Thank you everyone for commenting on my photos so far, I really appreciate it. :)
Canon EOS 5D MIII
Canon EF 300m f/2.8L IS II USM
Hand held
Manual Exposure
ISO 1000
f/6.3
1/1000s
Hi - I would like to know if you think this works, or if the oof foreground is too distracting.
This is a Red Fox I photographed yesterday in NJ. I did some minor selective saturation on the oranges only, and cropped maybe like 20% off.
Thanks, Ashleigh
Comments
5 commentsThe Fox itself is beautifully captured, but I find the foreground a little distracting. I would try cropping some of it out and going for more of a pano crop
Nice subject and you're definitely rendered the fox very sharply. Like the others, I find the out-of-focus foreground quite distracting in this shot. In my view careful control of how out-of-focus zones are distributed in a shot is one of the toughest things, but one of the most important things, in successfully pulling off wildlife shots with telephoto lenses.
This next comment is on the personal preference side - but I rarely see a wildlife shot that I like that has two large and distinct out-of-focus zones in it (meaning an out-of-focus foreground AND background), especially if the foreground has discrete objects and/or tones in it (like the snow here - the "patches" end up looking like globs!). To me the dual OOF zones just scream "telephoto" so much and are so unnatural compared to how our eyes work that they get in the way of me appreciating the shot. But avoiding these dual OOF zones can be really challenging...(but who said good wildlife photography was easy?).
Hope this makes sense to you - and just one person's opinion...
Cheers...
Brad