Archive
NPN has moved to naturephotographers.networkYou’re viewing the read-only archive of the original site (2000–2018). The community is active today, with new critiques and discussions every day.
Visit NPN today →
Nature Photographers Network

Robert Fisher

Active 2006–2009 · Member since January 6, 2004 · Website
325
Forum posts

Through the Years

2006–2009
2006
43 forum posts
2008
194 forum posts · 2 images in discussions
2009
88 forum posts · 1 magazine comment

Images in Discussions & Critiques

2 images

Images attached to forum posts and critiques. Usually the member’s own work, though a critique sometimes reworks someone else’s photo.

Re: Another "Save for Web" Color Management QuestionSeptember 28, 2008Re: Another "Save for Web" Color Management QuestionSeptember 28, 2008

Discussions Started

14 topics
Avian Photography EthicsNovember 21, 2008 · 25 repliesNikon Makes a ToyNovember 16, 2006 · 20 repliesWhat do you do in the 'off' hours?February 6, 2009 · 16 repliesThoughts on CanoesAugust 23, 2008 · 13 repliesDrag & Drop vs. Backup SoftwareDecember 26, 2008 · 7 repliesPlanning the dayFebruary 17, 2009 · 6 replies5 Parks, 4 DaysAugust 29, 2008 · 5 repliesIt finally happened, ......March 8, 2009 · 5 repliesNot at all related to nature photography but still funnyOctober 27, 2008 · 4 repliesCS4 vs CS4 ExtendedDecember 29, 2008 · 4 repliesUranium mining near Grand CanyonNovember 10, 2008 · 3 repliesImpressionistic PhotosNovember 13, 2008 · 3 repliesEpson Print AcademyDecember 25, 2008 · 3 repliesToronto Photo ExhibitNovember 27, 2006 · 2 replies

On the Magazine

letters & comments
Alain, I've been doing 'impressionistic' photography for several years as well, starting on film.  You're right, that in some respects it's easier with digital particularly with a single exposure technique.  And being able to see the result straight away is helpful too.  I have yet to find a way to do multiple exposure shots digitally that works as well as I'd like or that comes close to replicating what could be done on film though.  This and the second article are very well done.  Thanks for writing them.