Imnaha Breaks + Repost
by Marylynne Diggs
This is the fourth in my serieso of black and white landscape images. I am working on assembling a BW portfolio which I hope to show in a local gallery sometime next year. Feel free to see my gallery here to look at the other images.
This image peers over the the Imnaha Canyon from Buckhorn Lookout in Eastern Oregon. This is the same canyon Nez Perce would have descended to get to the Snake River Canyon, where the last image was taken at Dug Bar.
Canon 7D, 24-105mmL at 47mm
ISO 125, f 13, 1/160s
Processed entirely in LR
As always: eager for feedback on composition and processing, especially contrast and whether the highs and lows are too high or too low, whether there is noise or funky tints I can't see on my third rate monitor, etc.
Comments
13 commentsYou are developing quite a series! This is terrific and an excellent addition. There is so much to love about this. I'll start with something subtle, and that is the narrow presentation - it helps accentuate the long ridges. Excellent presentation. Next, I really like how the contrast fades with distance, which for me is natural given the conditions and atmosphere.
I don't have any nits. The only suggestion might be to increase the contrast in the clouds to try and add to the light and drama happening. Otherwise, this is very well done.
Lon
Jim
Thanks for the feedback. I hadn't noticed the CW tilt....the elevation changes and directional drainages could make that an illusion, and I think I relied on the trees in the original. Nonetheless, I think you all are right. I tend to have to do a -.51 rotation on just about everything that is not shot on a tripod, and sometimes things that are! I hadn't rotated this at all, so this newest version has a -1.0 in LR with this version, and I think it is truly level now (based on trees on ridges, rather than those on slopes).
I also did another pass across the fg highlights and the cloud rays to deemphasize the former and emphasize the latter. Let me know if this is better and whether you see additional tweaks I should make.
BTW, it should have been f/13 for aperture above. I just caught the typo.
ML
I didn't notice any tilt and didn't think you could do much to improve this... but you have! Thanks for taking the time to rework and post. This looks great!
--P
Albert Darmo
Canada
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI