light resulting in stunning vibrant colours. Just out of curiosity re your magnification with that lens; is this a FF image?
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Gulash on December 4, 2012 at 9:41 PM
Nice colorful dorsal view! Technically excellent as well, although if I strain my eyes a little I think I'm seeing a slight sharpening halo on the butterfly. (Aren't I a pain for being so picky! )
Registered on January 28, 2005, 879 Posts, 12098 Comments
Comment posted by John Clulow on December 5, 2012 at 6:18 AM
Nice colorful dorsal view! Technically excellent as well, although if I strain my eyes a little I think I'm seeing a slight sharpening halo on the butterfly. (Aren't I a pain for being so picky! )

Your comment is really very interesting to me, Gary. What I literally forgot to mention is that this image is really a small 2 image focus stack. And that is where the halo you are seeing is coming from. I shot this before I got Zerene, and I used CS5 Automate stacking software.

What I will now do when I get back home tomorrow or later this week is to try to find the two RAW images and process them in Zerene and then use their great retouch software on it.

When you said "strain your eyes", to me, that equates to the same thing I do when I look at these images under 100%+ magnification. That's where this sort of thing becomes evident.

So, in summary, Gary, thank you SO much for tipping me off to this! I'm going to investigate it further and I'll e-mail you when I have a result posted so you can check it out and tell me what you think.

I'm just now learning more about focus stacking, and these halos in high contrast regions are sort of a common artifact.

Oh, and finally, why I had to use a small stack is that this was my first outing with this new Pentax 300 mm f/4, and when I got home, I discovered that I didn't have sufficient DoF, which you would think should be easy with the flattness of the subject, but lightin and shutter speed / exposure were part of the equation.

Thanks, everyone, for your comments.
Registered on November 1, 2012, 155 Posts, 1079 Comments
Comment posted by John Clulow on December 7, 2012 at 1:17 PM
In going back to find the raw files for this, I guess I deleted them. But anyway, I magnified the psd version and I really don't find what I would regard as significant halo effects. I guess I won't be trying it in zerene in any case. Gotta be more careful with the raw files!
Registered on November 1, 2012, 155 Posts, 1079 Comments