Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Snowy field and trees
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Snowy field and trees

by Jerry Marella

Gallery: LandscapePosted December 28, 2012111 views5 comments
A vertical of my attempt at a snow scene. I think the vertical flows better than the horizontal posted a few days ago. Cleaned up spots on the snow and added a little contrast. The open area on the lower right is there to provide a path through the snow into the trees. I think it works for the open area going to the left toward the large tree, but I'm not sure about the path going to the right. That one may be a little too close to the edge of the frame and lead out of the image.

5DM3
24-105 @ 24
1/1000 f11

Thoughts, comments, and critiques are appreciated.

Thanks,

Comments

5 comments
Comment posted by John Clulow on December 28, 2012 at 3:06 PM
Looks like you guys out west in Galena got a lot more snow than we did in the Dekalb area, Jerry. You didn't give your EXIF data, but I'm assuming that you were using a fairly wide angle, and I like your POV and DoF and the depth that gives to this.

I generally think a left-to-right flow is more natural feeling, and this has that, I think, because of the direction of the branch in the foreground in a left-to-right diagonal, which is pretty strong, supported by several if of the other branches along the left edge and echoed by the top of the big tree that is aligned on the right rule-of-thirds vertical; and the snowy hill slopes that way too. All of that is suggesting a left-to-right feeling.

I agree with you that the snow path coming from the lower right corner is going in the opposite direction, again on a diagonal, and I think that for me these two opposing forces help to bring attention into the center of the frame where a lot of the smaller trees and bushes have become hut-like refuges for rodents or other small animals. I think that the pattern of the snow balances the darker lines going in the opposite direction.

Finally, I like how the whispy clouds in the sky sort of mimick the bumps in the snow below; a clear blue sky would have not worked as well, IMHO.

I didn't see your original post, but I do like this one and I'm kind of glad we were spared the snow in this recent storm. :smile:
Registered on November 1, 2012, 155 Posts, 1079 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on December 28, 2012 at 4:28 PM
Jerry,

I think a much stronger and effective composition than your last post. I like this very much. The open path you mentioned makes for a nice flow to the composition and the texture and little bumps/details in the snow hold some interest as well. The one big Christmas tree is a solid anchor to the scene and the sky is very complimentary too.

My only wish is, that I wish there was more of the tree in the UL. Kinda one of those situations where I want to more of that tree. And I really do, that tree looks like a great subject just by itself. Maybe you have some that include that guy?

I do like this quite a lot as presented. Again, a stronger and solid composition.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Eva McDermott on December 28, 2012 at 6:42 PM
Hi Jerry - I like your B&W treatment here. Nice detail in the snowy areas and nice contrast overall. The tree in the upper left is a little distracting, but not a deal breaker.
Registered on January 4, 2009, 1015 Posts, 13229 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on December 29, 2012 at 11:37 AM
I like the brightness and contrast. The light looks right. Overall it feels a bit disorganized, to me. Nature can certainly be that way. Bringing order with the camera sometimes helps bring a nice focus to the image.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Jerry Marella on December 29, 2012 at 12:11 PM
Thanks for all the constructive comments. It's interesting how everyone has a different feeling when vewing a photo. In this case I made a concious effort to include just a bit of the tree in the upper left to close off that area and force the view back to the large tree. I guess that works and doesn't work at the same time. I don't have a larger frame since I tried to make this a full frame image. Coming from a 4mpx camera where a substantial crop meant a drop in quality, I haven't learned to leave a little room and crop to taste. Another lesson learned.

Thank you.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 142 Posts, 862 Comments